/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 80 Family disruption and age at men... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Family disruption and age at menarche \(\quad\) In 2013 , a study was conducted in New Zealand. Information was used from a community sample of full sister pairs. This study examined menarcheal age in a group comprising age discrepant biologically disrupted/father absent sister pairs, and a matched control group comprising age-discrepant biologically intact/father present sister pairs. The findings of the study support a causal rather than a non-causal explanation for the association between father absence and earlier pubertal timing in girls. a. Which type of observational study was used by the researchers? b. Why do you think the researchers used this design instead of a randomized experiment?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Observational case-control study. b. Ethical constraints prevent random assignment of parental presence.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Study Design

The researchers used a type of observational study called a case-control study. This type of study involves comparing two groups: one with the presence of a particular condition and one without.
02

Understand the Comparison Groups

In the study, the two groups being compared were disrupted/father absent sister pairs and intact/father present sister pairs. This allows researchers to investigate the effects of father absence on age at menarche by observing differences between the two groups.
03

Recognize the Reason for Study Design Choice

The researchers likely chose an observational study design over a randomized experiment because it is not feasible or ethical to randomly assign children to environments where a parent is absent. Ethical constraints often dictate the use of observational studies to investigate the impacts of naturally occurring conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Case-Control Study
In the context of observational studies, a case-control study is a commonly used design. It involves comparing two groups of participants: those who have a specific condition (cases) and those who do not (controls). The aim is to identify factors that may be associated with the condition by exploring potential differences between the two groups.
In the New Zealand study on menarcheal age, the researchers used a case-control approach. They compared two types of sister pairs: those from disrupted families where the father was absent, and those from intact families where the father was present. By observing these naturally occurring groups, researchers hoped to uncover the relationship between father absence and the timing of puberty in girls.
Case-control studies are particularly useful in situations where a randomized experiment is not possible due to ethical or practical reasons, as they allow researchers to examine naturally existing variations in real-world settings.
Causal Inference
Causal inference is about determining whether a cause-and-effect relationship exists between two variables. In the New Zealand study, the researchers were interested in understanding if the absence of a father could cause an earlier onset of puberty in girls.
Drawing causal inferences from observational studies like case-control studies can be challenging. Researchers must consider other variables that might influence the outcome to avoid making incorrect conclusions.
However, the findings of the study suggested a causal link. They noticed consistent differences in the onset of puberty related to the presence or absence of the father in the sister pairs. Although it is difficult to establish causation definitively without a controlled experiment, careful adjustment for confounding variables increases the credibility of their conclusions.
Ethical Considerations
When conducting research, ethical considerations are crucial, especially when human subjects are involved. Studies need to ensure that participants are not exposed to unnecessary harm or risks.
In the case of this study, directly manipulating family dynamics to assess their effects on pubertal timing would have been unethical.
This is why an observational design was chosen. It allowed researchers to study naturally occurring variations without interfering in the lives of the participants.
  • Protecting participants’ rights and welfare is paramount.
  • Researchers must obtain informed consent where possible.
  • Privacy and confidentiality of participant information must be maintained.
These ethical guidelines safeguard participants while still providing valuable insights into the subject matter.
Family Dynamics
Family dynamics refers to the ways family members interact with each other. These interactions can have significant psychological and developmental impacts on individuals.
In the context of the observational study, researchers examined how the presence or absence of a father influence the timing of a daughter's puberty.
The absence of a father might alter the family dynamic in ways that affect stress levels, emotional support, and socioeconomic factors, all of which can contribute to developmental changes in children.
  • Father presence is often linked to traditional family structures and roles.
  • Father absence might lead to changes in parental supervision and emotional support.
  • Siblings can also impact each other's development through their interactions and support systems.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for appreciating how complex family interactions can influence developmental milestones like puberty.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A 2016 study (http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26451509) investigated parallels between affect recognition in mothers with remitted depression and their children. They examined two groups - a group of remitted depressed mothers and a group of healthy mothers. Mothers with remitted depression showed a higher accuracy and response bias for sadness. The authors found corresponding results in their children. Children of remitted depressed mothers appeared to be exposed to a sadness processing bias outside acute depressive episodes. This could make children of depressed mothers more vulnerable to depressive disorders themselves. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Is this study an observational study or an experiment? Explain. c. Can we conclude that a child's depressive disorder could be the result of having a mother with remitted depression? Explain.

Prefer M\&Ms or Smarties? You want to conduct an experiment with your siblings to see whether they prefer M\&Ms or Smarties candies. a. Explain how you could do this, incorporating ideas of blinding and randomization, (i) with a completely randomized design and (ii) with a matched pairs design. b. Which design would you prefer? Why?

Unethical experimentation Give an example of a scientific question of interest for which it would be unethical to conduct an experiment. Explain how you could instead conduct an observational study.

Multiple choice: Effect of response categories \(\quad\) A study (N. Schwarz et al., Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. \(49,1985,\) p. 388 ) asked German adults how many hours a day they spend watching TV on a typical day. When the possible responses were the six categories (up to \(\frac{1}{2}\) hour, \(\frac{1}{2}\) to 1 hour, 1 to \(1 \frac{1}{2}\) hours, \(\ldots,\) more than \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours \(), 16 \%\) of respondents said they watched more than \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours per day. When the six categories were (up to \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours, \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) to 3 hours, ..., more than 4 hours \(), 38 \%\) said they watched more than \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours per day. a. The samples could not have been random, or this would not have happened. b. This shows the importance of question design, especially when people may be uncertain what the answer to the question really is. c. This study was an experiment, not an observational study.

In a survey conducted by vouchercloud.net and reported in the Palm Beach Post, it was found that of 2645 people who had participated in an extramarital affair, the average amount spent per month on the affair was \$444. (Source: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/ news/cheating-spouses-spend-444-month- affair-survey-fin/ ngbgy/? _federated=1) a. No information was given on how the surveyed individuals were selected. What type of bias could result if the 2645 individuals were not randomly selected? How would this type of bias potentially affect the responses and the sample mean amount spent per month on the affair? b. The concern was raised in the article that the individuals' answers could not be validated. What type of bias could result from untruthful answers? How would this type of bias affect the responses and the sample mean amount spent per month on the affair?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.