/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 A 2016 study (http://europepmc.o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A 2016 study (http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26451509) investigated parallels between affect recognition in mothers with remitted depression and their children. They examined two groups - a group of remitted depressed mothers and a group of healthy mothers. Mothers with remitted depression showed a higher accuracy and response bias for sadness. The authors found corresponding results in their children. Children of remitted depressed mothers appeared to be exposed to a sadness processing bias outside acute depressive episodes. This could make children of depressed mothers more vulnerable to depressive disorders themselves. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Is this study an observational study or an experiment? Explain. c. Can we conclude that a child's depressive disorder could be the result of having a mother with remitted depression? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Response: Children's affect recognition; Explanatory: Mother's mental health status. b. Observational study. c. No causation; it shows correlation, not causation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Response Variable

In this study, the response variable is the affect recognition ability in children. The study focuses on how children process emotions, particularly sadness, as a response to their environment influenced by their mother's mental health condition.
02

Identify the Explanatory Variable

The explanatory variable in this study is the mental health status of the mothers, specifically whether the mothers have remitted depression or are healthy. This is the variable that might influence how children recognize and respond to affect, particularly sadness.
03

Determine the Nature of the Study

This study is an observational study. Researchers observed and compared affect recognition between groups without manipulating the mother's mental health status or the children's affect recognition abilities. The study does not involve any intervention or experimental control, but rather records existing conditions and associations.
04

Assess Causation

We cannot conclude causation from this study due to its observational nature. The correlation between children's sadness processing bias and having a mother with remitted depression does not imply that having such a mother causes the depressive disorder in children. There could be other confounding factors involved that were not controlled.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
In psychological research, observational studies are essential tools for understanding relationships between variables in real-world settings. In an observational study, researchers observe and collect data without altering any variables or conditions. In the context of the 2016 study on mothers with remitted depression and their children's affect recognition, the researchers did not manipulate the variables, such as the mental health of the mothers or the children's emotion processing abilities. They simply observed the outcomes as they naturally occur.

There are important characteristics of observational studies:
  • They allow researchers to study phenomena in natural settings.
  • They are useful for identifying correlations between variables.
  • They cannot establish causality due to the lack of control over extraneous variables.
In this case, the study observed the parallels in sadness recognition between mothers with remitted depression and their children, providing insights into potential associations without interference.
Response Variable
The response variable in any study is what researchers aim to measure or predict. It's the outcome that may be affected by changes in the explanatory variable. In the 2016 study, the response variable is the children's ability to recognize affect, specifically focusing on processing sadness.

This response variable was chosen because the researchers wanted to understand if and how the mothers' mental health influenced their children's emotion recognition abilities. Observing these outcomes helps to highlight existing patterns or associations between the children's emotional processing capabilities and their mothers' mental health status.
  • Response variables are dependent; they change based on other factors.
  • Measuring these variables provides insight into the study's focus area.
In the study, differences in sadness recognition might indicate vulnerability patterns in children that can be linked to their mothers' mental health history.
Explanatory Variable
Explanatory variables are those that researchers manipulate or observe to see how they impact the response variable. In the exercise about mothers with remitted depression and their children's affect recognition abilities, the explanatory variable is the mental health status of the mothers. This includes whether the mothers had remitted depression or were classified as healthy.

The explanatory variable is pivotal because it helps the researchers investigate the potential influence it has on the children's ability to process emotions. Understanding how different maternal health statuses impact children’s emotional recognition can guide further research into preventive strategies or interventions.
  • Explanatory variables are considered independent variables.
  • They provide a basis for establishing patterns and correlations.
In this study, researchers aim to explore how these maternal conditions could be contributing to the children’s affect processing, particularly the recognition of sadness.
Causation in Observational Studies
One of the biggest challenges in interpreting observational studies is determining causation. Causation implies a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. However, observational studies, like the one examining remitted depression in mothers and emotion processing in their children, only establish correlations or associations, not causality.

In this particular study, while there is evidence to suggest a correlation between a mother's remitted depression status and her child's tendency to process sadness, causation cannot be concluded. This is due to the presence of potential confounding variables that weren’t controlled or measured.
  • Confounding variables can influence both the explanatory and response variables, providing alternative explanations for observed associations.
  • Observational studies require caution in interpreting causal relationships. Experimental studies are preferable for proving causation due to their controlled nature.
Therefore, while the study suggests a link, it doesn’t confirm whether maternal mental health causes children’s emotional processing patterns.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

There have been anecdotal reports of the ability of duct tape to remove warts. In an experiment conducted at the Madigan Army Medical Center in the state of Washington (Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine \(2002 ; 156: 971-974)\), 51 patients between the ages of 3 and 22 were randomly assigned to receive either duct-tape therapy (covering the wart with a piece of duct tape) or cryotherapy (freezing a wart by applying a quick, narrow blast of liquid nitrogen). After two months, the percentage successfully treated was \(85 \%\) in the duct tape group and \(60 \%\) in the cryotherapy group. a. Identify the response variable, the explanatory variable, the experimental units, and the treatments. b. Describe the steps of how you could randomize in assigning the 51 patients to the treatment groups.

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants Researchers at Yale University's Infant Cognition Center were interested in determining whether infants had the ability to distinguish between the actions of helping and hindering. Each infant in the study was shown two videos. One video included a figure performing a helping action and the other included a figure performing a hindering action. Infants were presented with two toys resembling the helping and hindering figures from the videos and allowed to choose one of the toys to play with. The researchers conjectured that, even at a very young age, the infants would tend to choose the helpful object. a. How might the results of this study been biased had each infant been shown the video with the helpful figure before being shown the video with the hindering figure? b. How could such a potential bias be eliminated?

Explain whether an experiment or an observational study would be more appropriate to investigate the following: a. Whether caffeine has an effect on long-term memory. b. Whether multitasking in class affects the grades of business students. c. Whether studying abroad tends to be associated positively with international labor market mobility later in life for university graduates.

Consider an experiment being designed to study the effectiveness of an experimental pain reduction medication. The plan includes recruiting 100 individuals suffering from moderate to severe pain to participate. One half of the group will be assigned to take the actual experimental drug, and the other half will be assigned a placebo. The study will be blind in the sense that the individuals will not know which treatment they are receiving. At the end of the study, individuals will be asked to record, using a standardized scale, how much pain relief they experienced. Why is it important to use a placebo in such a study?

Multiple choice: Sexual harassment In 1995 in the United Kingdom, the Equality Code used by the legal profession added a section to make members more aware of sexual harassment. It states that "research for the Bar found that over 40 percent of female junior tenants said they had encountered sexual harassment during their time at the Bar." This was based on a study conducted at the University of Sheffield that sent a questionnaire to 334 junior tenants at the Bar, of whom 159 responded. Of the 159,67 were female. Of those females, 3 said they had experienced sexual harassment as a major problem, and 24 had experienced it as a slight problem. a. The quoted statement might be misleading because the nonresponse was large. b. No one was forced to respond, so everyone had a chance to be in the sample, which implies it was a simple random sample. c. This was an example of a completely randomized experiment, with whether a female junior tenant experienced sexual harassment as the response variable. d. This was a retrospective case-control study, with those who received sexual harassment as the cases.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.