/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 Consider an experiment being des... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider an experiment being designed to study the effectiveness of an experimental pain reduction medication. The plan includes recruiting 100 individuals suffering from moderate to severe pain to participate. One half of the group will be assigned to take the actual experimental drug, and the other half will be assigned a placebo. The study will be blind in the sense that the individuals will not know which treatment they are receiving. At the end of the study, individuals will be asked to record, using a standardized scale, how much pain relief they experienced. Why is it important to use a placebo in such a study?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A placebo provides a control to compare against the drug, ensuring changes are due to the medication itself, not other factors.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Purpose of the Experiment

Before we delve into why a placebo is used, let's clearly understand the goal of this study. The aim is to determine the effectiveness of a new pain reduction medication by measuring pain relief in participants.
02

Defining a Placebo in an Experiment

A placebo is a substance with no therapeutic effect, used as a control in testing the effectiveness of another substance. In this case, it is a fake version of the medication given to the control group.
03

Justifying the Use of a Placebo

The use of a placebo helps establish a control group in the study. This control group serves as a baseline to compare against the group receiving the experimental drug. It allows researchers to determine if changes in pain relief are due to the drug itself or other factors, such as the psychological effect of believing they’ve received treatment (the placebo effect).
04

Ensuring Blindness for Objective Results

The study is described as blind, which means the participants do not know if they are receiving the actual drug or the placebo. This prevents personal biases and expectations from influencing their perception of pain relief, ensuring more objective results.
05

Concluding the Importance of Placebo

By using a placebo, the reliability and accuracy of the study results are improved. It isolates the effect of the experimental medication from all other variables, including the placebo effect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Placebo Effect
The placebo effect is a powerful phenomenon in experimental studies, especially those related to medicine. It occurs when participants experience improvements in their condition simply because they believe they are receiving treatment, even if what they receive is inactive or a "dummy" pill. This is common in trials where participants may report changes in symptoms that are actually due to their expectation of getting better rather than any active medication.
To understand the placebo effect, it's essential to recognize that our minds can influence how we perceive pain or relief. When participants believe they are part of an active treatment group, their optimism can lead to real changes in their reported state.
  • This psychological effect demonstrates why placebos are used as controls in studies.
  • It provides a baseline to gauge the true effectiveness of the experimental drug.
By accounting for the placebo effect, researchers can ensure more accurate conclusions about a drug's actual benefits.
Control Group
In experimental designs, the control group is critical for comparison. It consists of individuals who do not receive the experimental treatment, instead receiving either no intervention or a placebo. This group acts as a benchmark by which researchers compare treatment effects.
In our study on pain relief medication, the control group receives a placebo. This group is crucial for several reasons:
  • It helps isolate the drug's impact from other variables, including the natural progression of pain or spontaneous improvement.
  • Provides a reference to measure true effectiveness of the new drug by comparing outcomes between the test and control groups.
Without a control group, it would be nearly impossible to determine if the medication or some other external factor led to the observed effects.
Blind Study
A blind study ensures that participants cannot distinguish whether they are receiving the actual treatment or a placebo. In the context of our pain relief study, blindness is employed by withholding information about which pill, the actual drug or the placebo, is assigned to the participants.
This type of study design is significant because it minimizes bias:
  • Participants are less likely to manipulate their reporting based on preconceived expectations.
  • Reduces placebo effect since participants do not know what they are receiving.
Additionally, blinding prevents participants' expectations from altering their perception, leading to more reliable data on the medication's efficacy. The objectivity gained in a blind study ultimately strengthens the credibility of the findings.
Pain Relief Measurement
Accurate measurement of pain relief is fundamental to assess the effectiveness of treatments in clinical trials. In our study, participants use a standardized pain relief scale to report their pain levels. This approach ensures consistency in reporting and comparison among all participants.
Standardized scales provide:
  • Quantitative data that is easier to analyze statistically for potential differences between the experimental and control groups.
  • A common ground to assess changes in pain perception effectively.
Consistent pain measurement allows researchers to directly compare results across the study, making it easier to discern the medication's actual impact on pain relief. By employing a reliable method of measurement, the study can yield insights into the potential benefits of the drug, beyond the placebo effect.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The journal Energy Policy ( 2014,\(65: 57-67)\) presents a survey of opinions about fracking. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is the process of drilling through rock and injecting a pressurized mixture of sand, water, and chemicals that fractures the rock and releases oil and gas. There has been much debate in the media about its impact on the environment, on land owners, and on the economy. The survey involved contacting a nationally representative sample of 1960 adults in 2012 . Of the 1960 people contacted, 1061 adults responded to the survey. The study reported that those more familiar with fracking, women, and those holding egalitarian worldviews were more likely to oppose fracking. a. Describe the population of interest for this study. b. Explain why a census is not practical for this study. What advantages does sampling offer? c. Explain how nonresponse bias might be an issue in this study.

A local telephone directory has 50,000 names, 100 per page for 500 pages. Explaining how you found and used random numbers, select 10 numbers to identify subjects for a simple random sample of 10 names.

In 1995,1000 teenagers particlpated in a survey. The respondents were asked about their dream jobs. Fifteen years later, a follow-up survey was conducted to see whether people were working in the jobs they wanted as teenagers or not. Was this study a retrospective study or a prospective study? Explain.

Explain whether an experiment or an observational study would be more appropriate to investigate the following: a. Whether caffeine has an effect on long-term memory. b. Whether multitasking in class affects the grades of business students. c. Whether studying abroad tends to be associated positively with international labor market mobility later in life for university graduates.

Munchie capture-recapture Your class can use the capture-recapture method described in the previous exercise to estimate the number of goldfish in a bag of Cheddar Goldfish. Pour the Cheddar Goldfish into a paper bag, which represents the pond. Sample 10 of them. For this initial sample, use Pretzel Goldfish to replace them, to represent the tagged fish. Then select a second sample and derive an estimate for \(N,\) the number of Cheddar Goldfish in the original bag. See how close your estimate comes to the actual number of fish in the bag. (Your teacher will count the population of Cheddar Goldfish in the bag before beginning the sampling.) If the estimate is not close, what could be responsible, and what would this reflect as difficulties in a real-life application such as sampling a wildlife population?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.