/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 94 Distinguish helping and hinderin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants Researchers at Yale University's Infant Cognition Center were interested in determining whether infants had the ability to distinguish between the actions of helping and hindering. Each infant in the study was shown two videos. One video included a figure performing a helping action and the other included a figure performing a hindering action. Infants were presented with two toys resembling the helping and hindering figures from the videos and allowed to choose one of the toys to play with. The researchers conjectured that, even at a very young age, the infants would tend to choose the helpful object. a. How might the results of this study been biased had each infant been shown the video with the helpful figure before being shown the video with the hindering figure? b. How could such a potential bias be eliminated?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A bias may occur if infants consistently see the helpful video first. Randomizing video order can eliminate this potential bias.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Potential Bias

When each infant is consistently shown the video with the helpful figure before the hindering figure, a bias might occur. This is because the order could influence the infants' preferences, leading to a preference for the toy they see first, not necessarily because it's helpful. This order effect can skew the results, making it seem like infants prefer the helpful figure more than they actually do.
02

Rationale for Randomized Order

To eliminate the potential bias related to the order of video presentation, it's important to randomize the sequence in which the videos are shown. By randomly assigning which video an infant sees first, order effects are neutralized across the sample, preventing the preference for the helping figure from being solely due to its prior presentation.
03

Implementing Randomization

Implementing this involves designing the study so that half of the infants see the helping video first and the other half see the hindering video first. This way, any potential order effect is distributed evenly among participants, making it possible to observe genuine preferences unaffected by presentation order.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bias in Experimental Design
Bias in experimental design occurs when certain elements of the study are structured in a way that could influence the results unintentionally. In the context of infant cognition studies, like the one conducted at Yale University's Infant Cognition Center, bias can emerge if infants are always shown the same sequence of videos. For instance, showing all infants the helper video before the hinderer video might create a preference simply due to the order in which the information is presented. This is known as an order effect, where the results could mistakenly reflect a preference for the helper due to its earlier presentation rather than its intrinsic properties. Recognizing and addressing such bias is critical for ensuring accurate and reliable findings.
Randomization
Randomization is a key technique used in experimental designs to eliminate biases, including those related to the order of stimuli presentation. By randomly determining the sequence in which each infant sees the video clips, researchers can ensure that any potential order effects are spread evenly across all participants.
  • Half of the infants could be shown the helping figure video first, while the other half sees the hindering figure video first. This approach helps distribute the influence of order evenly between both groups.
  • This way, any preference for the toys related to the videos would more likely represent a genuine choice rather than a bias introduced by the order.
Randomization allows researchers to observe true cognitive preferences by neutralizing the sequence as a variable, ensuring that the results are not skewed by presentation order.
Order Effects
Order effects refer to how the sequence in which stimuli are presented can influence participants' responses. In studies involving infants, such as those investigating their ability to distinguish between helping and hindering actions, order effects can significantly impact results. When each infant watches the helper video before the hinderer video, they might automatically favor the helper toy not because they recognize its helpfulness, but simply due to its early introduction.
Infants often display what's called a novelty preference, showing more interest in the first item they encounter. To combat order effects, researchers can implement a counterbalancing strategy, which involves rotating the sequence of stimuli across participants. This approach helps ensure that order effects are minimized, leading to more accurate insights into infant cognition and preference formation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Internet poll Find an example of results of an Internet poll. Do you trust the results of the poll? If not, explain why not.

A nonprofit organization surveyed its members for their opinion regarding an upcoming charity walk. The survey asked, "We are considering a shift of our preannounced location to a new one this year. Would you be willing to walk from the new location if it meant that many more teenage suicides would be avoided?" a. Explain why this is an example of a leading question. b. Explain why a better way to ask this question would be, "which of the two would you prefer as a starting point for the walk \(-\) the preannounced or the new location?"

In \(2015,\) the National Drowning Report published in Australia shows a drowning rate of 0.26 per 100,000 people in the Australian Capital Territory \((\mathrm{ACT})\). A few days ago, you read about a teenager who drowned in the middle of the sea in the \(\mathrm{ACT}\). In deciding whether to go to the \(\mathrm{ACT}\) for a beach holiday with your best friends, should you give more weight to the study or to the news you have recently read about a teenager who drowned? Why?

A nationwide census is conducted in the United States every 10 years. a. Give at least two reasons the United States takes a census only every 10 years. b. What are reasons for taking the census at all? c. The most commonly discussed characteristic learned from a census is the size of the population. However, other characteristics of the population are measured during each census. Using the Internet, report two such characteristics recorded during the 2010 U.S. census. (Hint: Visit the following website: www.census.gov/2010.census.)

Explain whether an experiment or an observational study would be more appropriate to investigate the following: a. Whether caffeine has an effect on long-term memory. b. Whether multitasking in class affects the grades of business students. c. Whether studying abroad tends to be associated positively with international labor market mobility later in life for university graduates.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.