/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 73 Prefer M\&Ms or Smarties? Yo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Prefer M\&Ms or Smarties? You want to conduct an experiment with your siblings to see whether they prefer M\&Ms or Smarties candies. a. Explain how you could do this, incorporating ideas of blinding and randomization, (i) with a completely randomized design and (ii) with a matched pairs design. b. Which design would you prefer? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A matched pairs design provides a more precise measure of individual preferences by controlling for variability across siblings, making it ideal for small subject groups.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to design two types of experiments to determine if siblings prefer M&Ms or Smarties. These experiments will incorporate randomization and blinding.
02

Completely Randomized Design

In a completely randomized design, each sibling will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group receives M&Ms and the other receives Smarties. Randomization ensures that each sibling has an equal chance of being in either group, controlling for individual differences. Blinding can be introduced by not telling the siblings which brand they are receiving, if the candies can be similarly disguised.
03

Matched Pairs Design

In a matched pairs design, each sibling will be given both types of candies, one after the other. The order in which they receive M&Ms or Smarties is randomized. Blinding can again be applied by disguising the candies if possible. Each sibling forms a 'pair' with themselves, comparing their own preferences for each candy type.
04

Choose the Preferred Design

The matched pairs design is often preferred when there are only a few subjects (siblings), as it controls for between-subject variability, allowing for a more precise measure of individual preferences.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomization
Randomization is a core concept in experimental design and plays a pivotal role in ensuring the reliability and validity of the results. It involves assigning subjects to different groups in an experiment purely by chance, rather than allowing the experimenter's or subjects' preferences to influence the assignment.

This process helps to distribute any unique characteristics of individuals across the experimental conditions. For example, in the experiment of determining preferences between M&Ms and Smarties, randomization can be applied by randomly assigning siblings to taste either M&Ms or Smarties first.

By doing so, each sibling has an equal opportunity to try both candies without any biases influencing the results. Randomization is crucial because it helps to eliminate selection bias, making sure the experiment’s findings reflect true differences between the conditions rather than external factors. Thus, randomization promotes the generalizability of the experiment results.
Blinding
Blinding is an ingenious strategy used in experimental design to prevent bias from influencing the results. It involves concealing critical information from the participants, the people administering the experiment, or both, that might lead to a subjective influence on the outcome.

In the context of the M&Ms versus Smarties experiment, blinding can be done by providing the candies to the siblings in identical containers so they cannot visually distinguish between the brands. This prevents their previous experiences, expectations, or brand loyalty from affecting their feedback.
Blinding ensures that participants' responses truly reflect their unbiased preferences, attributing any differences in preference solely to the candies themselves. This method enhances the credibility of the experiment by reducing response bias and fostering objective evaluation.
Matched Pairs Design
The Matched Pairs Design is an experimental approach often used when the sample size is small, or the differences between individuals are expected to affect the outcome significantly. In this design, each participant is essentially paired with themselves across different conditions.

For the candy preference test, each sibling would act as their own control. They would taste both M&Ms and Smarties, but the order in which they receive the candies is randomized. This design allows each sibling to compare their own response to both candy types, controlling for individual taste differences and eliminating the variability between different siblings.

Because this design accounts for their own preferences, it offers a precise measure of preference without being influenced by other cousins' reactions. Matched Pairs Design is particularly powerful because it highlights within-subject variations, providing valuable, individualized insights.
Completely Randomized Design
A Completely Randomized Design is one of the simplest yet effective forms of experimental design. In this setup, participants are randomly assigned to different groups where each group receives a distinct treatment or intervention.

In the case of siblings testing M&Ms versus Smarties, they would be divided into two groups randomly. One group would receive M&Ms while the other would get Smarties. This random group assignment aims to ensure equal distribution of potential confounding variables such as age, gender, or taste variation between the groups.

Because all participants are randomized into separate groups, the design is particularly useful when there's a need to neutralize the impact of external factors. This method is exceptionally effective in large sample sizes, offering a straightforward approach to discern the overarching trends in preferences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 1995,1000 teenagers particlpated in a survey. The respondents were asked about their dream jobs. Fifteen years later, a follow-up survey was conducted to see whether people were working in the jobs they wanted as teenagers or not. Was this study a retrospective study or a prospective study? Explain.

Quota sampling An interviewer stands at a street corner and conducts interviews until obtaining a quota in various groups representing the relative sizes of the groups in the population. For instance, the quota might be 50 factory workers, 100 housewives, 60 elderly people, 30 Hispanics, and so forth. This is called quota sampling. Is this a random sampling method? Explain and discuss potential advantages or disadvantages of this method. (The Gallup organization used quota sampling until it predicted, incorrectly, that Dewey would easily defeat Truman in the 1948 presidential election.)

Voluntary sports polls In \(2014,\) the Pittsburgh Penguins were ahead of the New York Rangers three games to one in the first round of the National Hockey League playoffs. ESPN.com conducted a voluntary, online poll that asked respondents to predict the outcomes of the rest of the series. Of all 1,094 respondents, \(52 \%\) said Penguins in 5 games, \(34 \%\) said Penguins in 6 games, \(5 \%\) said Penguins in 7 games, and \(9 \%\) said Rangers in 7 games. a. Was this a simple random sample? Explain. b. If ESPN.com wanted to determine the true proportions for all sports fans, how could it do so more reliably?

A nonprofit organization surveyed its members for their opinion regarding an upcoming charity walk. The survey asked, "We are considering a shift of our preannounced location to a new one this year. Would you be willing to walk from the new location if it meant that many more teenage suicides would be avoided?" a. Explain why this is an example of a leading question. b. Explain why a better way to ask this question would be, "which of the two would you prefer as a starting point for the walk \(-\) the preannounced or the new location?"

Family disruption and age at menarche \(\quad\) In 2013 , a study was conducted in New Zealand. Information was used from a community sample of full sister pairs. This study examined menarcheal age in a group comprising age discrepant biologically disrupted/father absent sister pairs, and a matched control group comprising age-discrepant biologically intact/father present sister pairs. The findings of the study support a causal rather than a non-causal explanation for the association between father absence and earlier pubertal timing in girls. a. Which type of observational study was used by the researchers? b. Why do you think the researchers used this design instead of a randomized experiment?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.