/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 79 Marijuana and schizophrenia \(\q... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Marijuana and schizophrenia \(\quad\) Many research studies focus on a link between marijuana use and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Studies have found that people with schizophrenia are twice as likely to smoke marijuana as those without the disorder. Data also suggest that individuals who smoke marijuana are twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as those who do not use the drug Contributing to the apparent relationship, a comprehensive review done in 2007 of the existing research reported that individuals who merely try marijuana increase their risk of developing schizophrenia by \(40 \%\). Meanwhile, the percentage of the population who has tried marijuana has increased dramatically in the United States over the past 50 years, whereas the percentage of the population affected by schizophrenia has remained constant at about \(1 \%\). What might explain this puzzling result?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The increase in marijuana usage does not directly cause more schizophrenia cases, likely due to genetic predispositions and other independent factors. Correlation is not causation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Initial Data

The problem statement tells us individuals with schizophrenia are twice as likely to use marijuana. It also mentions the risk of developing schizophrenia increases by 40% for those who try marijuana. Observations show marijuana usage has increased over time, yet schizophrenia prevalence remains constant at 1% of the population. We need to identify reasons for these seemingly contradictory trends.
02

Considering Causation vs Correlation

The first step is to consider whether a causal relationship exists. The data shows correlations: people with schizophrenia smoke more, and marijuana users have a higher likelihood of developing schizophrenia. Correlation does not imply causation; other factors may contribute to both marijuana use and schizophrenia independently.
03

Exploring Lurking Variables

Look for other variables or factors that might link marijuana use and schizophrenia. Genetic predispositions, mental health issues, or social factors might drive both marijuana use and schizophrenia independently, without one causing the other directly.
04

Analyzing Schizophrenia Incidence

Examine why the incidence of schizophrenia has not changed despite increased marijuana use. Genetic factors and early life environment predominantly influence schizophrenia, suggesting that marijuana might not be a major factor in its development.
05

Assessing Temporal Changes and Reporting

Consider changes in reporting and diagnosis over time. Although marijuana use has risen, reporting methods and diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia might have kept case numbers stable, or perhaps genetic factors are more strongly dictating its prevalence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Marijuana Studies
Marijuana studies often aim to explore the relationship between cannabis use and various health aspects, including psychological disorders. Scientific examinations typically involve comparing groups of individuals who use marijuana to those who do not. Researchers assess various outcomes, such as mental health impacts, over time. These investigations look at historical data trends and attempt to find connections between marijuana use and the onset of disorders like schizophrenia.

In these studies, it is essential to differentiate between correlation and causation. Correlation indicates a relationship between two variables, while causation implies that one variable directly affects the other.
  • Correlation Example: People with schizophrenia using marijuana more frequently.
  • Causation Consideration: Whether marijuana use leads to the development of schizophrenia or vice versa.
Researchers aim to identify not just if these variables are linked, but how they influence each other and if other factors could impact the relationship.
Psychotic Disorders
Psychotic disorders include a range of mental health conditions that affect a person's thinking, emotions, perceptions, and behaviors, often characterized by an altered perception of reality. Schizophrenia is one of the most well-known psychotic disorders.

In the context of marijuana use, there's an analytical focus on whether this substance could exacerbate the likelihood of developing psychoses. Studies suggest that while a link exists, it's critical to recognize that not all marijuana users develop psychotic disorders. Several factors could contribute to these conditions, not solely marijuana use.
  • Genetic predispositions: Family history of mental illnesses might play a crucial role.
  • Environmental factors: Stressful environments or traumatic experiences can influence mental health.
  • Individual biology: How one's body and brain chemistry react to substances like marijuana.
These elements collectively need consideration when examining psychological disorders in the backdrop of cannabis studies.
Schizophrenia Prevalence
Schizophrenia is a complex and severe mental health disorder that affects about 1% of the population worldwide. Despite increases in factors traditionally thought to influence mental health, such as recreational drug use, the prevalence rate of schizophrenia has remained fairly constant.

This consistent prevalence could be due to numerous reasons, with a strong focus on genetic and biological factors that predominantly dictate its incidence.
  • Stable prevalence could suggest genetic components outweigh environmental influences like marijuana use.
  • Research supports that early life factors and genetic predispositions have a more significant role.
While research into schizophrenia is ongoing, it's evident that many factors contribute to its incidence, beyond just marijuana usage. As such, causation should not immediately assume marijuana directly results in schizophrenia, given these genetic constants.
Lurking Variables
Lurking variables are hidden factors that might contribute to an observed effect but are not accounted for in the initial examination. In studies examining the relationship between marijuana use and schizophrenia, lurking variables could substantially impact results.
  • Genetic factors: Unacknowledged genetic susceptibilities that influence both tendencies can skew results.
  • Social influences: Peer pressure or societal acceptance can lead to increased use, unrelated to any mental health effects.
  • Mental health background: Individuals with pre-existing mental health conditions might be prone to both schizophrenia and marijuana use, independently.
Identifying these lurking variables is critical in research. It aids in understanding the complex web of factors that might lead to schizophrenia, separate from marijuana use itself. Acknowledging these factors helps ensure that correlations are appropriately understood, rather than misattributed to causation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

During a baseball game between the Boston Brouhahas and the Minnesota Meddlers, the broadcaster mentions that the away team has won "13 consecutive meetings between the two teams played on nights with a full moon." a. Is the broadcaster's comment based on observational or experimental data? b. The current game is being played in Boston. Should the Boston Brouhahas be concerned about the recent full moon trend?

If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

The journal Energy Policy ( 2014,\(65: 57-67)\) presents a survey of opinions about fracking. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is the process of drilling through rock and injecting a pressurized mixture of sand, water, and chemicals that fractures the rock and releases oil and gas. There has been much debate in the media about its impact on the environment, on land owners, and on the economy. The survey involved contacting a nationally representative sample of 1960 adults in 2012 . Of the 1960 people contacted, 1061 adults responded to the survey. The study reported that those more familiar with fracking, women, and those holding egalitarian worldviews were more likely to oppose fracking. a. Describe the population of interest for this study. b. Explain why a census is not practical for this study. What advantages does sampling offer? c. Explain how nonresponse bias might be an issue in this study.

Security awareness training \(\quad\) Of 400 employees at a company, \(25 \%\) work in production, \(40 \%\) work in sales and marketing, and \(35 \%\) work in new product development. As part of a security awareness training program, the group overseeing implementation of the program will randomly choose a sample of 20 employees to begin the training; the percentages of workers from each departmer in the sample are to align with the percentages throughou the company. a. What type of sampling could be used to achieve this goal? b. Using this sampling method, determine a sample of 20 employees to be chosen.

Issues in clinical trials A randomized clinical trial is planned for AIDS patients to investigate whether a new treatment provides improved survival over the current standard treatment. It is not known whether it will be better or worse. a. Why do researchers use randomization in such experiments rather than letting the subjects choose which treatment they will receive? b. When patients enrolling in the study are told the purpose of the study, explain why they may be reluctant to be randomly assigned to one of the treatments. c. If a researcher planning the study thinks the new treatment is likely to be better, explain why he or she may have an ethical dilemma in proceeding with the study.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.