/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 If you want to conduct a study w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If you want to conduct a study with humans to see whether cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
An observational study respects natural phone usage and avoids ethical issues, making it more realistic than an experiment.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Research Question

The research question involves investigating whether cell phone use is associated with an increased likelihood of brain cancer in humans.
02

Consider the Nature of an Experiment

An experiment typically involves randomly assigning subjects to a treatment group and a control group. In this scenario, we would need to randomly assign people to use cell phones or not, which may involve ethical and practical challenges.
03

Recognize Ethical Concerns

Conducting an experiment where participants are forced to use or not use cell phones involves ethical concerns, as it may impose health risks against their will.
04

Evaluate Practicality

Maintaining random assignment over a long period to observe potential effects on brain cancer could be impractical and costly, making it difficult to control all variables.
05

Understand the Observational Study Approach

An observational study involves observing and collecting data without interfering with how subjects manage their phone use. Researchers can look for correlations without assigning treatments.
06

Conclude on the Realistic Study Type

Given ethical and practical limitations, an observational study, which respects participants' natural phone usage, is more realistic than an experiment for this research question.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Research Ethics
Research ethics is an essential consideration, especially when conducting studies involving human participants. In an ethical context, researchers need to ensure that their study maintains the dignity, rights, and welfare of all participants. It involves obtaining informed consent, where participants are made fully aware of the study's nature, potential risks, and their rights to withdraw at any time.

In a hypothetical study investigating cell phone use and brain cancer, an experimental design might require participants to change their phone usage habits, possibly against their preferences, which is ethically questionable. This can introduce unacceptable health risks, and coercing participants to continue poses a significant ethical dilemma.

Moreover, researchers need to assure that participants will not be exposed to harm, either physically or psychologically, due to the study. These ethical considerations lead researchers to opt for observational studies where such issues can be significantly minimized.
  • Obtaining informed consent is crucial in maintaining ethical standards.
  • Minimizing potential risks to participants is a primary ethical obligation.
The Importance of Experimental Design
Experimental design is a critical part of any scientific research as it determines how the data will be collected and analyzed. In an ideal scenario, an experiment might randomly assign subjects to use or not use cell phones to observe any resulting effects on brain cancer incidence. However, designing such experiments for human populations can be fraught with practical hurdles.

Random assignment in such a context is difficult because it requires precise control over participants' behaviors, potentially over many years, to account for long-term health effects like cancer. This makes the design complex and challenging to implement. Moreover, the need for a control group further complicates the process, as it is impractical to expect individuals to refrain from phone use, especially given modern reliance on technology.

Thus, when the variables can't be controlled effectively, and ethical concerns arise, observational studies present a more viable design. In these studies, researchers document and analyze behaviors as they naturally occur without manipulating the environment.
  • Controlled randomization of participants is challenging ethically and practically in long-term health studies.
  • Observational studies are more feasible when ethical and practical constraints exist.
Implications for Health Research
Health research aims to understand factors affecting human health and to guide public health policies. When researching potential health risks like those possibly posed by cell phone radiation, methods must be carefully chosen to ensure valid and reliable results without compromising the participants' well-being.

Given that health research often deals with long-term effects and multiple confounding variables, observational studies are invaluable. They allow for the collection of data over extended periods, observing natural patterns without interference. This aspect is crucial, especially when investigating long-term risks such as the development of cancer.

Furthermore, the insights gained from observational studies can inform future experimental designs if ethical and practical conditions allow. This makes them a pivotal starting point in health research, balancing the pursuit of knowledge with ethical responsibility.
  • Observational studies provide useful insights for long-term health research without ethical dilemmas.
  • They are essential in exploring complex health issues with multiple influencing factors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Systematic sampling A researcher wants to select \(1 \%\) of the 10,000 subjects from the sampling frame. She selects subjects by picking one of the first 100 on the list at random, skipping 100 names to get the next subject, skipping another 100 names to get the next subject, and so on. This is called a systematic random sample. a. With simple random sampling, (i) every subject is equally likely to be chosen, and (ii) every possible sample of size \(n\) is equally likely. Indicate which, if any, of (i) and (ii) are true for systematic random samples. Explain. b. An assembly-line process in a manufacturing company is checked by using systematic random sampling to inspect \(2 \%\) of the items. Explain how this sampling process would be implemented.

Nursing homes You plan to sample residents of registered nursing homes in your county. You obtain a list of all 97 nursing homes in the county, and randomly select five of them. You obtain lists of residents from those five homes and interview all the residents in each home. a. Are the nursing homes clusters or strata? b. Explain why the sample chosen is not a simple random sample of the population of interest to you.

Smoking and heart attacks A Reuters story (April 2,2003) reported that "The number of heart attack victims fell by almost \(60 \%\) at one hospital six months after a smoke-free ordinance went into effect in the area (Helena, Montana), a study showed, reinforcing concerns about second-hand smoke." The number of hospital admissions for heart attack dropped from just under seven per month to four a month during the six months after the smoking ban. a. Did this story describe an experiment or an observational study? b. In the context of this study, describe how you could explain to someone who has never studied statistics that association does not imply causation. For instance, give a potential reason that could explain this association.

In a study by Karen Rodenroth, "A study of the relationship between physical fitness and academic performance", conducted among students of the fourth and fifth grade in a rural Northeast Georgia elementary school, it was found that students who are more involved in physical education class are more likely to have high grades. a. What is the population of interest for this survey? b. Describe why this is an observational study. c. Identify a lurking variable in this study.

Quota sampling An interviewer stands at a street corner and conducts interviews until obtaining a quota in various groups representing the relative sizes of the groups in the population. For instance, the quota might be 50 factory workers, 100 housewives, 60 elderly people, 30 Hispanics, and so forth. This is called quota sampling. Is this a random sampling method? Explain and discuss potential advantages or disadvantages of this method. (The Gallup organization used quota sampling until it predicted, incorrectly, that Dewey would easily defeat Truman in the 1948 presidential election.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.