/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 55 Observational versus experimenta... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Observational versus experimental study \(\quad\) Without using technical language, explain the difference between observational and experimental studies to someone who has not studied statistics. Illustrate with an example, using it also to explain the possible weaknesses of an observational study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Observational studies watch without changing anything, while experimental studies involve active intervention to see effects.

Step by step solution

01

Define Observational Study

In an observational study, researchers watch and record what happens naturally, without changing or influencing any conditions. They simply collect data based on what they see.
02

Define Experimental Study

In an experimental study, researchers actively change some conditions or variables to see what effect this has on the outcome. They intervene in the situation to test what they want to learn.
03

Example of Observational Study

Consider a study observing how much time students spend on homework and their grades. Researchers would simply record the hours spent and the grades received without altering any conditions.
04

Example of Experimental Study

For an experimental study, researchers might divide students into groups, where one group is asked to spend a certain amount of time on homework and another group has different instructions or no instructions, to see the effect on grades.
05

Identify Weaknesses of Observational Study

A weakness of an observational study is that it cannot prove cause and effect. For instance, in our example, we can't say spending more time on homework causes better grades, as there might be other factors like student motivation or prior knowledge affecting the results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Experimental Studies
An experimental study is a research method where the researcher actively intervenes in the natural environment to manipulate one or more variables. This method is all about testing effects of the intervention by controlling and altering specific factors.

In experimental studies, researchers assign participants to different groups. Typically, there's at least one control group and one or more experimental groups.
  • **Control Group:** This group does not receive the experimental treatment and serves as a baseline.
  • **Experimental Group:** Receives the treatment, allowing researchers to observe any changes or effects.
A well-known example is a medical trial where one group receives a drug and another a placebo. This allows researchers to determine whether changes in health are directly due to the treatment.

By maintaining control over variables, experimental studies can make stronger claims about causation compared to observational studies.
Exploring Causation in Research
Causation refers to a relationship where one event causes another to happen. In research, understanding whether and how two variables are directly linked is crucial.

In the context of an experimental study, establishing causation is a primary objective. When researchers manipulate a variable and observe a change in another, they can argue a causal link. In contrast, observational studies often struggle with proving causation due to confounding variables—factors that might affect results outside of the study's focus. For example, in studies analyzing whether exercise improves mood, without experimental control, variables like daily stress levels could also influence mood changes. Experimental studies, through their controlled environments, reduce the likelihood of confounding variables, thus strengthening arguments for causality.
Diving into Research Methods
Research methods are systematic strategies used by scientists to gather and analyze data. There are a variety of methods, each suited to different types of questions and objectives.

Some common research methods include:
  • **Entailed Surveys:** Collecting data through questionnaires, often utilized in both observational and experimental studies.
  • **Case Studies:** In-depth analysis of a single case or group to explore complex issues.
  • **Longitudinal Studies:** Observing the same subjects over an extended period.
Each method offers distinct advantages and limitations. Experimental methods allow for manipulation of variables, helping to establish cause-effect relationships more robustly. Observational methods provide insights into naturally occurring behaviors without the artificial influence of research settings.

Choosing the correct method requires understanding the research question: Do you need control and causation, or are you observing natural conditions? The answer dictates the approach best suited for obtaining reliable, relevant data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Mean family size You'd like to estimate the mean size of families in your community. Explain why you'll tend to get a smaller sample mean if you sample \(n\) families than if you sample \(n\) individuals (asking them to report their family size). (Hint: When you sample individuals, explain why you are more likely to sample a large family than a small family. To think of this, it may help to consider the case \(n=1\) with a population of two families, one with 10 people and one with only 2 people.)

Spinal fluid proteins and Alzheimer's \(\quad\) A research study published in 2010 in the Archives of Neurology investigated the relationship between the results of a spinal fluid test and the presence of Alzheimer's disease. The study included 114 patients with normal memories, 200 with memory problems, and 102 with Alzheimer's disease. Each individual's spinal fluid was analyzed to detect the presence of two types of proteins. Almost everyone with Alzheimer's had the proteins in their spinal fluid. Nearly three quarters of the group with memory problems had the proteins, and each such member developed Alzheimer's within five years. About one third of those with normal memories had the proteins, and the researchers suspect that those individuals will develop memory problems and eventually Alzheimer's. a. Identify the explanatory and response variable(s). b. Was this an experimental or nonexperimental study? Why? c. Would it be possible to design this study as an experiment? Explain why or why not.

A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug for treating high blood pressure. The company would like to compare the drug's effects to those of the most popular drug currently on the market. Two hundred volunteers with a history of high blood pressure and who are currently not on medication are recruited to participate in a study. a. Explain how the researchers could conduct a randomized experiment. Indicate the experimental units, the response and explanatory variables, and the treatments. b. Explain what would have to be done to make this study double-blind.

You would like to investigate whether smokers are more likely than nonsmokers to get lung cancer. From the students in your class, you pick half at random to smoke a pack of cigarettes each day and half not ever to smoke. Fifty years from now, you will analyze whether more smokers than nonsmokers got lung cancer. a. Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why? b. Summarize at least three practical difficulties with this planned study.

Aspirin prevents heart attacks? During the 1980 s approximately 22,000 physicians over the age of 40 agreed to participate in a long-term study called the Physicians' Health Study. One question investigated was whether aspirin helps lower the rate of heart attacks. The physicians were randomly assigned to take aspirin or take a placebo. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Explain why this is an experiment and identify the treatments. c. There are other explanatory variables, such as the amount of exercise a physician got, that we would expect to be associated with the response variable. Explain how such a variable is dealt with by the randomized nature of the experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.