/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 A pharmaceutical company has dev... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug for treating high blood pressure. The company would like to compare the drug's effects to those of the most popular drug currently on the market. Two hundred volunteers with a history of high blood pressure and who are currently not on medication are recruited to participate in a study. a. Explain how the researchers could conduct a randomized experiment. Indicate the experimental units, the response and explanatory variables, and the treatments. b. Explain what would have to be done to make this study double-blind.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Randomly assign participants to treatments (new vs. existing drug); double-blind by ensuring neither participants nor administrators know treatment identities.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Experimental Units

In the given study, the experimental units are the 200 volunteers who have a history of high blood pressure and are not currently on medication. These individuals will be part of the study and will receive one of the treatments.
02

Identifying the Explanatory and Response Variables

The explanatory variable in this experiment is the type of drug given to the participants—either the new drug developed by the pharmaceutical company or the most popular existing drug on the market. The response variable is the change in blood pressure levels of participants after treatment.
03

Defining the Treatments

There are two treatments in this study: Treatment 1 is administering the new drug, and Treatment 2 is administering the popular existing drug. Each participant will receive one of these treatments to evaluate the drug's effectiveness.
04

Conducting a Randomized Experiment

To conduct a randomized experiment, participants should be randomly assigned into two groups: one group receives the new drug, and the other receives the existing popular drug. Randomization helps eliminate selection bias, ensuring that differences in outcomes can be attributed to the drug itself, not external factors.
05

Ensuring Double-Blind Study Design

For the study to be double-blind, neither the participants nor the researchers administering the drug should know who is receiving which drug. This can be done by coding the drugs with labels (e.g., Drug A and Drug B) that do not reveal their identity and having a third party manage drug distribution and data collection.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomization
Randomization is a fundamental component of designing a robust experimental study, especially in clinical trials. It involves the random allocation of study participants into groups. In the context of the pharmaceutical trial described, randomization ensures that the 200 volunteers are split fairly between two treatment groups: one receiving the new drug and the other receiving the existing popular drug. This process is crucial because it helps eliminate selection bias, ensuring that any potential differences in outcome can be attributed to the treatment rather than pre-existing differences among participants.

Randomization can be achieved through several methods, including:
  • Simple randomization, like flipping a coin or using a random number generator, to assign participants to groups.
  • Block randomization, which helps maintain equal group sizes by organizing participants into blocks.
  • Stratified randomization, which takes into account specific characteristics (e.g., age, gender) to ensure these traits are equally distributed across groups.
By doing this, researchers can more confidently attribute changes in blood pressure to the medication itself, enhancing the study's validity.
Double-Blind Study
A double-blind study is a cornerstone in experimental design aimed at reducing bias. In such a study, neither the participants nor the researchers know who is receiving which specific treatment. This is critically important in clinical trials where expectations and psychological factors can influence results. For example, if participants think they are receiving a new, more effective drug, their results might show improvement due to their belief (placebo effect) rather than the drug's actual efficacy.

In the pharmaceutical company's study of blood pressure medication:
  • Double-blinding can be implemented by using labels like "Drug A" and "Drug B" on the medications.
  • A third party, not involved in administering the drugs or measuring outcomes, should handle the code key that details which drug is which.
  • Data collection should also be removed from the hands of those directly involved with participants to ensure impartiality.
  • This setup helps in providing unbiased and reliable results, aiding in a credible comparison between the new and existing drugs.
Adopting a double-blind approach ensures that the study results are solely due to the physiological effects of the drugs, free from personal expectations or influence.
Explanatory and Response Variables
In an experiment, understanding the roles of explanatory and response variables is essential. The explanatory variable (also known as the independent variable) is the cause that the researcher manipulates. In this context, it refers to the "type of drug" administered to the volunteers (either the new drug or the existing one). This is what is being changed or tested to observe its effects.

The response variable (or dependent variable) is what the researcher measures to see if there is an effect from changing the explanatory variable. In this study, the response variable is "the change in blood pressure" of the participants after they receive the treatment. This is the effect that the researchers aim to measure to evaluate the effectiveness of the drugs.

Clear identification and distinction between these variables help in:
  • Defining the objective of the study clearly by showing what is being tested and what is being monitored.
  • Structuring the experiment so that the effect of the explanatory variable on the response variable can be measured accurately.
  • Analyzing the results to make data-driven conclusions about the drug’s effectiveness in treating high blood pressure.
Thus, focusing on these variables provides the framework needed for the trial to effectively assess the new drug's impact.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Aspirin prevents heart attacks? During the 1980 s approximately 22,000 physicians over the age of 40 agreed to participate in a long-term study called the Physicians' Health Study. One question investigated was whether aspirin helps lower the rate of heart attacks. The physicians were randomly assigned to take aspirin or take a placebo. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Explain why this is an experiment and identify the treatments. c. There are other explanatory variables, such as the amount of exercise a physician got, that we would expect to be associated with the response variable. Explain how such a variable is dealt with by the randomized nature of the experiment.

A newspaper designs a survey to estimate the proportion of the population willing to invest in the stock market. It takes a list of the 1000 people who have subscribed to the paper the longest and sends each of them a questionnaire that asks, "Given the extremely volatile performance of the stock market as of late, are you willing to invest in stocks to save for retirement?" After analyzing result from the 50 people who reply, they report that only \(10 \%\) of the local citizens are willing to invest in stocks for retirement. Identify the bias that results from the following: a. Sampling bias due to undercoverage b. Sampling bias due to the sampling design c. Nonresponse bias d. Response bias due to the way the question was asked

Since 1976 the Nurses' Health Study has followed more than 100,000 nurses. Every two years, the nurses fill out a questionnaire about their habits and their health. Results from this study indicated that postmenopausal women have a reduced risk of heart disease if they take a hormone replacement drug. a. Suppose the hormone-replacement drug actually has no effect. Identify a potential lurking variable that could explain the results of the observational study. (Hint: Suppose that the women who took the drug tended to be more conscientious about their personal health than those who did not take it.) b. Recently a randomized experiment called the Women's Health Initiative was conducted by the National Institutes of Health to see whether hormone therapy is truly helpful. The study, planned to last for eight years, was stopped after five years when analyses showed that women who took hormones had \(30 \%\) more heart attacks. This study suggested that rather than reducing the risk of heart attacks, hormone replacement drugs actually increase the risk. \({ }^{3}\) How is it that two studies could reach such different conclusions? (For attempts to reconcile the studies, see a story by Gina Kolata in The New York Times, April 21, 2003.) c. Explain why randomized experiments, when feasible, are preferable to observational studies.

The journal Energy Policy ( 2014,\(65: 57-67)\) presents a survey of opinions about fracking. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is the process of drilling through rock and injecting a pressurized mixture of sand, water, and chemicals that fractures the rock and releases oil and gas. There has been much debate in the media about its impact on the environment, on land owners, and on the economy. The survey involved contacting a nationally representative sample of 1960 adults in 2012 . Of the 1960 people contacted, 1061 adults responded to the survey. The study reported that those more familiar with fracking, women, and those holding egalitarian worldviews were more likely to oppose fracking. a. Describe the population of interest for this study. b. Explain why a census is not practical for this study. What advantages does sampling offer? c. Explain how nonresponse bias might be an issue in this study.

Club officers again In Exercise 4.15, two officers were to be selected to attend a conference in New Orleans. Three of the officers are female and two are male. It is decided to send one female and one male to the convention. a. Labeling the officers as \(1,2,3,4,5,\) where 4 and 5 are male, draw a stratified random sample using random numbers. Explain how you did this. b. Explain why this sampling design is not a simple random sample. c. If the activity coordinator is female, what are her chances of being chosen? If male?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.