/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 Effect of partner smoking in smo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Effect of partner smoking in smoking cessation study Smokers may have a more difficult time quitting smoking if they live with a smoker. How can an experiment explore this possibility in a study to compare bupropion with placebo? Suppose the researchers split the subjects into two groups: those who live with a smoker and those who do not live with smokers. Within each group, the subjects are randomly assigned to take bupropion or a placebo. The figure shows a flow chart of this design, when 250 of the 429 study subjects live with nonsmokers and 179 live with a smoker. a. Is this design a completely randomized design? Why or why not? (Hint: Is the smoking status of the person a subject lives with randomly determined?) b. Does this experiment have blocks? If so, identify them. c. Is this design a randomized block design? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. No, it's not completely randomized; the living situation is not random. b. Yes, there are blocks based on living situation. c. Yes, it's a randomized block design.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Design

In this study, the researchers have separated the study subjects based on whether they live with a smoker or not. This means the independent variable (whether someone lives with a smoker) is not randomly assigned but is instead naturally occurring.
02

Evaluating Randomization

Since the smoking status of the person a subject lives with is not randomly assigned, the design does not qualify as a completely randomized design. In a completely randomized design, subjects are randomly assigned to different treatment groups without any pre-existing separation.
03

Identifying Separate Groups

The study divides subjects into two distinct groups based on the living situation (whether they live with a smoker or not). These groups are known as blocks, which means the experiment uses blocking.
04

Checking for Randomization Within Blocks

Within each block (those who live with a smoker and those who don't), subjects are randomly assigned to either the bupropion or placebo treatment. This is characteristic of a randomized block design.
05

Conclusion on Design Type

Because the subjects are grouped into blocks (based on living situation) and then randomly assigned treatments within each block, the design can be considered a randomized block design.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomized Block Design
A randomized block design is used in experiments where subjects can be divided into blocks based on specific characteristics. These blocks are sets of subjects that share a common trait that may influence the treatment effect. This type of design reduces variability within experimental groups by accounting for known confounding variables.

In the context of our smoking cessation study, participants are divided into two blocks: those who live with smokers and those who do not. This categorization ensures variability due to the living situation is minimized. Each block contains individuals with similar conditions, which allows researchers to have a clearer view of how the treatment, bupropion or placebo, affects the participants. Once blocks are formed, subjects within each block are randomly assigned to treatment groups. This randomization is crucial as it helps control for other unknown factors, making the comparison between treatments more reliable.
Completely Randomized Design
A completely randomized design is a simpler experimental design, where subjects are randomly assigned to treatment groups without any prior grouping or blocking. The main feature of this design is that every subject has an equal chance of receiving any treatment regardless of their characteristics or baseline conditions.

In experiments, this approach is often used when there are no obvious confounding variables that could influence the outcome. However, it may not be as effective as a randomized block design in situations where certain variables (like living with smokers, in our study) can significantly impact the results. Because it doesn't account for these variables before randomization, additional noise or variability can cloud the experiment's outcomes, making it harder to discern the effect of the treatment itself.

Thus, in our specific exercise, the smoking status of who lives with the smoker is a naturally occurring condition and isn't randomly assigned. Therefore, the researchers opted for a randomized block design instead of a completely randomized design to address this factor effectively.
Blocking in Experiments
Blocking is a crucial concept in designing experiments to control for variability and enhance the validity of findings. It involves grouping subjects into blocks based on a particular characteristic or factor that could affect the experiment's outcome. Once grouped, treatments are randomly applied within each block.

The main purpose of blocking is to isolate the variability due to known factors, allowing researchers to focus more clearly on the treatment effects. For example, in our study, subjects are blocked based on their living situation (with or without smokers). This helps to ensure that any difference in treatment outcomes can be attributed more precisely to the treatment itself, rather than the extraneous factor of living conditions.

Effective blocking enhances the precision of an experiment by reducing the variability within each block, which in turn increases the likelihood of detecting true differences between treatment groups. It is a vital strategy in experimental design, particularly in situations where certain variables have the potential to influence the results significantly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An agricultural field experiment was conducted by Bo D. Pettersson in the Nordic Research Circle for Biodynamic Farming in Järna, Sweden, which began in 1958 and lasted until \(1990 .\) The field experiment included eight different fertilizer treatments with a primary focus on aspects of soil fertility. Treatments were assigned to subplots with identical specifications. During the time, the yield increased in all treatments but the organic treatments resulted in a higher soil fertility. Identify the (a) response variable, (b) explanatory variable, (c) experimental units, and (d) treatments and (e) explain what it means to say "the organic treatments resulted in a higher soil fertility".

Obesity in metro areas \(\quad\) A Gallup poll tracks obesity in the United States for the most and least obese metro areas in the United States. The poll, based on more than 200,000 responses between January and December 2010 , reported that certain chronic conditions are more prevalent in the most obese metro areas. The table that follows presents a summary of the findings. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \mathbf{1 0} \text { Most Obese } \\ \text { Metro Areas } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \mathbf{1 0} \text { Least Obese } \\ \text { Metro Areas } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Diabetes } & 14.6 \% & 8.5 \% \\ \text { High blood pressure } & 35.8 \% & 25.6 \% \\ \text { High cholesterol } & 28.5 \% & 24.1 \% \\ \text { Heart attack } & 5.9 \% & 3.4 \% \end{array} $$ a. Are we able to conclude from the Gallup poll that obesity causes a higher incidence of these conditions? b. What is a possible variable other than obesity that may be associated with these chronic conditions?

Munchie capture-recapture Your class can use the capture-recapture method described in the previous exercise to estimate the number of goldfish in a bag of Cheddar Goldfish. Pour the Cheddar Goldfish into a paper bag, which represents the pond. Sample 10 of them. For this initial sample, use Pretzel Goldfish to replace them, to represent the tagged fish. Then select a second sample and derive an estimate for \(N,\) the number of Cheddar Goldfish in the original bag. See how close your estimate comes to the actual number of fish in the bag. (Your teacher will count the population of Cheddar Goldfish in the bag before beginning the sampling.) If the estimate is not close, what could be responsible, and what would this reflect as difficulties in a real-life application such as sampling a wildlife population?

Give an example of a survey that would suffer from a. Sampling bias due to the sampling design b. Sampling bias due to undercoverage c. Response bias d. Nonresponse bias

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants Researchers at Yale University's Infant Cognition Center were interested in determining whether infants had the ability to distinguish between the actions of helping and hindering. Each infant in the study was shown two videos. One video included a figure performing a helping action and the other included a figure performing a hindering action. Infants were presented with two toys resembling the helping and hindering figures from the videos and allowed to choose one of the toys to play with. The researchers conjectured that, even at a very young age, the infants would tend to choose the helpful object. a. How might the results of this study been biased had each infant been shown the video with the helpful figure before being shown the video with the hindering figure? b. How could such a potential bias be eliminated?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.