/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 104 Systematic sampling A researcher... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Systematic sampling A researcher wants to select \(1 \%\) of the 10,000 subjects from the sampling frame. She selects subjects by picking one of the first 100 on the list at random, skipping 100 names to get the next subject, skipping another 100 names to get the next subject, and so on. This is called a systematic random sample. a. With simple random sampling, (i) every subject is equally likely to be chosen, and (ii) every possible sample of size \(n\) is equally likely. Indicate which, if any, of (i) and (ii) are true for systematic random samples. Explain. b. An assembly-line process in a manufacturing company is checked by using systematic random sampling to inspect \(2 \%\) of the items. Explain how this sampling process would be implemented.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(i) only holds for the initial step; (ii) is false in systematic samples. Use every 50th item after a random start for the assembly line.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Systematic Sampling

In systematic sampling, the researcher selects the first sample randomly and then selects every k-th subject from there. In the given task, for a 1% sample from 10,000 subjects, every 100th individual is selected after initially picking one randomly among the first 100.
02

Analyzing Equal Likelihood for Individuals

In systematic sampling, while every individual in the sampling frame may initially have an equal chance of being chosen based on where they are in the list, after deciding on the starting point, not every individual is equally likely to be selected again. Therefore, statement (i) is not necessarily true for all systematic samples, as the position in the list can affect the likelihood.
03

Evaluating Sample Combinations

Systematic sampling does not allow for every possible sample combination. Once the starting point is determined, the sample sequence is fixed. Because not all combinations of samples are possible (different starting points lead to different, limited selections), statement (ii) is false for systematic samples.
04

Understanding 2% Systematic Sampling

For a 2% inspection in an assembly line of, say, 5000 items, the sampling interval k = \(\frac{5000}{100} = 50\). A product is selected randomly among the first 50, and every 50th item is selected thereafter. The process is simple, consistent, and distributed evenly.
05

Conclusion

For systematic random samples, statement (i) is true only for the initial chance of selection, while statement (ii) is false. For the assembly line inspection, we use systematic sampling by selecting every k-th item after a random start within the first k units.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sampling Frame
The term "sampling frame" is crucial in the context of statistical analysis and research. It is essentially the list or database from which a sample is drawn. Think of it as a pool of potential candidates. If you want to conduct research, your sampling frame is the group you consider, like the membership list of a club or a directory of students.
In systematic sampling, as described in the exercise, the frame includes 10,000 subjects. Everyone in this list could theoretically be selected during the initial random picking, ensuring inclusivity in the starting process.
However, after the starting point is decided by selecting one of the first hundred subjects at random, the rest of the sample is fixed based on a systematic formula. This means that while each person might get a chance to be the starting point, not every sample group can be formed, leading to limitations in potential sample variety. Understanding your sampling frame is crucial as it directly affects your research outcomes.
Simple Random Sampling
Simple random sampling is a fundamental concept in statistics. It is seen as one of the most reliable sampling methods because it ensures that every subject in the sampling frame has an equal probability of being chosen.
  • Every subject has an equal chance of selection.
  • Each unique group of subjects has an equal chance to provide the sample.
In systematic sampling, like in our exercise, only condition (i) holds true initially. The random pick at the beginning maintains the spirit of equal chance.
However, the minute a starting point is selected and a systematic pattern is introduced, like picking every 100th subject, condition (ii) no longer holds. This is because the potential sample combinations become limited to the sequence defined by the starting point and interval. This showcases a key difference between simple random sampling and systematic sampling.
Assembly Line Inspection
In an industrial setting, systematic sampling is often used for quality control, such as inspecting items on an assembly line. Imagine a factory producing 5,000 items. To inspect 2% of these products through systematic sampling, a consistent and regular pattern is used.
First, select one random item from the first 50 items (as seen in our exercise). This is your starting point. From there, every 50th item is selected for inspection. This cycle continues until you have inspected all the items planned.
  • This method is simple, consistent, and cost-effective.
  • It ensures a uniform spread of inspections across the entire production batch.
This strategy helps in early detection of issues, maximizing efficiency in spotting defects, and minimizing the cost and time spent on monitoring quality. As such, systematic sampling in assembly line inspections is a valuable tool in maintaining product standards without the need for inspecting every single item.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Comparing female and male students \(\quad\) You plan to sample from the 3500 undergraduate students who are enrolled at the University of Rochester to compare the proportions of female and male students who would like to see the United States elect a female president. a. Describe the steps for how you would proceed if you plan a simple random sample of 80 students. Illustrate by picking the first three students for the sample. b. Suppose that you use random numbers to select students but stop selecting females as soon as you have 40 , and you stop selecting males as soon as you have 40. Is the resulting sample a simple random sample? Why or why not? c. What type of sample is the sample in part b? What advantage might it have over a simple random sample?

A 2016 study (http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26451509) investigated parallels between affect recognition in mothers with remitted depression and their children. They examined two groups - a group of remitted depressed mothers and a group of healthy mothers. Mothers with remitted depression showed a higher accuracy and response bias for sadness. The authors found corresponding results in their children. Children of remitted depressed mothers appeared to be exposed to a sadness processing bias outside acute depressive episodes. This could make children of depressed mothers more vulnerable to depressive disorders themselves. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Is this study an observational study or an experiment? Explain. c. Can we conclude that a child's depressive disorder could be the result of having a mother with remitted depression? Explain.

Age for legal alcohol You want to investigate the opinions students at your school have about whether the age for legal drinking of alcohol should be 18 . a. Write a question to ask about this in a sample survey in such a way that results would be biased. Explain why it would be biased. b. Now write an alternative question that should result in unbiased responses.

Many studies have demonstrated that high blood pressure increases the risk of developing heart disease or having a stroke. It is also safe to say that the health risks associated with binge drinking far outweigh any benefits. A study published in Heath Magazine in 2010 suggested that a combination of the two could be a lethal mix. As part of the study that followed 6100 South Korean men aged 55 and over for two decades, men with high blood pressure who binge drank even occasionally had double the risk of dying from a stroke or heart attack when compared to teetotalers with normal blood pressure. a. Is this an observational or experimental study? b. Identify the explanatory and response variable(s). c. Does the study prove that a combination of high blood pressure and binge drinking causes an increased risk of death by heart attack or stroke? Why or why not?

More than \(75 \%\) of Americans answer yes when asked, "Do you favor cracking down against illegal gun sales?" but more than \(75 \%\) say no when asked, "Would you favor a law giving police the power to decide who may own a firearm?" a. Which statistic would someone who opposes gun control prefer to quote? b. Explain what is wrong with the wording of each of these statements.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.