/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 62 Comparing female and male studen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Comparing female and male students \(\quad\) You plan to sample from the 3500 undergraduate students who are enrolled at the University of Rochester to compare the proportions of female and male students who would like to see the United States elect a female president. a. Describe the steps for how you would proceed if you plan a simple random sample of 80 students. Illustrate by picking the first three students for the sample. b. Suppose that you use random numbers to select students but stop selecting females as soon as you have 40 , and you stop selecting males as soon as you have 40. Is the resulting sample a simple random sample? Why or why not? c. What type of sample is the sample in part b? What advantage might it have over a simple random sample?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Use a random number generator to select 80 student IDs. b) No, because it's stratified. c) It's stratified sampling; it ensures equal gender representation.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Simple Random Sampling

In simple random sampling, every student has an equal chance of being selected. For an exact understanding, consider the total number of students as a mix of male and female. To select 80 students randomly, we treat them as units from the total population without regard to gender.
02

Apply Simple Random Sampling

To apply a simple random sample, use a method that involves each student being equally likely to be selected. A common method involves numbering each of the 3500 students uniquely from 1 to 3500 then using a random number generator to pick 80 different numbers. Suppose you generate 23, 789, 1304. These numbers map to those specifically numbered students, and they form the starting selections of your sample.
03

Analyze Non-Random Approach of Part b

In part b, the process stops selecting once there are 40 males and 40 females. This creates a condition-based stopping rule, which alters the probability that any given student is selected after a certain number has been chosen. This means not all combinations of 80 students from the 3500 have equal probability to be a sample.
04

Determine Sample Type for Part b

The method in part b is an example of stratified random sampling. We intentionally structured subgroups or 'strata' by gender and then continued to randomly select within those subgroups until the predetermined numbers (40 males and 40 females) were reached.
05

Identify Advantages of Stratified Sampling

Stratified sampling ensures equal representation of females and males in the sample, which can lead to more accurate statistical analysis across those comparative dimensions. Unlike pure random sampling, it ensures representation from key sub-groups, which can better reflect population subgroup proportions and characteristics in the final analysis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Simple Random Sampling
Simple random sampling is a method used to select a sample from a larger population, where each member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen. This approach doesn't consider any specific criteria or characteristics when selecting individuals. Instead, every individual is given an equal opportunity to be part of the sample.

For example, if you want to conduct a survey on the opinions of students at the University of Rochester regarding the election of a female president, you might use simple random sampling. In this process, you could assign a unique number to each of the 3,500 undergraduate students and use a random number generator to select 80 students from this pool. This ensures that each student, regardless of gender or any other characteristic, has the same probability of being included.

This method is particularly useful when you want to avoid bias, as it does not favor any subset of the population over another. However, while simple random sampling is straightforward and easy to implement, it may not always be the most efficient method if the population has distinct subgroups that should be proportionately represented.
Stratified Sampling
Stratified sampling is a technique designed to ensure that specific subgroups within a population are adequately represented within the sample. This method involves dividing the population into distinct subgroups, or 'strata', based on a particular characteristic before sampling.

For instance, to study the opinions of male and female students separately, you might divide the 3,500 students at the University of Rochester into two strata: male students and female students. You would then randomly select a certain number of students from each subgroup. In the exercise scenario, you'd select 40 males and 40 females. This ensures that your final sample of 80 students has equal representation from both genders.

One major advantage of stratified sampling is that it improves the precision of statistical analysis, especially when the subgroups are likely to differ significantly. By ensuring that key subgroups are represented, this method can provide more reliable and diverse insights into the population as a whole.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is the process of collecting, reviewing, and interpreting data to discover patterns and trends. It's a critical component of any research that involves data collection, as it helps transform raw data into meaningful insights.

When using methods like simple random sampling or stratified sampling, statistical analysis becomes crucial in evaluating how well the sample represents the population. It provides a way to report findings in a consistent format, offering insights such as averages, proportions, variances, and potential correlations.

In our example regarding students at the University of Rochester, statistical analysis would involve comparing the proportion of males and females supporting a female president. By compiling and analyzing the data from both your simple random sample and stratified sample, you can gain a clearer understanding of student opinions across different demographics, potentially revealing trends that contribute to informed decision-making.
Student Population
Understanding the student population is essential when planning any form of sampling, whether simple random or stratified. The student population includes every undergraduate at a given institution, such as the 3,500 undergraduates enrolled at the University of Rochester.

This population is the target from which you will draw your sample for data collection and analysis. Knowing the characteristics of your student population helps in determining which sampling method to use. For example, if there's a need for balanced representation of specific demographics, like gender, stratified sampling might be more appropriate.

When considering the entire student population, it's crucial to account for diversity in age, fields of study, and other sociocultural factors. These variations can influence the outcomes of your study and directly impact your sampling approach, hence the selection methodology must be chosen to align with the objectives of the research.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In \(2015,\) the National Drowning Report published in Australia shows a drowning rate of 0.26 per 100,000 people in the Australian Capital Territory \((\mathrm{ACT})\). A few days ago, you read about a teenager who drowned in the middle of the sea in the \(\mathrm{ACT}\). In deciding whether to go to the \(\mathrm{ACT}\) for a beach holiday with your best friends, should you give more weight to the study or to the news you have recently read about a teenager who drowned? Why?

A nonprofit organization surveyed its members for their opinion regarding an upcoming charity walk. The survey asked, "We are considering a shift of our preannounced location to a new one this year. Would you be willing to walk from the new location if it meant that many more teenage suicides would be avoided?" a. Explain why this is an example of a leading question. b. Explain why a better way to ask this question would be, "which of the two would you prefer as a starting point for the walk \(-\) the preannounced or the new location?"

In 1995,1000 teenagers particlpated in a survey. The respondents were asked about their dream jobs. Fifteen years later, a follow-up survey was conducted to see whether people were working in the jobs they wanted as teenagers or not. Was this study a retrospective study or a prospective study? Explain.

A campus club consists of five officers: president (P), vice president (V), secretary (S), treasurer (T), and activity coordinator (A). The club can select two officers to travel to New Orleans for a conference; for fairness, they decide to make the selection at random. In essence, they are choosing a simple random sample of size \(n=2\). a. What are the possible samples of two officers? b. What is the chance that a particular sample of size 2 will be drawn? c. What is the chance that the activity coordinator will be chosen?

Carol Dweck is a noted psychologist from Stanford who believes that we should praise students' effort and not their intelligence. In her seminal study (2006), she gave students a test and then randomly divided the students into two groups. She praised the effort of one group and praised the intelligence of the other group. For their next exercise, the groups were given a choice of a challenging task or an easy task. Of those who were praised for their effort, \(90 \%\) chose the challenging task, whereas fewer than half of the students who were praised for their intelligence chose the challeng ing task, fearful of losing their smart status. a. Identify the response variable(s), explanatory variable. experimental units, and treatments. b. What type of experimental design does this employ? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.