/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 A campus club consists of five o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A campus club consists of five officers: president (P), vice president (V), secretary (S), treasurer (T), and activity coordinator (A). The club can select two officers to travel to New Orleans for a conference; for fairness, they decide to make the selection at random. In essence, they are choosing a simple random sample of size \(n=2\). a. What are the possible samples of two officers? b. What is the chance that a particular sample of size 2 will be drawn? c. What is the chance that the activity coordinator will be chosen?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 10 pairs: (P, V), (P, S), (P, T), (P, A), (V, S), (V, T), (V, A), (S, T), (S, A), (T, A). b. \( \frac{1}{10} \). c. \( \frac{2}{5} \).

Step by step solution

01

Listing All Possible Samples

First, identify all possible pairs of officers that can be formed from the list of five officers: P, V, S, T, and A. The combination formula for selecting 2 officers out of 5 is \( \binom{5}{2} \). The pairs are: (P, V), (P, S), (P, T), (P, A), (V, S), (V, T), (V, A), (S, T), (S, A), and (T, A).
02

Calculate the Number of Possible Samples

Using the combination formula \( \binom{n}{r} = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!} \) where \( n = 5 \) and \( r = 2 \), evaluate: \( \binom{5}{2} = \frac{5!}{2!(5-2)!} = \frac{5 \times 4}{2 \times 1} = 10 \). There are 10 possible pairs.
03

Determine Probability of a Specific Sample

Since each sample (pair of officers) is equally likely, calculate the probability of any specific sample being drawn. With 10 samples, this probability is \( \frac{1}{10} \).
04

Finding Probability of Selecting the Activity Coordinator

Count the number of pairs that include the activity coordinator A: (P, A), (V, A), (S, A), (T, A). There are 4 pairs that include A. Therefore, the probability that the activity coordinator will be chosen is \( \frac{4}{10} = \frac{2}{5} \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Combination Formula
The combination formula is a fundamental concept used in probability and combinatorics. It allows us to determine the number of ways to choose a subset of items from a larger set, where the arrangement does not matter. In this exercise, we use the combination formula to find out how many possible samples of two officers can be selected from a set of five. To calculate combinations, the formula used is \( \binom{n}{r} = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!} \). Here, \( n \) is the total number of items to choose from, and \( r \) is the number of items to choose. - **Example calculation:** For this problem, \( n = 5 \) (the total number of officers) and \( r = 2 \) (the number of officers to select). - Apply the values to the formula: \[ \binom{5}{2} = \frac{5!}{2!(5-2)!} = \frac{5 \times 4}{2 \times 1} = 10 \] This calculation tells us there are 10 different possible pairs of officers we could select, showing how combinations help simplify scenarios where the order of selection is not important.
Probability Calculation
Probability calculation is the process of determining the likelihood of a specific event occurring. It's a crucial part of predicting outcomes in random scenarios, like this one about officer selection. Given that each pair is equally likely to be chosen, probability offers a way to quantify fairness and randomness. To determine the probability of selecting a particular pair, we use the formula: - **Probability of a single event:** \[ \text{Probability (P)} = \frac{\text{Number of favorable outcomes}}{\text{Total number of outcomes}} \] - In this problem, each pair is equally probable: - There are 10 possible pairs, so the probability of picking any specific pair (say, (P, V)) is: \[ P(\text{specific pair}) = \frac{1}{10} = 0.1 \] This simply means that any pair of officers has a 10% chance of being the chosen team to travel to the conference. Additionally, to find the probability that a specific officer, such as the activity coordinator A, is selected, count the number of pairs including that officer: - We have four pairs: (P, A), (V, A), (S, A), and (T, A). - Thus, the probability that A is included is: \[ \frac{4}{10} = \frac{2}{5} = 0.4 \] This tells us there's a 40% probability that the activity coordinator is chosen in any random draw of two officers.
Listing Possible Outcomes
Listing possible outcomes is a helpful approach in probability to ensure every scenario is considered. It provides a clear structure, guaranteeing nothing is missed and is especially useful for visual learners who benefit from seeing all possibilities laid out. For this problem, listing helps identify the complete set of officer pairs, confirming calculations are based on full and accurate information. - **Steps to list outcomes:** - Start with a clear set of all available items—in this case, the five officers P, V, S, T, and A. - Systematically pair each officer with every other officer without repeating pairs. - Avoid counting the same pair in reverse, for example, (P, V) is the same as (V, P). - **Outcome list created:** - (P, V), (P, S), (P, T), (P, A) - (V, S), (V, T), (V, A) - (S, T), (S, A) - (T, A) This careful listing reveals there are exactly 10 unique outcomes, matching the total number derived from the combination formula. By seeing all outcomes laid out, one can easily understand how many total options are available and confirm that all calculations, such as probability assessments, are accurate.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A nationwide census is conducted in the United States every 10 years. a. Give at least two reasons the United States takes a census only every 10 years. b. What are reasons for taking the census at all? c. The most commonly discussed characteristic learned from a census is the size of the population. However, other characteristics of the population are measured during each census. Using the Internet, report two such characteristics recorded during the 2010 U.S. census. (Hint: Visit the following website: www.census.gov/2010.census.)

Texting while driving is dangerous and causes injuries and fatalities. A team of researchers studied whether typing text messages, reading them, or a combination of both, while driving affect eye movements, stimulus detection, reaction time, collisions, lane positioning, speed and headway significantly. A total sample of 977 participants from 28 experimental studies was considered in the investigation. Results show that typing and reading text messages while driving adversely affected driver control ability. Typing text messages alone produced similar decrements as typing and reading, whereas reading alone had smaller decrements over fewer dependent variables. This meta-analysis provides convergent evidence that texting compromises the safety of the driver, passengers and other road users. (Source: Accid Anal Prev, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.005) a. What is the main question in this statistical experiment? b. Identify the explanatory variable, treatments, response variables, and experimental units. c. What measures can be taken to prevent road accidents?

Multiple choice: Effect of response categories \(\quad\) A study (N. Schwarz et al., Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. \(49,1985,\) p. 388 ) asked German adults how many hours a day they spend watching TV on a typical day. When the possible responses were the six categories (up to \(\frac{1}{2}\) hour, \(\frac{1}{2}\) to 1 hour, 1 to \(1 \frac{1}{2}\) hours, \(\ldots,\) more than \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours \(), 16 \%\) of respondents said they watched more than \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours per day. When the six categories were (up to \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours, \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) to 3 hours, ..., more than 4 hours \(), 38 \%\) said they watched more than \(2 \frac{1}{2}\) hours per day. a. The samples could not have been random, or this would not have happened. b. This shows the importance of question design, especially when people may be uncertain what the answer to the question really is. c. This study was an experiment, not an observational study.

In a survey conducted by vouchercloud.net and reported in the Palm Beach Post, it was found that of 2645 people who had participated in an extramarital affair, the average amount spent per month on the affair was \$444. (Source: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/ news/cheating-spouses-spend-444-month- affair-survey-fin/ ngbgy/? _federated=1) a. No information was given on how the surveyed individuals were selected. What type of bias could result if the 2645 individuals were not randomly selected? How would this type of bias potentially affect the responses and the sample mean amount spent per month on the affair? b. The concern was raised in the article that the individuals' answers could not be validated. What type of bias could result from untruthful answers? How would this type of bias affect the responses and the sample mean amount spent per month on the affair?

Since 1976 the Nurses' Health Study has followed more than 100,000 nurses. Every two years, the nurses fill out a questionnaire about their habits and their health. Results from this study indicated that postmenopausal women have a reduced risk of heart disease if they take a hormone replacement drug. a. Suppose the hormone-replacement drug actually has no effect. Identify a potential lurking variable that could explain the results of the observational study. (Hint: Suppose that the women who took the drug tended to be more conscientious about their personal health than those who did not take it.) b. Recently a randomized experiment called the Women's Health Initiative was conducted by the National Institutes of Health to see whether hormone therapy is truly helpful. The study, planned to last for eight years, was stopped after five years when analyses showed that women who took hormones had \(30 \%\) more heart attacks. This study suggested that rather than reducing the risk of heart attacks, hormone replacement drugs actually increase the risk. \({ }^{3}\) How is it that two studies could reach such different conclusions? (For attempts to reconcile the studies, see a story by Gina Kolata in The New York Times, April 21, 2003.) c. Explain why randomized experiments, when feasible, are preferable to observational studies.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.