/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 69 The table shows the mean number ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The table shows the mean number of children in Canadian families, classified by whether the family was English speaking or French speaking and by whether the family lived in Quebec or in another province. $$\begin{array}{lcc}\hline {\text { Mean Number of Children in Canada }} \\ \hline \text { Province } & \text { English Speaking } & \text { French Speaking } \\\\\hline \text { Quebec } & 1.64 & 1.80 \\\\\text { Other } & 1.97 & 2.14 \\\\\text { Overall } & 1.95 & 1.85 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ a. Overall, compare the mean number of children for English-speaking and French-speaking families. b. Compare the means, controlling for province (Quebec, Other). c. How is it possible that for each level of province the mean is higher for French-speaking families, yet overall the mean is higher for English-speaking families? Which paradox does this illustrate?

Short Answer

Expert verified
English-speaking families have more children overall, but French-speaking families have more children in each province. This exhibits Simpson's Paradox.

Step by step solution

01

Overall Comparison

To compare the mean number of children overall for English-speaking and French-speaking families, we can look at the overall row in the table. For English-speaking families, the mean is 1.95, while for French-speaking families, the mean is 1.85. Therefore, overall, English-speaking families have a higher mean number of children.
02

Quebec Province Comparison

Now, let's control for the province of Quebec. In Quebec, the mean number of children for English-speaking families is 1.64, whereas for French-speaking families, it is 1.80. So, in Quebec, French-speaking families have a higher mean number of children than English-speaking families.
03

Other Provinces Comparison

For provinces other than Quebec, compare the mean number of children. Here, English-speaking families have a mean of 1.97, while French-speaking families have a mean of 2.14. Thus, in other provinces, French-speaking families have a higher mean number of children as well.
04

Understanding the Paradox

Despite French-speaking families having a higher mean in each province, the overall mean is higher for English-speaking families. This discrepancy can be explained by the fact that a greater number of English-speaking families may reside in regions with higher average family sizes, skewing the overall mean towards English-speaking families. This illustrates Simpson's Paradox, where a trend appears in different groups of data but reverses when the groups are combined.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean Comparison
When comparing means, it's essential to understand that the mean represents the average of a dataset. In the given exercise, we compare the mean number of children between English-speaking and French-speaking Canadian families. Overall, English-speaking families have an average of 1.95 children, whereas French-speaking families have an average of 1.85 children. On the surface, this suggests that English-speaking families have more children on average.

However, the scenario changes when we delve deeper and control for specific factors such as location, in this case, provinces. This means we look at how these averages change when considering different subsets of the data separately, like families living in Quebec versus in other provinces. Such specifics can provide a more granular comparison that might contradict the overall results. This practice is crucial for accurate data interpretation.

Thus, while considering means, one must take into account various influencing factors, ensuring that the overall conclusions reflect a true representation of the underlying data distribution.
Data Analysis in Statistics
Data analysis in statistics involves taking a closer look at the data to reveal underlying patterns and insights. In the exercise, the data is categorized by language (English or French) and location (Quebec or other provinces). These categories allow comparisons both overall and within specific groups. Analyzing data in this way helps identify trends or anomalies not immediately visible when looking at the grand totals alone.

Data analysis isn't just about calculating numbers; it's about interpreting what those numbers signify. In this exercise, although French-speaking families have higher means when analyzed by province, the overall mean is higher for English-speaking families. This suggests a deeper, underlying pattern that statistical analysis aims to uncover. Data analysis often reveals complexities like these, providing insights that a simple set of figures might not convey.
  • Understanding different variables: It’s crucial to control for enough variables to understand the true impact of something.
  • Observation of trends: Analyzing specific group comparisons can reveal unexpected trends.
With effective data analysis, one aims to go beyond the surface and grasp the fuller picture.
Bilingual Family Demographics
Bilingual family demographics provide fascinating insights into cultural and regional variations. In Canada, families that are either English-speaking or French-speaking exhibit varying family sizes based on their location, such as Quebec or other provinces. Such demographic studies help understand the dynamics of a bilingual nation.

The exercise showcases slightly higher family sizes in French-speaking neighborhoods regardless of the province. These findings can spur discussions around cultural factors, like the potential influence of community norms or economic conditions that might encourage larger family sizes in different linguistic groups. Furthermore, differences in demographics can highlight trends in migration, education, or employment opportunities that affect family dynamics.
  • Influence of location: Differences between Quebec and other provinces shed light on how geography influences family size in the context of language.
  • Cultural impacts: Cultural values may play a significant role in determining family size and structure, influenced by language and location.
Overall, bilingual family demographics are a rich area of study and understanding this can help tailor policies or community programs for different populations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two TV commercials are developed for marketing a new product. A volunteer test sample of 200 people is randomly split into two groups of 100 each. In a controlled setting, Group A watches commercial A and Group B watches commercial B. In Group A, 25 say they would buy the product. In group \(\mathrm{B}, 20\) say they would buy the product. The marketing manager who devised this experiment concludes that commercial \(\mathrm{A}\) is better. Is this conclusion justified? Analyze the data. If you prefer, use software (such as MINITAB or a web app) for which you can enter summary counts. a. Show all steps of your analysis (perhaps including an appropriate graph) and check assumptions. b. Comment on the manager's conclusion and indicate limitations of the experiment.

The table shows results from the 2014 General Social Survey on gender and whether one believes in an afterlife. $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \hline & \ {\text { Belief in Afterlife }} & \\ { 2 - 3 } \text { Gender } & \text { Yes } & \text { No } & \text { Total } \\\ \hline \text { Female } & 1026 & 207 & 1233 \\ \text { Male } & 757 & 252 & 1009 \\ \hline\end{array}$$ a. Denote the population proportion who believe in an afterlife by \(p_{1}\) for females and by \(p_{2}\) for males. Estimate \(p_{1}, p_{2},\) and \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\) b. Find the standard error for the estimate of \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\). Interpret. c. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\). Can you conclude which of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) is larger? Explain. d. Suppose that, unknown to us, \(p_{1}=0.81\) and \(p_{2}=0.72 .\) Does the confidence interval in part c contain the parameter it is designed to estimate? Explain.

Annual income of CEOs A study analyzes the total annual pay of CEOs (in pounds) for a sample of UK companies over the period \(2003-2006\) categorized according to the number of compensation consultants employed. The sample included 311 firms having one consultant and 203 firms having two consultants. Software output shows the following results: Two sample T hypothesis test: \(\mu_{1}:\) Mean of CEO total pay in firms with one compensation consultant \(\mu_{2}:\) Mean of CEO total pay in firms with two compensation consultants a. Does it seem plausible that income has a normal distribution for each firms' category? Explain. b. What effect does the answer to part a have on inference comparing population means? What assumptions are made for the inferences in this table? c. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the population means for CEOs (men and women) is \((£-370.19, £ 128.19) .\) Interpret, indicating the relevance of \(£ 0\) falling in the interval.

A study of the death penalty in Kentucky reported the results shown in the table. (Source: Data from \(\mathrm{T}\). Keil and \(\mathrm{G}\). Vito, Amer. \(J\). Criminal Justice, vol. \(20,1995,\) pp. \(17-36 .)\) a. Find and compare the percentage of white defendants with the percentage of black defendants who received the death penalty, when the victim was (i) white and (ii) black. b. In the analysis in part a, identify the response variable, explanatory variable, and control variable. c. Construct the summary \(2 \times 2\) table that ignores, rather than controls, victim's race. Compare the overall percentages of white defendants and black defendants who got the death penalty (ignoring, rather than controlling, victim's race). Compare to part a. d. Do these data satisfy Simpson's paradox? If not, explain why not. If so, explain what is responsible for Simpson's paradox occurring. e. Explain, without doing the calculations, how you could inferentially compare the proportions of white and black defendants who get the death penalty (i) ignoring victim's race and (ii) controlling for victim's race. $$\begin{array}{llrrr}\hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Victim's } \\\\\text { Race } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Defendant's } \\\\\text { Race } \end{array} & \begin{array}{l}\text { Death Penalty } \\\\\text { Yes } \end{array} & \begin{array}{r} \text { No } \end{array} & \text { Total } \\ \hline \text { White } & \text { White } & 31 & 360 & 391 \\ & \text { Black } & 7 & 50 & 57 \\ \text { Black } & \text { White } & 0 & 18 & 18 \\ & \text { Black } & 2 & 106 & 108 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

In the study for cancer death rates, consider the null hypothesis that the population proportion of cancer deaths \(p_{1}\) for placebo is the same as the population proportion \(p_{2}\) for aspirin. The sample proportions were \(\hat{p}_{1}=347 / 11535=0.0301\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=327 / 14035=0.0233 .\) a. For testing \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) against \(\mathrm{H}_{a}: p_{1} \neq p_{2},\) show that the pooled estimate of the common value \(p\) under \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) is \(\hat{p}=0.026\) and the standard error is 0.002 . b. Show that the test statistic is \(z=3.4\). c. Find and interpret the P-value in context.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.