/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 70 In the United States, the median... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In the United States, the median age of residents is lowest in Utah. At each age level, the death rate from heart disease is higher in Utah than in Colorado. Overall, the death rate from heart disease is lower in Utah than Colorado. Are there any contradictions here, or is this possible? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No contradiction; it's possible due to Simpson's Paradox and Utah's younger population.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Statement about Median Age

The problem begins by stating that Utah has the lowest median age of residents in the United States. Median age refers to the age that separates the younger half from the older half of a population. A lower median age typically means a younger population.
02

Analyze Death Rate at Each Age Level

The exercise states that at each age level, the death rate from heart disease is higher in Utah than in Colorado. This means if you take a group of individuals in Utah aged 30, 40, or 50, and compare them with those of the same age in Colorado, Utah's individuals have a higher death rate from heart disease at these ages.
03

Examine Overall Death Rate from Heart Disease

Despite the higher age-specific death rates in Utah, the overall death rate from heart disease is lower in Utah than in Colorado. This indicates that when considering all age groups together, fewer people are dying from heart disease per capita in Utah than in Colorado.
04

Identify Simpson's Paradox

The scenario described can be understood by Simpson's Paradox, where aggregated data can reveal different trends than separated data. Utah has a younger population, resulting in a larger proportion of the population being in lower-risk age groups for heart disease, which reduces the overall death rate despite higher age-specific rates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Median Age
Median age is a key demographic concept often used to describe the age distribution of a population. It represents the age that separates the younger half from the older half of a population. When we say that Utah has the lowest median age in the United States, it means that its population is generally younger compared to other states.

A lower median age can influence various factors, including economic dynamics and health statistics. For instance, younger populations may generally have lower overall health risks associated with aging, such as heart disease. However, this does not guarantee lower risks uniformly across different age-specific groups.

In the context of the problem, Utah's younger population, reflected by a lower median age, plays a crucial role in understanding how despite higher age-specific death rates, the state may still exhibit a lower overall death rate. This ties into the broader analysis of population demographics and health outcomes.
Age-Specific Death Rate
The age-specific death rate is a concept that focuses on the mortality rate within specific age groups of a population. This metric allows for a detailed understanding of how likely people in a particular age group are to die from certain causes, such as heart disease.

In Utah, the age-specific death rate from heart disease is higher than in Colorado for every age group. If you were to compare individuals aged 30, 40, or 50 in both Utah and Colorado, those in Utah have a higher chance of dying from heart disease.

Higher age-specific death rates do not automatically translate to a higher overall death rate, as the overall rate also depends heavily on the distribution of the population among different age groups. This is where the paradoxical relationship comes into play, because even with higher death rates across all ages, the overall mortality may be lower if the at-risk ages represent a smaller portion of the population.
Overall Death Rate
The overall death rate is a summary measure used to describe the general mortality of a population from specific causes, like heart disease, in this problem. It aggregates all individual death rates across different age groups, offering a big-picture view of a population's health status.

In Utah, despite higher age-specific death rates, the overall death rate from heart disease is lower than in Colorado. This might initially appear contradictory but can be explained through the mechanisms of aggregated statistics coalescing with population demographics.

The younger median age in Utah suggests fewer individuals are present in older, high-risk age brackets for heart disease. Therefore, even though within each age group the risk is higher, the number of people in those risky age groups is smaller, driving down the overall death rate. This overarching view is crucial in realizing how different layers of statistics can suggest diverse interpretations.
Population Demographics
Population demographics encompass the characteristics of a population such as age, sex, and race, providing insights into its structure and trends. These demographics significantly influence statistical outcomes, like health-related death rates.

Understanding why Utah, with a younger population demographic, has a lower overall death rate despite higher age-specific rates involves recognizing how demographic distributions impact health statistics. A younger population distribution can lead to lower overall mortality from age-associated diseases, as fewer individuals are in the high-risk older age group.

The interaction between demographics and death rates creates the scenario exemplifying Simpson's Paradox. In this paradox, the aggregated statistics can hide underlying trends seen in segmented data. A state with a youthful population can have seemingly contradictory statistics due to younger demographics skewing the aggregated outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Employment by gender The study described in Exercise 10.16 also evaluated the weekly time spent in employment. This sample comprises men and women with a high level of labor force attachment. Software shows the results. \begin{tabular}{lcccc} Gender & \(\mathrm{N}\) & Mean & StDev & SE Mean \\ Men & 496 & 47.54 & 9.92 & 0.45 \\ Women & 476 & 42.01 & 6.53 & 0.30 \\ Difference \(=\mathrm{mu}(\mathrm{Men})-\mathrm{mu}(\) Women \()\) & \\ \hline \end{tabular} 95\% CI for difference: (4.477,6.583) T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs} \neq):\) \(\mathrm{T}-\) Value \(=10.30\) p-value \(=0.000\) a. Does it seem plausible that employment has a normal distribution for each gender? Explain. b. What effect does the answer to part a have on inference comparing population means? What assumptions are made for the inferences in this table? c. Explain how to interpret the confidence interval. d. Refer to part c. Do you think that the population means are equal? Explain.

c. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean level of tryptophan in the treated versus the control group is \((-0.007,0.004) .\) Interpret. Geneticists hypothesized that one reason for a prolonged lifespan observed in yeast cells treated with the common drug ibuprofen stems from inhibiting the uptake of certain amino acids. In an experiment, they compared levels of amino acids in cells treated with ibuprofen to cells from an untreated control group. For the amino acid tryptophan, the six measurements in the treated group had a mean level of 0.0067 with a standard deviation of 0.0038 . The six measurements in the control group had a mean level of 0.0080 with a standard deviation of 0.0050 . a. Identify the response variable and explanatory variable. Indicate whether each is quantitative or categorical. b. Find the standard error of the sample mean in each group and the standard error of the difference in the sample means.

From the box formula for the standard error at the end of Section 10.1 \(\frac{s e(\text { estimate } 1-\text { estimate } 2)=}{\sqrt{[s e(\text { estimate } 1)]^{2}+[s e(\text { estimate } 2)]^{2}}}\) if you know the se for each of two independent estimates, you can find the se of their difference. This is useful because often articles report an se for each sample mean or proportion, but not the se or a confidence interval for their difference. Many medical studies have used a large sample of subjects from Framingham, Massachusetts, who have been followed since 1948. A study (Annual of Internal Medicine, vol. \(138,2003,\) pp. \(24-32\) ) estimated the number of years of life lost by being obese and a smoker. For females of age 40 , adjusting for other factors, the number of years of life left were estimated to have a mean of \(46.3(s e=0.6)\) for nonsmokers of normal weight and a mean of \(33.0(s e=1.8)\) for smokers who were obese. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population mean number of years lost. Interpret.

Multiple choice: Sample size and significance If the sample proportions in Example 4 comparing cancer death rates for aspirin and placebo had sample sizes of only 1000 each, rather than about 11,000 each, then the \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\) would be (-0.007,0.021) rather than \((0.003,0.011) .\) This reflects that a. When an effect is small, it may take very large samples to have much power for establishing statistical significance. b. Smaller sample sizes are preferable because there is more of a chance of capturing 0 in a confidence interval. c. Confidence intervals get wider when sample sizes get larger. d. The confidence interval based on small sample sizes must be in error because it is impossible for the parameter to take a negative value.

A researcher in the College of Nursing, University of Florida, hypothesized that women who undergo breast augmentation surgery would gain an increase in self-esteem. The article about the study \(^{15}\) indicated that for the 84 subjects who volunteered for the study, the scores on the Rosenberg Self- Esteem Scale were 20.7 before the surgery (std. dev. \(=6.3\) ) and 24.9 after the surgery (std. \(\mathrm{dev}=4.6\) ). The author reported that a paired difference significance test had \(t=9.8\) and a P-value below 0.0001 . a. Were the samples compared dependent samples, or independent samples? Explain. b. Can you obtain the stated \(t\) statistic from the values reported for the means, standard deviation, and sample size? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.