/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Employment by gender The study d... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Employment by gender The study described in Exercise 10.16 also evaluated the weekly time spent in employment. This sample comprises men and women with a high level of labor force attachment. Software shows the results. \begin{tabular}{lcccc} Gender & \(\mathrm{N}\) & Mean & StDev & SE Mean \\ Men & 496 & 47.54 & 9.92 & 0.45 \\ Women & 476 & 42.01 & 6.53 & 0.30 \\ Difference \(=\mathrm{mu}(\mathrm{Men})-\mathrm{mu}(\) Women \()\) & \\ \hline \end{tabular} 95\% CI for difference: (4.477,6.583) T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs} \neq):\) \(\mathrm{T}-\) Value \(=10.30\) p-value \(=0.000\) a. Does it seem plausible that employment has a normal distribution for each gender? Explain. b. What effect does the answer to part a have on inference comparing population means? What assumptions are made for the inferences in this table? c. Explain how to interpret the confidence interval. d. Refer to part c. Do you think that the population means are equal? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) With large samples, data plausibly normal. b) Assumes normality; large sample lessens concern. c) 95% CI suggests a significant mean difference. d) Population means likely not equal.

Step by step solution

01

Assess Normal Distribution Plausibility

To determine if employment has a normal distribution for each gender, we should consider factors such as sample size and standard deviation. With sample sizes of 496 for men and 476 for women, the Central Limit Theorem suggests that the distribution of sample means will approach normality regardless of the original distribution. However, without graphical evidence (like histograms) or tests for normality (such as the Shapiro-Wilk test), we can only assume normality based on sample size, not on distribution shape.
02

Consider the Effect of Normality on Inference

Inferences comparing population means rely on the assumption that data are normally distributed. If this assumption holds, the T-test and confidence intervals are valid. If not, the inferences might be inaccurate. However, due to the large sample sizes (n > 30), the inference is robust to deviations from normality.
03

Interpret the Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in means between men and women is (4.477, 6.583). This means that we are 95% confident that the true difference in weekly employment hours between men and women falls between these values. The interval does not include zero, which suggests a statistically significant difference.
04

Evaluate Population Means Equality

The confidence interval for the difference does not contain zero, indicating that it is very unlikely that the true population means are equal. Additionally, the T-Test yields a p-value of 0.000, which strongly suggests that there is a significant difference in weekly employment hours between men and women.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
A confidence interval is a statistical tool used to estimate the range in which a population parameter lies, based on sample data.
In the case of the employment study mentioned, the confidence interval for the difference in weekly working hours between men and women is given as (4.477, 6.583).
This means we are 95% confident that the true difference in average hours worked per week between men and women falls within this range.
What makes confidence intervals useful? Let's consider these points:
  • **Confidence Level**: The percentage (95% in this case) indicates the probability that the interval contains the true parameter value.
  • **Interval Bounds**: The interval not including zero suggests that men and women have different average working hours.
  • **Sample Data Influence**: Larger sample sizes typically result in narrower confidence intervals, providing more precise estimates.
Confidence intervals provide valuable context, indicating not only the estimate of the difference but also the certainty of the estimate based on the data collected.
Explaining the failure to include zero in this interval, we can infer that there is a significant statistical difference in employment hours between these genders.
Normal Distribution
The normal distribution, commonly referred to as the "bell curve," is a continuous probability distribution that is symmetrical about the mean. It's foundational to many statistical tools and assumes that data are distributed in a pattern where most observations cluster around the mean.
In employment statistics, assuming a normal distribution allows us to make valid inferences about population means from sample data using the Central Limit Theorem.
The theorem states that with a large enough sample size, the distribution of the sample mean will approximate normality, even if the underlying distribution isn't normal. Key considerations include:
  • **Large Sample Sizes**: The sample sizes for both men (496) and women (476) are sufficiently large (greater than 30) to rely on the Central Limit Theorem.
  • **Robustness to Deviations**: Even if the employment data aren't perfectly normal, large sample sizes render the t-tests and confidence intervals robust to such deviations.
  • **Empirical Validation**: Graphical representations like histograms or normality tests can further assert distribution assumptions.
Normal distribution assumptions are critical because they underpin the validity of many statistical methods employed to compare population parameters.
T-Test
The T-test is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In the context of employment statistics, the T-test helps compare the average weekly working hours of men and women. Here's why the T-test is important in this study:
  • **Hypothesis Testing**: We test whether the difference between men's and women's working hours is zero, which would mean the averages are equal (null hypothesis).
  • **T-Value and p-value**: A high T-value (10.30 in this case) and a low p-value (0.000) suggest a significant difference between the two groups.
  • **Assumptions**: The T-test assumes that the data is continuous, normally distributed (or approximately so), and that the variances are homogenous or similar between groups.
The results, with a p-value of 0.000, strongly reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference in employment hours. Thus, using the T-test in this context provides a rigorous way to support claims about gender differences in work hours.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two TV commercials are developed for marketing a new product. A volunteer test sample of 200 people is randomly split into two groups of 100 each. In a controlled setting, Group A watches commercial A and Group B watches commercial B. In Group A, 25 say they would buy the product. In group \(\mathrm{B}, 20\) say they would buy the product. The marketing manager who devised this experiment concludes that commercial \(\mathrm{A}\) is better. Is this conclusion justified? Analyze the data. If you prefer, use software (such as MINITAB or a web app) for which you can enter summary counts. a. Show all steps of your analysis (perhaps including an appropriate graph) and check assumptions. b. Comment on the manager's conclusion and indicate limitations of the experiment.

A study \(^{14}\) compared personality characteristics between 49 children of alcoholics and a control group of 49 children of nonalcoholics who were matched on age and gender. On a measure of well-being, the 49 children of alcoholics had a mean of \(26.1(s=7.2)\) and the 49 subjects in the control group had a mean of \(28.8(s=6.4) .\) The difference scores between the matched subjects from the two groups had a mean of \(2.7(s=9.7)\). a. Are the groups to be compared independent samples or dependent samples? Why? b. Show all steps of a test of equality of the two population means for a two- sided alternative hypothesis. Report the P-value and interpret. c. What assumptions must you make for the inference in part b to be valid?

Vegetarians more liberal? When a sample of social science graduate students at the University of Florida gave their responses on political ideology (ranging from \(1=\) very liberal to \(7=\) very conservative \(),\) the mean was \(3.18(s=1.72)\) for the 51 nonvegetarian students and \(2.22(s=0.67)\) for the 9 vegetarian students. Software for comparing the means provides the printout, which shows results first for inferences that assume equal population standard deviations and then for inferences that allow them to be unequal. \(\begin{array}{ccclc}\text { Sample } & \mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ 1 & 51 & 3.18 & 1.72 & 0.24 \\ 2 & 9 & 2.220 & 0.670 & 0.22 \\ \text { Difference } & =\mu(1)-\mu(2) & & \end{array}\) Estimate for difference: 0.960 95?a CI for difference: (-0.210,2.130) T-Test of difference \(=0\) (vs \(\neq):\) T-Value \(=1.64\) \(\mathrm{P}\) -Value \(=0.106 \mathrm{DF}=58\) Both use Pooled StDev \(=1.6162\) 95? CI for difference: (0.289,1.631) T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs} \neq):\) T-Value \(=2.92\) P-Value \(=0.007 \quad \mathrm{DF}=30\) a. Explain why the results of the two approaches differ so much. Which do you think is more reliable? b. State your conclusion about whether the true means are plausibly equal.

Change coffee brand? A study was conducted to see if an advertisement campaign would increase market share for Sanka instant decaffeinated coffee (R. Grover and \(\mathrm{V}\). Srinivasan, \(J .\) Marketing Research, vol. \(24,1987,\) pp. 139 - 153). Subjects who use instant decaffeinated coffee were asked which brand they bought last. They were asked this before the campaign and after it. The results are shown in the table, with computer output based on it below. a. Estimate the population proportion choosing Sanka for the (i) first purchase and (ii) second purchase. Find the difference and interpret it. b. Explain how to interpret the \(95 \%\) confidence interval. c. The software output also shows a P-value. State the hypotheses that this P-value refers to in the context of this exercise and give the conclusion of the test when using a significance level of \(0.05 .\) \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline Two Purchases of Coffee & \\ \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Second Purchase } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } First Purchase & Sanka & Other Brand \\ \hline Sanka & 155 & 49 \\ Other brand & 76 & 261 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Risky behaviors among HIV positive female sex workers In 2014 , questionnaire surveys were administrated among 181 female sex workers in the Yunnan province of China who confirmed themselves to be HIV positive (www.ncbi.nlm. gov/pubmed/26833008). The participants were divided into two age groups -76 cases were below 35 years and 105 cases were 35 years old and above. 26 females below 35 years and 54 females of ages 35 years and above reported using drugs. Let \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) denote the population proportions of females below 35 years and of females 35 years or above who took drugs, respectively. a. Report point estimates of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\). b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right),\) specifying the assumptions you made to use this method. Interpret. c. Based on the interval in part b, explain why the proportion using drugs may have been quite a bit larger for females of ages 35 years or above, or it might have been only moderately larger.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.