/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 61 Change coffee brand? A study was... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Change coffee brand? A study was conducted to see if an advertisement campaign would increase market share for Sanka instant decaffeinated coffee (R. Grover and \(\mathrm{V}\). Srinivasan, \(J .\) Marketing Research, vol. \(24,1987,\) pp. 139 - 153). Subjects who use instant decaffeinated coffee were asked which brand they bought last. They were asked this before the campaign and after it. The results are shown in the table, with computer output based on it below. a. Estimate the population proportion choosing Sanka for the (i) first purchase and (ii) second purchase. Find the difference and interpret it. b. Explain how to interpret the \(95 \%\) confidence interval. c. The software output also shows a P-value. State the hypotheses that this P-value refers to in the context of this exercise and give the conclusion of the test when using a significance level of \(0.05 .\) \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline Two Purchases of Coffee & \\ \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Second Purchase } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } First Purchase & Sanka & Other Brand \\ \hline Sanka & 155 & 49 \\ Other brand & 76 & 261 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference in proportions is 0.141, indicating a 14.1% increase in Sanka's market share after the campaign. The 95% confidence interval suggests a significant change. The hypothesis test confirms this with a P-value < 0.05.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Proportion for First Purchase

To estimate the proportion of the population choosing Sanka in the first purchase, we add the total number of people who bought Sanka in the first purchase, which is 155. The total number of respondents for the first purchase is the sum of everyone who bought Sanka or other brands, calculated as 155 + 49 + 76 + 261 = 541. Thus, the proportion is calculated by dividing the number who bought Sanka by the total respondents: \( p_1 = \frac{155}{541} \approx 0.286 \text{ (rounded to three decimal places)} \).
02

Calculate Proportion for Second Purchase

Now, we calculate the proportion of the population choosing Sanka in the second purchase. The total number of respondents who bought Sanka in the second purchase is 155 + 76 = 231. The same total number of respondents, 541, applies to the second purchase. Thus, the proportion is \( p_2 = \frac{231}{541} \approx 0.427 \text{ (rounded to three decimal places)} \).
03

Compute and Interpret the Difference in Proportions

The difference in proportions, \( p_2 - p_1 \), represents the change in the proportion of the population choosing Sanka between the first and second purchases. Calculating the difference gives \( 0.427 - 0.286 = 0.141 \). This indicates a 14.1% increase in the proportion of customers choosing Sanka after the campaign.
04

Interpret the 95% Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval provides a range of values which we are 95% confident contains the true difference in proportions for the entire population. It considers the variability in the sample data. If it does not contain zero, it suggests a statistically significant change in the proportion of people purchasing Sanka.
05

State and Conclude the Hypothesis Test

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) usually states that there is no difference in proportions before and after the campaign: \( p_1 = p_2 \). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) states there is a difference: \( p_1 eq p_2 \). Given a P-value less than 0.05, we reject \(H_0\) in favor of \(H_a\), concluding a significant increase in Sanka's market share post-campaign.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Share Analysis
Market share analysis is critical for understanding how a product or brand performs in relation to its competitors within an industry. In the given study about Sanka coffee, market share analysis was used to assess the impact of an advertising campaign on consumer behavior. By comparing the number of customers who purchased Sanka before and after the promotional effort, we can determine the campaign’s effectiveness.

When conducting a market share analysis, it is essential to look at:
  • The proportion of customers buying a specific brand.
  • The changes in these proportions over time or following interventions, like marketing campaigns.
In this exercise, you calculated the proportion of Sanka purchases at two different points – before and after the advertising campaign. By evaluating these changes, companies can make informed decisions about marketing strategies and investments.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make inferences or draw conclusions about a population based on sample data. In the context of the Sanka coffee study, hypothesis testing determines whether the observed difference in market share pre- and post-campaign is statistically significant.

Here’s how the hypothesis testing process works:
  • The null hypothesis ( \(H_0\) ): This proposition suggests no difference between the two proportions, meaning the campaign had no effect.
  • The alternative hypothesis ( \(H_a\) ): This asserts there is a difference, indicating that the campaign did impact market share.
  • The P-value: This probability value helps us decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. If the P-value is below a chosen significance level (often 0.05), it indicates that there is enough evidence to accept the alternative hypothesis.
By applying hypothesis testing in this scenario, we can conclude if Sanka's marketing campaign indeed had a significant influence on its market share.
Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals provide a range of values that are believed to encompass the true population parameter with a specified level of certainty, typically 95%. In the Sanka coffee case, we calculate a confidence interval for the difference in proportions of people buying Sanka before and after the campaign.

Why is the confidence interval valuable?
  • It gives a range in which the true difference in proportions likely lies.
  • It allows us to ascertain the reliability of our estimates.
  • If the interval doesn’t include zero, it suggests a statistically significant difference, supporting the alternative hypothesis.
The confidence interval helps us understand not only the estimated change but also how precise this estimate is. Thus, it is an integral component of interpreting survey results and making economic decisions.
Proportions
Proportions are used in statistics to describe the size of one part relative to the whole. In our coffee study, proportions help us to understand what fraction of the respondents chose Sanka coffee compared to all survey participants.

Calculating proportions is straightforward:
  • Determine the part of interest (e.g., customers choosing Sanka).
  • Divide this number by the total number of survey participants.
For example, in the initial purchase phase, the proportion is calculated as the number of people who bought Sanka divided by the total number of respondents. This provides a metric reflecting consumer preferences at a given time.

Understanding proportions helps businesses and researchers gauge the size of their market presence and can be crucial in strategic planning and competitive analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the United States, the median age of residents is lowest in Utah. At each age level, the death rate from heart disease is higher in Utah than in Colorado. Overall, the death rate from heart disease is lower in Utah than Colorado. Are there any contradictions here, or is this possible? Explain.

The 2011 Bedroom Sleep poll of a random sample of 1500 adults reported that respondents slept an average of 6.5 hours on weekdays and 7.2 hours on weekends, and that \(21 \%\) of respondents got eight or more hours of sleep on weekdays, whereas \(44 \%\) got eight or more hours of sleep on weekends (www.sleepfoundation.org). a. To compare the means or the percentages using inferential methods, should you treat the samples on weekdays and weekends as independent samples or as dependent samples? Explain. b. To compare these results to polls of other people taken in previous years, should you treat the samples in the two years as independent samples or as dependent samples? Explain.

Annual income of CEOs A study analyzes the total annual pay of CEOs (in pounds) for a sample of UK companies over the period \(2003-2006\) categorized according to the number of compensation consultants employed. The sample included 311 firms having one consultant and 203 firms having two consultants. Software output shows the following results: Two sample T hypothesis test: \(\mu_{1}:\) Mean of CEO total pay in firms with one compensation consultant \(\mu_{2}:\) Mean of CEO total pay in firms with two compensation consultants a. Does it seem plausible that income has a normal distribution for each firms' category? Explain. b. What effect does the answer to part a have on inference comparing population means? What assumptions are made for the inferences in this table? c. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the population means for CEOs (men and women) is \((£-370.19, £ 128.19) .\) Interpret, indicating the relevance of \(£ 0\) falling in the interval.

A test consists of 100 true-false questions. Joe did not study, and on each question he randomly guesses the correct response. Jane studied a little and has a 0.60 chance of a correct response for each question. a. Approximate the probability that Jane's score is nonetheless lower that Joe's. (Hint: Use the sampling distribution of the difference of sample proportions.) b. Intuitively, do you think that the probability answer to part a would decrease or increase if the test had only 50 questions? Explain.

Internet book prices Anna's project for her introductory statistics course was to compare the selling prices of textbooks at two Internet bookstores. She first took a random sample of 10 textbooks used that term in courses at her college, based on the list of texts compiled by the college bookstore. The prices of those textbooks at the two Internet sites were Site \(A: \$ 115, \$ 79, \$ 43, \$ 140, \$ 99, \$ 30, \$ 80, \$ 99, \$ 119, \$ 69\) Site \(B: \$ 110, \$ 79, \$ 40, \$ 129, \$ 99, \$ 30, \$ 69, \$ 99, \$ 109, \$ 66\) a. Are these independent samples or dependent samples? Justify your answer. b. Find the mean for each sample. Find the mean of the difference scores. Compare and interpret. c. Using software or a calculator, construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval comparing the population mean prices of all textbooks used that term at her college. Interpret.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.