/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 62 President's popularity Last mont... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

President's popularity Last month a random sample of 1000 subjects was interviewed and asked whether they thought the president was doing a good job. This month the same subjects were asked this again. The results are: 450 said yes each time, 450 said no each time, 60 said yes on the first survey and no on the second survey, and 40 said no on the first survey and yes on the second survey. a. Form a contingency table showing these results. b. Estimate the proportion giving a favorable rating (i) last month and (ii) this month.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Last month, 51% gave a favorable rating; this month, 49% did.

Step by step solution

01

Construct the Contingency Table

To form the contingency table, we organize the data into four categories: 'Yes both times', 'No both times', 'Yes then No', and 'No then Yes'. According to the given data:- 450 subjects said 'Yes' both times.- 450 subjects said 'No' both times.- 60 subjects said 'Yes' last month and 'No' this month.- 40 subjects said 'No' last month and 'Yes' this month.The contingency table is constructed as follows:\[\begin{array}{c|cc|c} & \text{Yes} & \text{No} & \text{Total} \\hline\text{Last Month: Yes} & 450 & 60 & 510 \\text{Last Month: No} & 40 & 450 & 490 \\hline\text{Total} & 490 & 510 & 1000 \\end{array}\]
02

Calculate Proportion for Last Month

To find the proportion of subjects who gave a favorable ('Yes') rating last month, divide the number of 'Yes' last month by the total number of subjects. From the table:The number of 'Yes' responses last month is the sum of the first row: 450 (Yes both times) + 60 (Yes then No) = 510.Proportion last month \( = \frac{510}{1000} = 0.51 \).
03

Calculate Proportion for This Month

To find the proportion of subjects who gave a favorable ('Yes') rating this month, divide the number of 'Yes' this month by the total number of subjects. From the table:The number of 'Yes' responses this month is the sum of the first column: 450 (Yes both times) + 40 (No then Yes) = 490.Proportion this month \( = \frac{490}{1000} = 0.49 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Calculation
The concept of proportion plays a vital role in statistical analysis, especially when dealing with surveys or sample data. In essence, a proportion is a type of ratio that compares a number to a whole. It tells us how significant a part is to its whole and is generally expressed as a decimal or a percentage.
In the context of the given exercise about the president's popularity, we calculated proportions to understand how many respondents rated the president favorably last month versus this month. Specifically:
  • The proportion for last month is calculated by dividing the number of subjects who responded 'Yes' in the first month by the total sample size.
  • For this month, it’s calculated similarly, but using the number of 'Yes' responses for the second month.
In mathematical terms, if you have "x" favorable responses out of a total "n" responses, the proportion is calculated as \( \frac{x}{n} \). This calculation provides a clear and concise reflection of public opinion changes over time.
Favorable Rating
Understanding what constitutes a favorable rating is essential when analyzing survey data. A favorable rating indicates a positive response from the participants. In a political context, such as evaluating the president's performance, the term 'favorable' specifically refers to the percentage of respondents who answered 'Yes' to the question about the president's job performance.
In our exercise, 'Yes' responses are deemed favorable. Collecting data on favorable ratings helps gauge public sentiment and can illuminate shifts in perception over time. Stakeholders, such as political analysts or campaign managers, use these insights to make strategic decisions. A change in the favorable rating percentage from last month to this month, as illustrated in the problem, is indicative of changing opinions, triggering in-depth analysis of what factors could have led to such changes.
Sample Survey
Sample surveys are a common statistical tool for collecting data and insights from a population. They involve selecting a group of individuals, known as a sample, from a larger population to draw inferences about the population.
In the exercise, a sample survey of 1000 subjects was conducted. These subjects were surveyed twice to evaluate their changing opinions on presidential performance. A suitable sample size is crucial as it impacts the reliability of the survey results. A well-designed sample survey provides a cost-effective way to gather crucial information, helping organizations or entities to understand broad public trends without needing to survey every individual. Moreover, the repeated sampling of the same subjects ensures consistent comparative analysis across different timelines.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis allows us to interpret data collected via methods like sample surveys effectively. It's about understanding the patterns and deriving meaning from raw numbers. In the context of survey data, statistical analysis helps determine how public opinion shifts, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions.
The challenge here was to summarize the data about the president’s popularity into meaningful insights using a contingency table. This table shows detailed cross-tabulations of responses over two consecutive months. By calculating proportions as we previously discussed, we can quantify the extent of favorable ratings and compare them over time.
Statistical analysis doesn't just involve calculations; it includes interpreting these results accurately, understanding their implications, and communicated findings with clarity. This comprehensive approach ensures that the analysis moves beyond mere numbers, reflecting real-world sentiments and aiding strategic planning.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Gum flavor longevity In a test to determine the flavor longevity of a chewing gum, clients entering a store were asked to participate in an activity. The activity consisted of chewing a certain brand of gum and recording how long the gum flavor lasted in minutes. Records from groups of males and females were as follows: Females: \(\quad 15,21,29,22,19,25,35,23\) Males: \(\quad 22,24,23,30,12,17,28\) Use a statistical software (e.g., StatCrunch) to perform a two-sided significance test of the null hypothesis that the population mean is equal for the two groups. Show the software output and all five steps of a significance test comparing the population means. Interpret results in context.

Change coffee brand? A study was conducted to see if an advertisement campaign would increase market share for Sanka instant decaffeinated coffee (R. Grover and \(\mathrm{V}\). Srinivasan, \(J .\) Marketing Research, vol. \(24,1987,\) pp. 139 - 153). Subjects who use instant decaffeinated coffee were asked which brand they bought last. They were asked this before the campaign and after it. The results are shown in the table, with computer output based on it below. a. Estimate the population proportion choosing Sanka for the (i) first purchase and (ii) second purchase. Find the difference and interpret it. b. Explain how to interpret the \(95 \%\) confidence interval. c. The software output also shows a P-value. State the hypotheses that this P-value refers to in the context of this exercise and give the conclusion of the test when using a significance level of \(0.05 .\) \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline Two Purchases of Coffee & \\ \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Second Purchase } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } First Purchase & Sanka & Other Brand \\ \hline Sanka & 155 & 49 \\ Other brand & 76 & 261 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

The table shows results from the 2014 General Social Survey on gender and whether one believes in an afterlife. $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \hline & \ {\text { Belief in Afterlife }} & \\ { 2 - 3 } \text { Gender } & \text { Yes } & \text { No } & \text { Total } \\\ \hline \text { Female } & 1026 & 207 & 1233 \\ \text { Male } & 757 & 252 & 1009 \\ \hline\end{array}$$ a. Denote the population proportion who believe in an afterlife by \(p_{1}\) for females and by \(p_{2}\) for males. Estimate \(p_{1}, p_{2},\) and \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\) b. Find the standard error for the estimate of \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\). Interpret. c. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\left(p_{1}-p_{2}\right)\). Can you conclude which of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) is larger? Explain. d. Suppose that, unknown to us, \(p_{1}=0.81\) and \(p_{2}=0.72 .\) Does the confidence interval in part c contain the parameter it is designed to estimate? Explain.

In \(2015,\) a survey of firstyear university students in Brazil was conducted to determine if they knew how to activate the Mobile Emergency Attendance Service (MEAS). Of the 1038 respondents (59.5\% studying biological sciences, \(11.6 \%\) physical sciences, and \(28.6 \%\) humanities) \(, 54.3 \%\) students of nonbiological subjects \((n=564)\) knew how to activate the MEAS as compared to \(61.4 \%\) students of biological sciences \((n=637)\). (Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ \(\mathrm{pmc/articles} / \mathrm{PMC} 4661033 /)\) a. Estimate the difference between the proportions of students of biological sciences and nonbiological subjects who know how to activate the MEAS and interpret. b. Find the standard error for this difference. Interpret it. c. Define the two relevant population parameters for comparison in the context of this exercise. d. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportions, explaining how your interpretation reflects whether the interval contains \(0 .\) e. State and check the assumptions for the confidence interval in part d to be valid.

Vegetarians more liberal? When a sample of social science graduate students at the University of Florida gave their responses on political ideology (ranging from \(1=\) very liberal to \(7=\) very conservative \(),\) the mean was \(3.18(s=1.72)\) for the 51 nonvegetarian students and \(2.22(s=0.67)\) for the 9 vegetarian students. Software for comparing the means provides the printout, which shows results first for inferences that assume equal population standard deviations and then for inferences that allow them to be unequal. \(\begin{array}{ccclc}\text { Sample } & \mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ 1 & 51 & 3.18 & 1.72 & 0.24 \\ 2 & 9 & 2.220 & 0.670 & 0.22 \\ \text { Difference } & =\mu(1)-\mu(2) & & \end{array}\) Estimate for difference: 0.960 95?a CI for difference: (-0.210,2.130) T-Test of difference \(=0\) (vs \(\neq):\) T-Value \(=1.64\) \(\mathrm{P}\) -Value \(=0.106 \mathrm{DF}=58\) Both use Pooled StDev \(=1.6162\) 95? CI for difference: (0.289,1.631) T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs} \neq):\) T-Value \(=2.92\) P-Value \(=0.007 \quad \mathrm{DF}=30\) a. Explain why the results of the two approaches differ so much. Which do you think is more reliable? b. State your conclusion about whether the true means are plausibly equal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.