/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 In \(2015,\) a survey of firstye... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In \(2015,\) a survey of firstyear university students in Brazil was conducted to determine if they knew how to activate the Mobile Emergency Attendance Service (MEAS). Of the 1038 respondents (59.5\% studying biological sciences, \(11.6 \%\) physical sciences, and \(28.6 \%\) humanities) \(, 54.3 \%\) students of nonbiological subjects \((n=564)\) knew how to activate the MEAS as compared to \(61.4 \%\) students of biological sciences \((n=637)\). (Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ \(\mathrm{pmc/articles} / \mathrm{PMC} 4661033 /)\) a. Estimate the difference between the proportions of students of biological sciences and nonbiological subjects who know how to activate the MEAS and interpret. b. Find the standard error for this difference. Interpret it. c. Define the two relevant population parameters for comparison in the context of this exercise. d. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportions, explaining how your interpretation reflects whether the interval contains \(0 .\) e. State and check the assumptions for the confidence interval in part d to be valid.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The estimated difference is 7.1%, the standard error is 0.0275, and the 95% confidence interval is (0.016, 0.126).

Step by step solution

01

Define Proportions

First, define the sample proportions for students knowing how to activate the MEAS. For biological sciences, the proportion \( p_1 \) is \( 0.614 \). For nonbiological subjects, the proportion \( p_2 \) is \( 0.543 \).
02

Estimate the Difference in Proportions

Calculate the difference between the two proportions: \( p_1 - p_2 = 0.614 - 0.543 = 0.071 \). This difference represents a 7.1% higher proportion of biological sciences students knowing how to activate MEAS compared to nonbiological students.
03

Calculate the Standard Error

The formula for the standard error (SE) of the difference between two proportions is \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}} \] where \( n_1 = 637 \) and \( n_2 = 564 \). Plug in the values: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.614 \times 0.386}{637} + \frac{0.543 \times 0.457}{564}} \approx 0.0275. \] This standard error quantifies the variability of our difference estimate.
04

Define Relevant Population Parameters

In this context, the two relevant population parameters are the proportion of all biological sciences students who know how to activate the MEAS and the proportion of all nonbiological subjects students who do.
05

Construct a 95% Confidence Interval

Use the formula for a confidence interval for the difference in proportions: \[ (p_1 - p_2) \pm Z \times SE \] where \( Z = 1.96 \) for a 95% confidence level. The interval is \[ 0.071 \pm 1.96 \times 0.0275 \approx (0.016, 0.126). \] This interval suggests that we are 95% confident that the true difference in proportions is between 1.6% and 12.6%.
06

Check Assumptions for the Confidence Interval

The assumptions for the validity of a confidence interval for difference in proportions include: 1) Random sampling, and 2) Adequate sample sizes so that each group has at least 10 successes and 10 failures. Both conditions are satisfied in this survey as per the data provided.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
Confidence intervals provide a range of values that are believed to capture an unknown population parameter. In practice, they offer an interval of plausible values based on sample data, essentially providing an estimated range where the true value likely falls.

When we construct a confidence interval for the difference in proportions, it informs us how much one group's characteristic differs from another. In this particular exercise, we are comparing students from biological sciences with those from nonbiological subjects regarding their knowledge of activating the MEAS.

The formula for a confidence interval includes the sample estimate (the observed difference) and reflects the standard error of the estimate, expanded or contracted according to the desired confidence level:
  • The midpoint of the interval is the estimated proportion difference.
  • The margin of error adjusts the interval width and is calculated as the product of the standard error and the critical value from the standard normal distribution (e.g., 1.96 for 95% confidence).
  • Intervals that do not include zero indicate a statistically significant difference.
In this case, the 95% confidence interval from 1.6% to 12.6% suggests that we can be 95% sure the true difference in proportions is in this range, implying biological sciences students are indeed more knowledgeable about MEAS activation.
Proportions
A proportion indicates the fraction of the whole that meets a specific criterion, usually expressed as a percentage. In statistical studies, proportions allow us to compare different categories or groups in a meaningful way.

In the given scenario, we are looking at two proportions:
  • The proportion of biological sciences students who know how to activate the MEAS: \( p_1 = 0.614 \).
  • The proportion of nonbiological subjects students: \( p_2 = 0.543 \).
These figures are at the heart of the analysis since the task involves comparing their difference to infer the students’ knowledge disparity.

Understanding proportions is essential since:
  • They provide a simple way to quantify characteristics in a sample or population.
  • Differences in proportions can offer insights that lead to actionable conclusions or interventions.
  • They serve as the foundation for calculating the difference used in confidence intervals and standard errors.
By effectively analyzing proportions, you can draw significant conclusions about the population being studied.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) provides a measure of the variability of a statistic. It indicates how much the sample statistic, such as the difference in proportions, is expected to vary if different samples are taken from the population.

The formula for calculating the standard error of the difference between two proportions ensures we consider both sample sizes and variabilities in the two groups. The formula is:\[SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}}\]Where:
  • \( p_1 \) and \( p_2 \) are the sample proportions of the two groups.
  • \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes of those groups.
The exercise provides an SE of approximately 0.0275 for the difference. This value of SE implies that there is inherent variability of 2.75% in the estimated difference under repeated sampling.

Knowing SE helps in several ways:
  • It aids in constructing confidence intervals by providing the margin of error.
  • A smaller SE indicates more precise estimates of our statistic.
  • Understands the reliability of our estimates, where less variability approximates closer to true population differences.
Overall, the SE plays a critical role in interpreting the spread and reliability of estimated results.
Population Parameters
Population parameters represent characteristics of an entire population, providing key insights into general trends and truths for that group.

In this exercise, the focus is on defining two relevant parameters:
  • The first parameter is the true proportion of all biological sciences students who can activate the MEAS.
  • The second is the corresponding proportion among all nonbiological subjects students.
These parameters are the ultimate target of our inference because they describe the population characteristics we aim to understand.

The role of these parameters in our analysis includes:
  • Serving as benchmarks for practical decisions or interventions.
  • Providing the basis for constructing inferential statistics like confidence intervals.
  • Serving as a means to translate findings from smaller samples to broader contexts.
Thus, understanding population parameters is crucial since they allow us to transform sample data into meaningful insights applicable to larger groups.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To increase Barack Obama's visibility and to raise money for the campaign leading up to the 2008 presidential election, Obama's analytics team conducted an \(\mathrm{A} / \mathrm{B}\) test with his website. In the original version, the button to join the campaign read "Sign Up". In an alternative version, it read "Learn More". Of 77,858 visitors to the original version, 5851 clicked the button. Of 77,729 visitors to the alternative version, 6927 clicked the button. Is there evidence that one version was more successful than the other in recruiting campaign members? a. Sketch an appropriate graph to compare the sample proportions visually. b. Show all steps of a significance test, using the computer output. Define any parameters you are using when specifying the hypotheses. Mention whether there is a significant difference at the 0.05 significance level. c. Interpret the confidence interval shown in the output. Why is this interval more informative than just reporting the P-value?

Refer to Example 10 on whether arthroscopic surgery is better than placebo. The following table shows the pain scores one year after surgery. Using software (such as MINITAB) that can conduct analyses using summary statistics, compare the placebo to the debridement group, using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Use the method that assumes equal population standard deviations. Explain how to interpret the interval found by using software. $$\begin{array}{lccc} \hline & & {\text { Knee Pain Score }} \\ { 3 - 4 } \text { Group } & \text { Sample Size } & \text { Mean } & \text { Standard Deviation } \\ \hline \text { Placebo } & 60 & 48.9 & 21.9 \\ \text { Arthroscopic }- & 61 & 54.8 & 19.8 \\\\\text { lavage } & & & \\ \begin{array}{l}\text { Arthroscopic }- \\ \text { debridement }\end{array} & 59 & 51.7 & 22.4 \\ \hline\end{array}$$

In the United States, the median age of residents is lowest in Utah. At each age level, the death rate from heart disease is higher in Utah than in Colorado. Overall, the death rate from heart disease is lower in Utah than Colorado. Are there any contradictions here, or is this possible? Explain.

A researcher in the College of Nursing, University of Florida, hypothesized that women who undergo breast augmentation surgery would gain an increase in self-esteem. The article about the study \(^{15}\) indicated that for the 84 subjects who volunteered for the study, the scores on the Rosenberg Self- Esteem Scale were 20.7 before the surgery (std. dev. \(=6.3\) ) and 24.9 after the surgery (std. \(\mathrm{dev}=4.6\) ). The author reported that a paired difference significance test had \(t=9.8\) and a P-value below 0.0001 . a. Were the samples compared dependent samples, or independent samples? Explain. b. Can you obtain the stated \(t\) statistic from the values reported for the means, standard deviation, and sample size? Why or why not?

Empagliflozin and renal function over time A study published in June 2016 in New England Journal of Medicine wanted to determine the long-term renal effects (measured by eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate) of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 Diabetes. 7020 patients with type 2 Diabetes at 590 sites in 42 countries received at least one dose of a study drug. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either empagliflozin (at a dose level of either \(10 \mathrm{mg}\) or \(25 \mathrm{mg}\) ) or a placebo once daily in addition to standard care. The difference between the study groups in the average rate of change in eGFR was estimated after a duration of 4 weeks. a. The authors stated that there was a short-term decrease in the eGFR in the empagliflozin groups, with \(95 \%\) confidence interval of weekly decreases of \(0.62 \pm 0.04 \mathrm{ml}\) per minute per \(1.73 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) of body- surface area in the 10-mg group. Interpret the confidence interval. b. The authors also provided a p-value that is \(<0.001\) for the comparisons in eGFR means of the \(10 \mathrm{mg}\) dose \(\mathrm{em}\) pagliflozin group with the placebo group. Specify the hypotheses for this test of comparison of means, which was two-sided. Interpret the p-value obtained.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.