/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 115 An AP story (April 9,2005\()\) w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An AP story (April 9,2005\()\) with headline Study: Attractive People Make More stated that "A study concerning weight showed that women who were obese earned 17 percent lower wages than women of average weight." a. Identify the two variables stated to have an association. b. Identify a control variable that might explain part or all of this association. If you had the original data including data on that control variable, how could you check whether the control variable does explain the association?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Weight status and wages; b) Education level; use regression controlling for education to test its impact on the association.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Variables

The two variables mentioned in the article are the weight status of women (obese vs. average weight) and their wages. Specifically, the study suggests an association between being obese and earning 17% lower wages.
02

Suggest a Control Variable

A possible control variable to consider could be the level of education of the women. Education level might influence wage outcomes, independently of weight.
03

Check the Influence of the Control Variable

To check if education explains the association, you could use the original dataset to conduct a statistical analysis. Analyze the relationship between weight and wages while controlling for education level, possibly using a multiple regression model to see if the weight-wage association diminishes or disappears when controlling for education.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Variables in Statistics
In statistical analysis, variables are a fundamental component used to study relationships and draw conclusions. A **variable** is any characteristic or quantity that can have different values or be measured. In our example, we encounter the "weight status" of women and their "wages". These are the two variables we are looking to understand and analyze for potential associations.
The **weight status** variable provides a categorical measurement (obese vs. average weight), whereas **wages** reflect a quantitative, numerical value indicating income level.
When examining variables, it's important to identify what type each variable is because it influences how we analyze and interpret data. Here are some points to consider:
  • **Categorical variables** represent types or categories, like the weight status. Analyses focus on how different categories relate to other variables.
  • **Quantitative variables** always have numerical values, such as wages, allowing for computations such as averages or other mathematical operations.
  • Understanding variables allows researchers to explore the likelihood of associations and the direction of effects.
Identifying the correct variables is the first step in assessing relationships and potential causations.
Control Variable
A control variable, sometimes called a confounding variable, is an element researchers adjust for to isolate the main effects of the variables of interest. It helps clarify whether an observed relationship between variables truly exists or is distorted by another variable.
In our study, the primary focus is on the relationship between weight status and wages for women. However, education level could be a control variable influencing wages independently of weight. Here’s why control variables are important:
  • They help to account for external influences, revealing more accurate associations between main variables.
  • Including control variables minimizes biases caused by confounding factors.
To investigate the influence of education as a control variable, you can conduct an analysis that compares the weight-wage relationship before and after accounting for education level. If the association weakens or vanishes after controlling for education, it indicates that education may be driving the observed relationship rather than weight.
Multiple Regression Analysis
To evaluate the effect of a potential control variable, like education, while studying the relationship between weight status and wages, **multiple regression analysis** is an effective method. This statistical tool allows us to understand the effect of multiple factors at once, providing a clearer picture of which variables truly impact the outcome.
In a multiple regression model, the dependent variable (outcome) might be the women's wages, while independent variables (predictors) could include weight status and education level.
Advantages of using multiple regression analysis include:
  • It identifies and quantifies the impact of various independent variables on the dependent variable.
  • Helps discern direct relationships by controlling for other factors in the equation.
  • By including control variables like education, you can determine if the weight influences wages independent of how education affects it.
Implementing multiple regression analysis involves creating a mathematical equation that predicts the outcome based on multiple inputs. This can provide valuable insights into complex datasets and support informed decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two TV commercials are developed for marketing a new product. A volunteer test sample of 200 people is randomly split into two groups of 100 each. In a controlled setting, Group A watches commercial A and Group B watches commercial B. In Group A, 25 say they would buy the product. In group \(\mathrm{B}, 20\) say they would buy the product. The marketing manager who devised this experiment concludes that commercial \(\mathrm{A}\) is better. Is this conclusion justified? Analyze the data. If you prefer, use software (such as MINITAB or a web app) for which you can enter summary counts. a. Show all steps of your analysis (perhaps including an appropriate graph) and check assumptions. b. Comment on the manager's conclusion and indicate limitations of the experiment.

Employment by gender The study described in Exercise 10.16 also evaluated the weekly time spent in employment. This sample comprises men and women with a high level of labor force attachment. Software shows the results. \begin{tabular}{lcccc} Gender & \(\mathrm{N}\) & Mean & StDev & SE Mean \\ Men & 496 & 47.54 & 9.92 & 0.45 \\ Women & 476 & 42.01 & 6.53 & 0.30 \\ Difference \(=\mathrm{mu}(\mathrm{Men})-\mathrm{mu}(\) Women \()\) & \\ \hline \end{tabular} 95\% CI for difference: (4.477,6.583) T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs} \neq):\) \(\mathrm{T}-\) Value \(=10.30\) p-value \(=0.000\) a. Does it seem plausible that employment has a normal distribution for each gender? Explain. b. What effect does the answer to part a have on inference comparing population means? What assumptions are made for the inferences in this table? c. Explain how to interpret the confidence interval. d. Refer to part c. Do you think that the population means are equal? Explain.

The table shows the mean number of children in Canadian families, classified by whether the family was English speaking or French speaking and by whether the family lived in Quebec or in another province. $$\begin{array}{lcc}\hline {\text { Mean Number of Children in Canada }} \\ \hline \text { Province } & \text { English Speaking } & \text { French Speaking } \\\\\hline \text { Quebec } & 1.64 & 1.80 \\\\\text { Other } & 1.97 & 2.14 \\\\\text { Overall } & 1.95 & 1.85 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ a. Overall, compare the mean number of children for English-speaking and French-speaking families. b. Compare the means, controlling for province (Quebec, Other). c. How is it possible that for each level of province the mean is higher for French-speaking families, yet overall the mean is higher for English-speaking families? Which paradox does this illustrate?

The following data refer to a random sample of prize money earned by male and female skiers racing in the \(2014 / 2015\) FIS world cup season (in Swiss Franc). Males: \(\quad 89000,179000,8820,12000,10750,66000,\) 6700,3300,74000,56800 Females: \(\quad 73000,95000,32400,4000,2000,57100,4500\) Enter the observations (separated by spaces) into the Permutation Test web app. Let male skiers be Group 1 and female skiers be Group 2 and let the test statistic be the difference in sample means. Is there evidence that male skiers earn more, on average, than female skiers? a. What are the observed group means and their difference? (The subtitle of the dot plot shows this information.) b. Why would we prefer to run a permutation test over a \(t\) test? c. Press the Generate Random Permutation(s) button once to generate one permutation of the original data. What are the two group means and their difference under this permutation? d. Did this one permutation lead to a difference that is less extreme or more extreme than the observed difference? e. Click Generate Random Permutation(s) nine more times, for a total of 10 permutations. How many of them resulted in a test statistic at least as extreme as the observed one? f. Select to generate 10,000 random permutations. How many of them resulted in a test statistic as or more extreme? g. Find and interpret the permutation P-value. h. Select the option to generate all possible permutations. Do you notice a big difference in the histogram and P-value based on 10,000 randomly sampled permutations and on all possible permutations?

Gum flavor longevity In a test to determine the flavor longevity of a chewing gum, clients entering a store were asked to participate in an activity. The activity consisted of chewing a certain brand of gum and recording how long the gum flavor lasted in minutes. Records from groups of males and females were as follows: Females: \(\quad 15,21,29,22,19,25,35,23\) Males: \(\quad 22,24,23,30,12,17,28\) Use a statistical software (e.g., StatCrunch) to perform a two-sided significance test of the null hypothesis that the population mean is equal for the two groups. Show the software output and all five steps of a significance test comparing the population means. Interpret results in context.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.