/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 Caffeine jolt A study (Psychosom... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Caffeine jolt A study (Psychosomatic Medicine 2002; 64: \(593-603)\) claimed that people who consume caffeine regularly may experience higher stress and higher blood pressure. In the experiment, 47 regular coffee drinkers consumed 500 milligrams of caffeine in a pill form (equivalent to four 8 -oz cups) during one workday, and a placebo pill during another workday. The researchers monitored the subjects' blood pressure and heart rate, and the subjects recorded how stressed they felt. a. Identify the response variable(s), explanatory variable, experimental units, and the treatments. b. Is this an example of a completely randomized design, or a crossover design? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Response variables: blood pressure, heart rate, stress levels; Explanatory: type of pill; Units: 47 coffee drinkers; Treatments: caffeine and placebo pills. b. Crossover design.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Response Variable(s)

The response variables are the outcomes measured after the experiment is conducted. In this study, the response variables are blood pressure, heart rate, and self-reported stress levels of the subjects.
02

Identify the Explanatory Variable

The explanatory variable is the one that is manipulated or categorized in order to observe its effect on the response variables. Here, the explanatory variable is the type of pill consumed: either caffeine or a placebo.
03

Identify the Experimental Units

Experimental units are the individuals or objects on which the experiment is performed. In this experiment, the 47 regular coffee drinkers are the experimental units.
04

Identify the Treatments

Treatments are the different conditions applied to the experimental units. In this study, there are two treatments: consuming a caffeine pill and consuming a placebo pill.
05

Determine the Design Type

A crossover design is used when each subject receives all treatments in a random order, allowing each subject to serve as their own control. In this study, since each participant consumes both the caffeine pill and the placebo on different days, it is a crossover design. Conversely, a completely randomized design involves randomly assigning treatments to different groups, which is not the case here.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Response Variable
In any experiment, the response variable is the primary focus of what's being measured. It is the outcome that researchers are interested in. In this study on caffeine consumption, the response variables are multiple:

* **Blood Pressure:** Researchers measure how caffeine affects the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants.
* **Heart Rate:** Monitoring how many times the heart beats per minute provides insights into caffeine's impact on cardiac activity.
* **Self-reported Stress Levels:** Participants record their perceptions of stress, offering subjective data on how caffeine might influence mood and perceived mental pressure.

These variables are crucial because they reveal the direct effects of caffeine as a predictor for stress and cardiovascular changes. Understanding response variables helps in quantifying the effects of the experimental study.
Explanatory Variable
The explanatory variable, sometimes known as the independent variable, is what researchers believe might influence changes in the response variable. In this caffeine study, researchers manipulate the type of pill consumed by the participants.

There are two distinct categories for the explanatory variable:
  • **Caffeine Pill:** This provides the actual dose of caffeine (500mg) to the subjects, simulating the consumption of four 8-ounce cups of coffee.
  • **Placebo Pill:** Not containing caffeine, this is used to compare against the effects of the caffeine pill, helping establish any changes in response variables that are directly attributable to caffeine.
Changing the nature of the pill is crucial for isolating the impact of caffeine as the central experimental factor in the study.
Crossover Design
A crossover design is an interesting and strategic approach often used in experimental settings where each participant receives more than one treatment. In this caffeine study, the crossover design means that every participant gets both the caffeine pill and the placebo pill on different days.

Key benefits of a crossover design include:
  • **Self-Comparison:** Subjects serve as their own control, reducing variations caused by differences between individuals.
  • **Enhanced Accuracy:** By measuring effects under both conditions for each individual, it enhances the study's precision and statistical power.
This design is ideal for studies like this one, where the primary goal is to control individual variability and assess the direct effects of the intervention.
Experimental Units
Experimental units are the smallest divisions of the experiment that apply to control and observation, and in this case, they are the participants themselves.

Here, the 47 regular coffee drinkers are the experimental units. They are pivotal to the study as they undergo both conditions (caffeine and placebo), allowing researchers to measure changes in the response variables directly attributable to caffeine intake.

Understanding the role of experimental units is vital, as they form the core of the study, ensuring reliable and valid results are obtained by carefully controlling all other variables.
Treatments
Treatments in an experiment are the specific conditions applied to the experimental units. In this caffeine study, there are two distinct treatments:
  • **Consuming a Caffeine Pill:** This treatment provides the direct dose of caffeine that researchers are investigating.
  • **Consuming a Placebo Pill:** This serves as the control condition, allowing researchers to determine the physiological and psychological effects solely attributable to caffeine.
By comparing the effects of these two treatments, researchers can better understand the true impact of caffeine on stress and cardiovascular health. Treatments, therefore, are the basis for drawing any valid conclusions from the experimental data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Bias due to perceived race A political scientist at the University of Chicago studied the effect of the race of the interviewer. \(^{8}\) Following a phone interview, respondents were asked whether they thought the interviewer was black or white (all were actually black). Perceiving a white interviewer resulted in more conservative opinions. For example, \(14 \%\) agreed that "American society is fair to everyone" when they thought the interviewer was black, but \(31 \%\) agreed to this statement when posed by an interviewer that the respondent thought was white. Which type of bias does this illustrate: Sampling bias, nonresponse bias, or response bias? Explain.

Student loan debt \(\quad\) A researcher wants to compare student loan debt for students who attend four-year public universities with those who attend four- year private universities. She plans to take a random sample of 100 recent graduates of public universities and 100 recent graduates of private universities. Which type of random sampling is utilized in her study design?

Smoking cessation A study published in 2010 in The New England Journal of Medicine investigated the effect of financial incentives on smoking cessation. As part of the study, 878 employees of a company, all of whom were smokers, were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group (442 employees) was to receive information about smoking cessation programs, while the other ( 436 employees) was to receive that same information, as well as a financial incentive to quit smoking. The primary endpoint of the study was smoking cessation status six months after the initial cessation was reported. After implementation of the program, \(14.7 \%\) of individuals in the financial incentive group reported cessation six months after the initial report, compared to \(5.0 \%\) of the information-only group. a. For this study, identify the experimental units, explanatory and response variable(s), and treatments. b. Assuming the observed difference in cessation rates between the groups \((14.7 \%-5.0 \%=9.7 \%)\) is statistically significant, is this convincing evidence that the difference was due to the effect of the financial incentive and not due to ordinary random variation?

Comparing polls The following table shows the result of the 2008 presidential election along with the vote predicted by several organizations in the days before the election. The sample sizes were typically about 1000 to 2000 people. The percentages for each poll do not sum to 100 because of voters who indicated they were undecided or preferred another candidate. a. Treating the sample sizes as 1000 each, find the approximate margin of error. b. Do most of the predictions fall within the margin of error of the actual vote percentages? \(\quad\) Considering the relative sizes of the sample and the population and the undecided factor, would you say that these polls had good accuracy? $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { Predicted Vote } & & \\ \hline \text { Poll } & \text { Obama } & \text { McCain } \\ \hline \text { Gallup/USA Today } & 55 & 44 \\ \text { Harris } & 52 & 44 \\ \text { ABC/Wash Post } & 53 & 44 \\ \text { CBS } & 51 & 42 \\ \text { NBC/WSJ } & 51 & 43 \\ \text { Pew Research } & 52 & 46 \\ \text { Actual vote } & 52.7 & 46.0 \end{array} $$

Smoking and lung cancer Refer to the smoking case-control study in Example \(9 .\) Since subjects were not matched according to all possible lurking variables, a cigarette company can argue that this study does not prove a causal link between smoking and lung cancer. Explain this logic, using diet as the lurking variable.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.