/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Bias due to perceived race A pol... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Bias due to perceived race A political scientist at the University of Chicago studied the effect of the race of the interviewer. \(^{8}\) Following a phone interview, respondents were asked whether they thought the interviewer was black or white (all were actually black). Perceiving a white interviewer resulted in more conservative opinions. For example, \(14 \%\) agreed that "American society is fair to everyone" when they thought the interviewer was black, but \(31 \%\) agreed to this statement when posed by an interviewer that the respondent thought was white. Which type of bias does this illustrate: Sampling bias, nonresponse bias, or response bias? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This illustrates response bias due to respondents altering answers based on interviewer race perception.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Bias Types

First, let's understand the types of biases. Sampling bias occurs when the sample is not representative of the population. Nonresponse bias happens when certain groups of individuals do not respond to the survey, leading to unrepresented opinions. Response bias occurs when the participants' responses are influenced by the wording of questions or the interviewer's characteristics.
02

Analyze the Situation

In this scenario, the respondents changed their responses based on their perception of the interviewer's race, even though all interviewers were actually black. This change in response demonstrates that the participant's answers were influenced by their perception of who was asking the questions.
03

Determine Type of Bias

Since the participants' responses depend on their perception of the interviewer rather than their true opinions, this illustrates response bias. The change from 14% to 31% in agreement based on perceived interviewer race indicates the respondents altered their responses due to the interviewer's perceived characteristics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Types of Bias in Surveys
When conducting surveys, it is crucial to understand the types of biases that can affect the results. These biases can distort findings and lead to incorrect conclusions. There are three primary types of biases in surveys:

  • Sampling Bias: This occurs when the sample selected for the survey is not representative of the entire population. An unbalanced sample can lead to skewed results because it does not accurately reflect the population's diversity.
  • Nonresponse Bias: This happens when a significant portion of the targeted sample does not respond to the survey. If certain groups are less likely to respond, their views will be underrepresented, affecting the survey's overall accuracy.
  • Response Bias: This type of bias happens when the data collected does not accurately reflect the participants' true opinions. Reasons for response bias can include leading questions, social desirability, or as seen in our example, the influence of the interviewer's perceived characteristics.
Understanding these biases is vital for designing and interpreting surveys, as they help ensure that the results are both accurate and reliable.
Influence of Interviewer's Characteristics
The characteristics of an interviewer can have a substantial impact on the responses of survey participants. This influence is particularly relevant in the context of response bias. The participant's perception of the interviewer's characteristics, such as race, gender, or age, may alter how they respond to survey questions. This phenomenon was evident in the study conducted by the University of Chicago political scientist.

In this study, participants changed their responses based on their perception of the interviewer's race. When respondents thought the interviewer was black, only 14% agreed that "American society is fair to everyone." However, this number jumped to 31% when they perceived the interviewer to be white. This change illustrates that respondents might tailor their answers to what they believe is more acceptable or expected by the interviewer.

Various factors can contribute to this type of bias:
  • Perceived Expectations: Respondents might attempt to align their answers with what they believe the interviewer expects or approves of, based on perceived characteristics.
  • Desire for Acceptance: Participants may respond in ways they think will be viewed more favorably by the interviewer, which can lead to inaccuracies in the collected data.
  • Social Desirability Bias: This occurs when respondents answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others, rather than providing their true thoughts.
To mitigate this, survey designers can train interviewers to maintain neutrality and structure questions in a way that minimizes the potential for bias.
Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences
Statistical analysis is a critical tool in social sciences, used to gather insights and understand patterns within data. When conducting social sciences research, such as the study of biases, statistical tools allow researchers to process and interpret complex datasets. These tools involve various techniques to ensure that the conclusions drawn are valid and reliable.

There are several key statistical concepts and methods that are often applied in social science research:

  • Descriptive Statistics: These statistics summarize data from a sample using measures such as mean, median, mode, and standard deviation.
  • Inferential Statistics: This branch of statistics helps make inferences about a larger population based on a sample of data. It often involves the use of hypothesis testing and confidence intervals.
  • Regression Analysis: A powerful statistical technique used to understand relationships between variables.
In addition to these methods, researchers must be vigilant in identifying potential sources of bias and adjusting their statistical models accordingly. By adequately addressing and accounting for factors such as response bias, researchers can ensure that their findings are robust and reflective of the true nature of the social phenomena under investigation. Effective analysis in social sciences not only improves research validity, but also aids in policy formulation and implementation by providing evidence-based insights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Aspirin prevents heart attacks? During the 1980 s approx imately 22,000 physicians over the age of 40 agreed to participate in a long-term study called the Physicians' Health Study. One question investigated was whether aspirin help to lower the rate of heart attacks. The physicians were randomly assigned to take aspirin or take placebo. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Explain why this is an experiment, and identify the treatments. c. There are other explanatory variables, such as the amount of exercise a physician got, that we would expect to be associated with the response variable. Explain how such a variable is dealt with by the randomized nature of the experiment.

Smoking affects lung cancer? You would like to investigate whether smokers are more likely than nonsmokers to get lung cancer. From the students in your class, you pick half at random to smoke a pack of cigarettes each day and half not to ever smoke. Fifty years from now, you will analyze whether more smokers than nonsmokers got lung cancer. a. Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why? b. Summarize at least three practical difficulties with this planned study.

\mathrm{\\{} T e e n s ~ b u y i n g ~ a l c o h o l ~ o v e r ~ I n t e r n e t ~ I n ~ A u g u s t ~ \(2006, \mathrm{a}\) trade group for liquor retailers put out a press release with the headline, "Millions of Kids Buy Internet Alcohol, Landmark Survey Reveals." Further details revealed that in an Internet survey of 1001 teenagers, \(2.1 \%\) reported that they had bought alcohol online. In such a study, explain how there could be a. Sampling bias. (Hint: Are all teenagers equally likely to respond to the survey?) b. Nonresponse bias, if some teenagers refuse to participate. c. Response bias, if some teenagers who participate are not truthful.

Marijuana and schizophrenia, continued Many research studies such as the one discussed in Exercise 4.82 focus on a link between marijuana use and psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Studies have found that people with schizophrenia are twice as likely to smoke marijuana as those without the disorder. Data also suggest that individuals who smoke marijuana are twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as those who do not use the drug. Contributing to the apparent relationship, a comprehensive review done in 2007 of the existing research reported that individuals who merely try marijuana increase their risk of developing schizophrenia by \(40 \%\). Meanwhile, the percentage of the population who has tried marijuana has increased dramatically in the United States over the past 50 years, whereas the percentage of the population affected by schizophrenia has remained constant at about \(1 \% .\) What might explain this puzzling result?

Two factors helpful? A two-factor experiment designed to compare two diets and to analyze whether results depend on gender randomly assigns 20 men and 20 women to the two diets, 10 of each to each diet. After three months the sample mean weight losses are as shown in the table. Caffeine jolt A study (Psychosomatic Medicine 2002 ; \(64: 593-603)\) claimed that people who consume caffeine regularly may experience higher stress and higher blood pressure. In the experiment, 47 regular coffee drinkers consumed 500 milligrams of caffeine in a pill form (equivalent to four 8 -oz cups) during one workday, and a placebo pill during another workday. The researchers monitored the subjects' blood pressure and heart rate, and the subjects recorded how stressed they felt. a. Identify the response variable(s), explanatory variable, experimental units, and the treatments. b. Is this an example of a completely randomized design, or a crossover design? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.