/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 Smoking affects lung cancer? You... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Smoking affects lung cancer? You would like to investigate whether smokers are more likely than nonsmokers to get lung cancer. From the students in your class, you pick half at random to smoke a pack of cigarettes each day and half not to ever smoke. Fifty years from now, you will analyze whether more smokers than nonsmokers got lung cancer. a. Is this an experiment or an observational study? Why? b. Summarize at least three practical difficulties with this planned study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. This is an experiment because it involves assigning a treatment. b. Ethical concerns, impractical study duration, and confounding variables are main difficulties.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Study Type

In this study, the researcher actively assigns individuals into two groups: one group is required to smoke and the other group is required not to smoke. This intervention and direct assignment of a treatment to a distinct group of individuals define this as an experiment rather than an observational study. Observational studies do not involve direct intervention but rather observe subjects in their natural setting.
02

Practical Difficulty 1

Ethical concerns are one of the most critical issues. Assigning students to smoke a pack of cigarettes every day imposes significant health risks knowingly. Ethically, it would be improper to deliberately expose individuals to harmful substances knowing the associated health risks.
03

Practical Difficulty 2

The long duration of the study - spanning 50 years - makes it impractical. Over this period, it will be difficult to ensure compliance and maintain contact with all participants. Many may drop out or be lost to follow-up, and there might be changes in environmental factors or advancements in healthcare that could influence outcomes.
04

Practical Difficulty 3

There can be confounding variables, such as genetic predispositions, lifestyle factors, and environmental influences that may also contribute to lung cancer. These factors would need to be controlled or accounted for to solely attribute the cause of lung cancer to smoking.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ethical Considerations
Considering ethical aspects is vital when designing experiments, as they ensure the safety and well-being of participants. In this study example, asking students to smoke a pack of cigarettes daily raises significant ethical concerns. Cigarette smoking is a well-known cause of cancer and other health problems. It is unethical to knowingly expose participants to such health risks.
Ethical guidelines in research emphasize minimizing harm and maximizing benefit for participants. Researchers must prioritize participant health and well-being over the pursuit of knowledge. Therefore, a study involving harmful practices, like asking individuals to smoke, would not meet these ethical standards.
To address these concerns in similar studies, researchers should consider alternative methods that protect participants while still allowing the investigation of the research question. Observational studies, surveys, or the use of existing data that does not impose new risks might be considered more ethical approaches.
Longitudinal Study Challenges
Conducting a longitudinal study over an extended period, such as 50 years, poses significant challenges. These studies follow the same group of participants over time to observe long-term effects, but this duration introduces several practical issues.
  • Participant Retention: Keeping participants involved for decades can be difficult. As life circumstances change, individuals may lose interest or become inaccessible, leading to high dropout rates.

  • Maintaining Contact: Over years, researchers may struggle to maintain updated contact information and ensure participants provide necessary data regularly.

  • Environmental Changes: Over 50 years, societal, technological, and environmental changes can introduce new variables that affect outcomes, complicating data analysis.
Researchers must carefully plan and implement strategies to address these challenges. Regular communication, engagement activities, and incentives can help keep participants involved. Additionally, considering shorter time frames for the study may increase feasibility and reduce the risk of high dropout rates.
Confounding Variables
In research, confounding variables are external factors that might influence the outcome, creating a false association between the studied variables. In experiments investigating the link between smoking and lung cancer, numerous potential confounding factors could impact results.
  • Genetic Predispositions: Some individuals may have genetic factors making them more susceptible to cancer, regardless of smoking habits.

  • Lifestyle Factors: Diet, physical activity, and exposure to other pollutants might also contribute to cancer risk.

  • Environmental Influences: Living conditions and levels of pollution can vary greatly, influencing health outcomes.
To ensure that outcomes are primarily attributed to the factor under study (smoking, in this case), researchers need to control for these potential confounders. This can be achieved through careful research design, statistical adjustments, or by using control groups to account for variability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cell phones If you want to conduct a study with humans to see if cell phone use makes brain cancer more likely, explain why an observational study is more realistic than an experiment.

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants, continued In the previous exercise, we considered how showing each baby in the study the two videos in the same order might create a bias. In fact, of the 16 babies in the study, half were shown the videos in one order while the other half was shown the videos in the opposite order. Explain how to use the table of random digits to randomly divide the 16 infants into two groups of 8 .

School testing for drugs Example 3 discussed a study comparing high schools that tested for drugs with high schools that did not test for drugs, finding similar levels of student drug use in each. State a potential lurking variable that could affect the results of such a study. Describe what the effect could be.

Identify the bias A newspaper designs a survey to estimate the proportion of the population willing to invest in the stock market. It takes a list of the 1000 people who have subscribed to the paper the longest and sends each of them a questionnaire that asks, "Given the extremely volatile performance of the stock market as of late, are you willing to invest in stocks to save for retirement?" After analyzing result from the 50 people who reply, they report that only \(10 \%\) of the local citizens are willing to invest in stocks for retirement. Identify the bias that results from the following: a. Sampling bias due to undercoverage b. Sampling bias due to the sampling design c. Nonresponse bias d. Response bias due to the way the question was asked

Comparing polls The following table shows the result of the 2008 presidential election along with the vote predicted by several organizations in the days before the election. The sample sizes were typically about 1000 to 2000 people. The percentages for each poll do not sum to 100 because of voters who indicated they were undecided or preferred another candidate. a. Treating the sample sizes as 1000 each, find the approximate margin of error. b. Do most of the predictions fall within the margin of error of the actual vote percentages? \(\quad\) Considering the relative sizes of the sample and the population and the undecided factor, would you say that these polls had good accuracy? $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { Predicted Vote } & & \\ \hline \text { Poll } & \text { Obama } & \text { McCain } \\ \hline \text { Gallup/USA Today } & 55 & 44 \\ \text { Harris } & 52 & 44 \\ \text { ABC/Wash Post } & 53 & 44 \\ \text { CBS } & 51 & 42 \\ \text { NBC/WSJ } & 51 & 43 \\ \text { Pew Research } & 52 & 46 \\ \text { Actual vote } & 52.7 & 46.0 \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.