/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 99 Distinguish helping and hinderin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants, continued In the previous exercise, we considered how showing each baby in the study the two videos in the same order might create a bias. In fact, of the 16 babies in the study, half were shown the videos in one order while the other half was shown the videos in the opposite order. Explain how to use the table of random digits to randomly divide the 16 infants into two groups of 8 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
Divide infants into two groups of 8 using random digits to ensure unbiased assignment.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Task

We need to divide 16 infants into two equal groups of 8. To do this, we can use a table of random digits. The task aims to ensure randomization, reducing bias when showing two different sequences of videos to each group.
02

Assign Numbers to Infants

Assign each of the 16 infants a unique number from 01 to 16. This ensures that each infant can be easily tracked and randomly selected from the table.
03

Utilize the Table of Random Digits

Use a table of random digits to select the infants. Read pairs of digits from the table, since we are working with numbers from 01 to 16. Ignore any pairs that result in numbers greater than 16 or have already been selected.
04

Select the First Group from Random Pairs

Continue selecting valid pairs from the table until you have 8 unique numbers. These numbers will represent the first group of infants who will watch the videos in the first sequence order.
05

Form the Second Group

The remaining unselected numbers (from 01 to 16) will form the second group of 8 infants. These infants will watch the videos in the opposite order of the first group.
06

Verify Randomization

Check to ensure each group has exactly 8 infants and that no duplicate or invalid numbers have been chosen. This step is crucial to ensure the fairness and randomness of the grouping.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Digits Table
The use of a random digits table is a straightforward method to ensure randomization in experimental design. It's like drawing names from a hat but numerically.
To employ this method, each participant—in this case, each infant—is assigned a unique number. Since we have 16 infants, you would label them from 01 to 16. The random digits table is essentially a sequence of random numbers organized in rows and columns. You will read these numbers in pairs because each participant has a two-digit label.
As you go through the table, you will select numbers to create groups. Ignore any number that is outside the range of 01 to 16, or if it is already chosen. This practice ensures that each selection remains truly random and no participant ends up in two groups. Since the numbers are chosen at random, the process helps maintain fairness and unpredictability, two crucial components for reducing bias in experiments.
Reducing Bias
Reducing bias in experimental studies is crucial for obtaining reliable results. Bias occurs when there is a systematic error in the experiment, potentially skewing your findings.
  • Randomizing the sample as described helps in fair distribution between groups.
  • It ensures each group is comparable and that no other factor is influencing the outcomes.
  • In our case with infants, randomization minimizes the likelihood that differences in video presentation order would affect the results.
The elimination of bias guarantees that any observable effects are due solely to the experimental conditions and not extraneous variables. This principle of reducing bias is fundamental to sound scientific practices, providing more trustworthy conclusions.
Experimental Groups
Creating experimental groups is about dividing subjects so each group can reliably compare results. This concept is central to most scientific studies as it allows hypothesis testing. In the context of the infant study, each group of 8 infants represents an experimental unit.
Each unit will experience a distinct order of video presentation, allowing researchers to observe effects that may arise due to this variable.
With half of the infants seeing one version and the other half seeing the opposite version, any difference in reaction can be attributed to the change. This division is essential for evaluating the effects of differing conditions accurately. By ensuring these groups are formed randomly, the study gains robustness, enhancing the dependability of its conclusions.
Infant Study
Conducting experiments involving infants presents unique challenges and considerations. Infants, being non-verbal and with limited motor skills, require researchers to measure more subtle cues and responses, such as gazing patterns, facial expressions, or gestures.
  • Infant studies must account for this variety of non-verbal responses which are critical data points.
  • In our study, understanding how infants respond to two video sequences can provide insights into infant learning and perception.
  • Randomization, as described, is especially crucial to maintain the integrity of the data, unaffected by systematic bias.
When studying such a group, ethical considerations also come into play since the subjects cannot give consent nor fully understand the study, hence proceedings must follow strict ethical guidelines to safeguard their well-being.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Baseball under a full moon During a baseball game between the Boston Brouhahas and the Minnesota Meddlers, the broadcaster mentions that the away team has won "13 consecutive meetings between the two teams played on nights with a full moon." a. Is the broadcaster's comment based on observational or experimental data? b. The current game is being played in Boston. Should the Boston Brouhahas be concerned about the recent full moon trend?

Breast-cancer screening A study published in 2010 in the New England Journal of Medicine discusses a breastcancer screening program that began in Norway in 1996 and was expanded geographically through \(2005 .\) Women in the study were offered mammography screening every two years. The goal of the study was to compare incidencebased rates of death from breast cancer across four groups: 1\. Women who from 1996 through 2005 were living in countries with screening. 2\. Women who from 1996 through 2005 were living in countries without screening. 3\. A historical-comparison group who lived in screening countries from 1986 through \(1995 .\) 4\. A historical-comparison group who lived in nonscreening countries from 1986 through 1995 . Data were analyzed for 40,075 women. Rates of death were reduced in the screening group as compared to the historical screening group, and also in the nonscreening group as compared to the historical nonscreening group. a. Is this an observational or experimental study? b. Identify the explanatory and response variable(s). c. Does the study prove that being offered mammography screening causes a reduction in death rates associated with breast cancer? Why or why not?

Margin of error and \(n\) The Gallup poll in Example 6 reported that during March \(2011,60 \%\) of Americans favored offshore drilling as a means of reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil. The poll was based on the responses of \(n=1021\) individuals, and resulted in a margin of error of approximately \(3 \%\). Find the approximate margin of error had the poll been based on a sample of size (a) \(n=100,\) (b) \(n=400\), and (c) \(n=1600\). Explain how the margin of error changes as \(n\) increases.

Comparing female and male students You plan to sample from the 3500 undergraduate students who are enrolled at the University of Rochester to compare the proportions of female and male students who would like to see the United States have a female president. a. Describe the steps for how you would proceed, if you plan a simple random sample of 80 students. Illustrate, by picking the first three students for the sample. b. Suppose that you use random numbers to select students, but stop selecting females as soon as you have \(40,\) and you stop selecting males as soon as you have \(40 .\) Is the resulting sample a simple random sample? Why or why not? c. What type of sample is the sample in part b? What advantage might it have over a simple random sample?

Colds and vitamin \(\mathbf{C}\) For some time there has been debate about whether regular large doses of vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) reduce the chance of getting a common cold. a. Explain how you could design an experiment to test this. Describe all parts of the experiment, including (i) what the treatments are, (ii) how you assign subjects to the treatments, and (iii) how you could make the study double-blind. b. An observational study indicates that people who take vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) regularly get fewer colds, on the average. Explain why these results could be misleading.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.