/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 100 Distinguish helping and hinderin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants, continued Fourteen of the 16 infants in the Yale study elected to play with a toy resembling the helpful figure as opposed to one resembling the hindering figure. Is this convincing evidence that infants tend to prefer the helpful figure? Use the Simulating the Probability of Head with a Fair Coin applet to investigate the approximate likelihood of the observed results of 14 out of 16 infants choosing the helpful figure, if in fact infants are indifferent between the two figures. To perform a simulation, set \(n=1,\) push the flip button 16 times and observe how often you obtain a head out of 16 tosses. Repeat this simulation for a total of 10 simulations. Out of the 10 simulations, how often did you obtain 14 or more heads out of 16 tosses? Are your results convincing evidence that infants actually tend to exhibit a preference?

Short Answer

Expert verified
If 14 or more heads are rare in the simulations, it supports infants' preference for the helpful figure.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Experiment Setup

In the given experiment, there are 16 infants and each infant prefers between two figures. We need to find out if infants show a preference for the 'helpful' figure over the 'hindering' figure. Out of the 16, 14 infants chose the helpful figure.
02

Determine the Hypothesis

Our null hypothesis ( H_0 ) is that infants have no preference, meaning there is a 50% chance of picking either figure. The alternative hypothesis ( H_A ) is that infants prefer the helpful figure.
03

Set Up the Simulation

We'll simulate this scenario as if we're flipping a fair coin with each flip representing a choice between figures. Set n = 1 and perform 16 coin flips (simulating 16 infants). Each simulation run will count how many times the 'heads' (helpful figure) appear.
04

Perform the Simulations

Conduct 10 sets of simulations, each involving 16 flips, to observe how often the 'heads' appear. Record the number of heads from each set to see how many times we get 14 or more heads.
05

Observe Simulation Results

Count how many of the 10 simulations resulted in 14 or more heads out of 16 flips. This represents the number of times 14 or more infants preferred the helpful figure under the assumption of no preference.
06

Analyze the Results

Check if the outcome of having 14 or more heads is frequent. If it happens rarely (e.g., 1 or 2 times out of 10), then there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting preference.
07

Conclusion

Based on the frequency of obtaining 14 or more heads, decide if the evidence is convincing enough to claim that infants exhibit a preference for the helpful figure.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical simulation
Statistical simulation is a technique used to understand the behavior of a system by performing experiments on a mathematical model. In the context of hypothesis testing, simulation helps us estimate the probabilities of various outcomes under specific conditions.

In this exercise, we simulate the process of infants choosing between two figures by using coin flips. Each flip serves as a simple model for an infant's choice, with heads representing the choice of the helpful figure and tails for the hindering figure. By conducting multiple simulations, we can gather evidence to assess the likelihood of observing the results we did, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Through simulation, we generate many possible outcomes and can observe how frequently something as extreme or more extreme than the observed data occurs. This gives us a tangible way to assess statistical significance.
Null hypothesis
The null hypothesis ( H_0 ) is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing. It assumes that there is no effect or no difference in the general population. It's a skeptical viewpoint meant to be challenged by evidence.

In this experiment, the null hypothesis posits that infants have no inherent preference when choosing between the helpful and hindering figures. In other words, it assumes that the choice is random, like a 50-50 coin flip.

This hypothesis serves as a point of comparison. If our observed data shows a significant deviation from what we would expect under the null hypothesis, we might consider rejecting it in favor of an alternative hypothesis. The null remains our default assumption unless shown otherwise by the results of our simulation.
Alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis ( H_A ) offers a direct contrast to the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is an effect or a significant difference that disagrees with the null assumption.

In our study, the alternative hypothesis suggests that infants do exhibit a preference for the helpful figure over the hindering one. If the probability of getting a result like 14 out of 16 infants choosing the helpful figure is very low under the null hypothesis, this alternative can become more plausible.

The aim of our analysis is to determine whether the data provides enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. Thus, the alternative hypothesis becomes a competitive theory we may accept if our simulations indicate that the null hypothesis is unlikely.
Probability
Probability is the measure of the likelihood that an event will occur. In hypothesis testing, probability helps us decide whether our results are statistically significant.

When we run our simulations, we look for how often certain outcomes occur. Specifically, we aim to see the probability of obtaining 14 or more heads (helpful picks) out of 16 flips if the choice is truly random. The 50% probability for each choice represents the expected likelihood under the null hypothesis.

If our simulated results show that achieving such an outcome is highly improbable under the assumption of indifference (the null hypothesis), we might conclude that our observed data is indeed significant. Understanding these probabilities allows us to make informed decisions about our hypotheses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling from a directory A local telephone directory has 50,000 names, 100 per page for 500 pages. Explaining how you found and used random numbers, select 10 numbers to identify subjects for a simple random sample of 10 names.

Poker as a profession? Tony's mother is extremely proud that her son will graduate college in a few months. She expresses concern, however, when Tony tells her that following graduation, he plans to move to Las Vegas to become a professional poker player. He mentions that his friend Nick did so and is now earning more than a million dollars per year. Should Tony's anecdotal evidence about Nick soothe his mother's concern?

Sampling your fellow students You are assigned to direct a study on your campus to discover factors that are associated with strong academic performance. You decide to identify 20 students who have perfect GPAs of 4.0 , and then measure explanatory variables for them that you think may be important, such as high school GPA and average amount of time spent studying per day. a. Explain what is wrong with this study design. b. Describe a study design that would provide more useful information.

Quota sampling An interviewer stands at a street corner and conducts interviews until obtaining a quota in various groups representing the relative sizes of the groups in the population. For instance, the quota might be 50 factory workers, 100 housewives, 60 elderly people, 30 Hispanics, and so forth. This is called quota sampling. Is this a random sampling method? Explain, and discuss potential advantages or disadvantages of this method. (The Gallup organization used quota sampling until it predicted, incorrectly, that Dewey would easily defeat Truman in the 1948 presidential election.)

Aspirin prevents heart attacks? During the 1980 s approx imately 22,000 physicians over the age of 40 agreed to participate in a long-term study called the Physicians' Health Study. One question investigated was whether aspirin help to lower the rate of heart attacks. The physicians were randomly assigned to take aspirin or take placebo. a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable. b. Explain why this is an experiment, and identify the treatments. c. There are other explanatory variables, such as the amount of exercise a physician got, that we would expect to be associated with the response variable. Explain how such a variable is dealt with by the randomized nature of the experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.