/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 52 Two factors helpful? A two-facto... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Two factors helpful? A two-factor experiment designed to compare two diets and to analyze whether results depend on gender randomly assigns 20 men and 20 women to the two diets, 10 of each to each diet. After three months the sample mean weight losses are as shown in the table. Caffeine jolt A study (Psychosomatic Medicine 2002 ; \(64: 593-603)\) claimed that people who consume caffeine regularly may experience higher stress and higher blood pressure. In the experiment, 47 regular coffee drinkers consumed 500 milligrams of caffeine in a pill form (equivalent to four 8 -oz cups) during one workday, and a placebo pill during another workday. The researchers monitored the subjects' blood pressure and heart rate, and the subjects recorded how stressed they felt. a. Identify the response variable(s), explanatory variable, experimental units, and the treatments. b. Is this an example of a completely randomized design, or a crossover design? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Response: blood pressure, heart rate, stress; Explanatory: caffeine vs. placebo; Units: 47 participants; Treatments: caffeine and placebo. b. It's a crossover design.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Response Variable(s)

The response variables are the outcomes that are being measured. In this exercise, the response variables are the blood pressure and heart rate of the subjects, along with their self-reported stress levels.
02

Identify Explanatory Variable

The explanatory variable is the variable manipulated by the researcher to observe its effect on the response variables. Here, the explanatory variable is the consumption of caffeine in pill form versus a placebo pill.
03

Identify Experimental Units

The experimental units are the individuals or items that are being studied. In this experiment, the experimental units are the 47 regular coffee drinkers who participate in the study.
04

Determine the Treatments

The treatments are the different conditions applied to the experimental units. Here, the treatments consist of consuming a caffeine pill (500 milligrams of caffeine) and consuming a placebo pill.
05

Classify the Design

This is a crossover design because each subject receives both treatments (caffeine and placebo) on different occasions, and their responses are compared.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Response Variable
In any experiment, the response variable is crucial as it represents the outcome or the effect that the researchers are interested in measuring. For the study regarding caffeine consumption, the response variables are the participants' blood pressure and heart rate, as well as their self-reported stress levels. These are the dependent variables since they are presumed to change in response to the manipulation of other variables. By carefully measuring these outcomes, researchers can assess the impact of the independent variable on these health indicators.
Explanatory Variable
The explanatory variable is what the experimenter manipulates to determine if it causes any changes in the response variables. In this particular study, the explanatory variable is the type of pill consumed by the participants – either a caffeine pill or a placebo. By changing this variable, researchers aim to ascertain its direct impact on the response, which includes physiological metrics like blood pressure and psychological aspects like stress levels. Understanding the role of the explanatory variable is key in establishing causation versus correlation in experimental analysis.
Crossover Design
A crossover design is a type of experimental setup where participants are exposed to more than one treatment in a sequential manner. In this caffeine study, each subject receives both the caffeine pill and the placebo pill on different days. This design is advantageous because it allows each participant to serve as their own control, thereby reducing variability in the experiment. The crossover method leads to improved accuracy in understanding how a single variable—caffeine consumption in this scenario—affects health metrics. This design's strength lies in its ability to isolate the effects of the treatments more effectively than simple parallel-group designs.
Treatments
In experimental terms, treatments refer to the specific conditions applied to experimental units. For the caffeine experiment, the two treatments involved either ingesting a caffeine pill containing 500 milligrams of caffeine or taking a placebo pill. Treatments are central to experimental design as they provide the means by which researchers can test their hypotheses about the explanatory variable. By strictly controlling and documenting treatments, experimenters can make valid inferences about the effects of these conditions on the response variables.
Experimental Units
The experimental units in research are the subjects or entities observed or experimented upon. In the caffeine study, the experimental units are the 47 regular coffee drinkers who took part in the experiment. Each participant's data contributes individually to the results, providing a comprehensive look at how caffeine affects the specified health outcomes. Understanding the role of experimental units helps in structuring an experiment as well as in data collection, ensuring that observations are systematically and consistently documented across all subjects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Unethical experimentation Give an example of a scientific question of interest for which it would be unethical to conduct an experiment. Explain how you could instead conduct an observational study.

Identify the bias A newspaper designs a survey to estimate the proportion of the population willing to invest in the stock market. It takes a list of the 1000 people who have subscribed to the paper the longest and sends each of them a questionnaire that asks, "Given the extremely volatile performance of the stock market as of late, are you willing to invest in stocks to save for retirement?" After analyzing result from the 50 people who reply, they report that only \(10 \%\) of the local citizens are willing to invest in stocks for retirement. Identify the bias that results from the following: a. Sampling bias due to undercoverage b. Sampling bias due to the sampling design c. Nonresponse bias d. Response bias due to the way the question was asked

Multiple choice: Opinion and question wording A recent General Social Survey asked subjects if they supported legalized abortion in each of seven different circumstances. The percentage who supported legalization varied between \(42.4 \%\) (if the woman wants it for any reason) to \(89.2 \%\) (if the woman's health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy). This indicates that a. Responses can depend greatly on the question wording. b. Nonexperimental studies can never be trusted. c. The sample must not have been randomly selected. d. The sample must have had problems with response bias.

Instructor ratings The Web site www.ratemyprofessors .com provides students an opportunity to view ratings for instructors at their universities. A group of students planning to register for a statistics course in the upcoming semester are trying to identify the instructors who receive the highest ratings on the site. One student decides to register for Professor Smith's course because she has the best ratings of all statistics instructors. Another student comments: a. The Web site ratings are unreliable because the ratings are from students who voluntarily visit the site to rate their instructors. b. To obtain reliable information about Professor Smith, they would need to take a simple random sample of the 78 ratings left by students on the site, and compile new overall ratings based on those in the random sample. Which, if either, of the student's comments are valid?

Margin of error Activity 2 in Chapter 1 used the Sample from a Population applet to simulate randomness and variability. We'll use that applet again here, but with a much larger sample size, 1000 . a. For a population proportion of 0.50 for outcome 1, simulate a random sample of size 1000 . What is the sample proportion of outcome \(1 ?\) Do this 10 separate times, keeping track of the 10 sample proportions. b. Find the approximate margin of error for a sample proportion based on 1000 observations. c. Using the margin of error found in part \(\mathrm{b}\) and the 10 sample proportions found in part a, form 10 intervals of believable values for the true proportion. How many of these intervals captured the actual population proportion, \(0.50 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.