/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 104 Multiple choice: Opinion and que... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Multiple choice: Opinion and question wording A recent General Social Survey asked subjects if they supported legalized abortion in each of seven different circumstances. The percentage who supported legalization varied between \(42.4 \%\) (if the woman wants it for any reason) to \(89.2 \%\) (if the woman's health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy). This indicates that a. Responses can depend greatly on the question wording. b. Nonexperimental studies can never be trusted. c. The sample must not have been randomly selected. d. The sample must have had problems with response bias.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Responses can depend greatly on the question wording.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Question

The question asks for an inference based on a survey's finding regarding support for legalized abortion under different circumstances. We need to determine which statement best explains the varying support percentages.
02

Analysis of Option A

Option A suggests that responses can greatly depend on the question wording. This implies that differently posed questions can elicit varying responses, which aligns with the given data since support varied greatly based on the situation provided.
03

Analysis of Option B

Option B states that nonexperimental studies can never be trusted. This is a broad generalization and not directly concluded from the provided data, which simply shows variability in opinion.
04

Analysis of Option C

Option C claims the sample must not have been randomly selected. However, the variability in opinion suggests different perceptions of circumstances rather than issues with sample selection.
05

Analysis of Option D

Option D asserts the sample had response bias problems. While response bias can be an issue, the question specifically highlights variability with different wordings, not necessarily response bias.
06

Conclusion

The most reasonable conclusion from the question and the options provided is that the percentage variation is due to the question's wording and context, which is precisely described in Option A.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Question Wording Effect
The question wording effect is a phenomenon where the way a question is framed can influence the responses of participants in a survey. When asked different versions of a similar question, people may respond differently based on the language used. This implies that even slight changes in wording can lead to significant differences in survey outcomes.

For instance, in the original exercise, respondents showed different levels of support for legalized abortion based on how the question was worded. Question wording can emphasize different ideas or emotional reactions, affecting how the survey-taker perceives the question.
  • It can lead to misunderstandings if the question isn't clear.
  • It might trigger emotional responses if the wording is charged.
  • It influences the participant's thought process and decision-making.
Therefore, survey designers must carefully construct questions to minimize confusion and ensure the answers reflect true opinions.
Nonexperimental Studies
Nonexperimental studies, unlike experiments, do not involve manipulation of variables or control groups. Instead, they observe phenomena as they naturally occur, providing valuable insights into real-world conditions. They're often used in social sciences to study opinions, attitudes, and behaviors.
  • They rely on observation rather than intervention.
  • They're useful for investigating questions where ethical or practical concerns limit experimentation.
However, the challenge with nonexperimental studies lies in establishing causation. These studies can show associations but not necessarily causal relationships. In the context of the original exercise, while a nonexperimental survey design was utilized, it remains a valid approach to gauge public opinion when done correctly.
Random Sampling
Random sampling is a key process in survey methodology to ensure that the results are generalizable to the larger population. It involves selecting participants in a way that each member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen.
  • It helps avoid biases in the selection process.
  • Ensures the sample is representative of the population.
This method is essential in making sure that survey results are not skewed by overrepresentation of a specific group. Although random sampling is effective, the varying percentages in support of legalized abortion from the exercise suggest perception differences according to the scenario presented, rather than sampling errors.
Response Bias
Response bias occurs when respondents answer questions untruthfully or misleadingly. This could happen due to social desirability, where respondents want to present themselves in a favorable light. It could also result from misunderstanding the question or disrespecting survey processes.
  • It may arise from badly worded or confusing questions.
  • It can skew results if participants are more likely to lie than tell the truth.
While response bias can affect survey results, the original exercise emphasized that the observed variation in support for abortion came from the specific wording under different scenarios, not necessarily from response bias. Careful question design and administration can minimize this bias's impact on survey validity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Distinguish helping and hindering among infants, continued Fourteen of the 16 infants in the Yale study elected to play with a toy resembling the helpful figure as opposed to one resembling the hindering figure. Is this convincing evidence that infants tend to prefer the helpful figure? Use the Simulating the Probability of Head with a Fair Coin applet to investigate the approximate likelihood of the observed results of 14 out of 16 infants choosing the helpful figure, if in fact infants are indifferent between the two figures. To perform a simulation, set \(n=1,\) push the flip button 16 times and observe how often you obtain a head out of 16 tosses. Repeat this simulation for a total of 10 simulations. Out of the 10 simulations, how often did you obtain 14 or more heads out of 16 tosses? Are your results convincing evidence that infants actually tend to exhibit a preference?

Video games mindless? "Playing video games not so mindless." This was the headline of a \(C N N\) news report 16 about a study that concluded that young adults who regularly play video games demonstrated better visual skills than young adults who do not play regularly. Sixteen young men volunteered to take a series of tests that measured their visual skills; those who who had played video games in the previous six months performed better on the tests than those who hadn't played. a. What are the explanatory and response variables? b. Was this an observational study or an experiment? Explain. c. Specify a potential lurking variable. Explain your reasoning.

Smoking and death Example 1 in Chapter 3 described a survey of 1314 women during \(1972-1974\), in which each woman was asked whether she was a smoker. Twenty years later, a follow-up survey observed whether each woman was deceased or still alive. Was this study a retrospective study, or a prospective study? Explain.

Multiple choice: Getting a random sample When we use random numbers to take a simple random sample of 50 students from the 20,000 students at a university, a. It is impossible to get the random number 00000 or \(99999,\) since they are not random sequences. b. If we get 20001 for the first random number, for the second random number, that number is less likely to occur than the other possible five-digit random numbers. c. The draw 12345 is no more or less likely than the draw \(11111 .\) d. Since the sample is random, it is impossible that it will be nonrepresentative, such as having only females in the sample.

Poker as a profession? Tony's mother is extremely proud that her son will graduate college in a few months. She expresses concern, however, when Tony tells her that following graduation, he plans to move to Las Vegas to become a professional poker player. He mentions that his friend Nick did so and is now earning more than a million dollars per year. Should Tony's anecdotal evidence about Nick soothe his mother's concern?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.