/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 72 The authors of the paper "The Em... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The authors of the paper "The Empowering (Super) Heroine? The Effects of Sexualized Female Characters in Superhero Films on Women" (Sex Roles [2015]: \(211-220\) ) were interested in the effect on female viewers of watching movies in which female heroines were portrayed in roles that focus on their sex appeal. They carried out an experiment in which female college students were assigned at random to one of two experimental groups. The 23 women in one group watched 13 minutes of scenes from the X-Men film series and then responded to a questionnaire designed to measure body esteem. Lower scores on this measure correspond to lower body satisfaction. The 29 women in the other group (the control group) did not watch any video prior to responding to the questionnaire measuring body esteem. For the women who watched the \(X\) -Men video, the mean body esteem score was 4.43 and the standard deviation was \(1.02 .\) For the women in the control group, the mean body esteem score was 5.08 and the standard deviation was \(0.98 .\) For purposes of this exercise, you may assume that the distribution of body esteem scores for each of the two treatments (video and control) is approximately normal. a. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean body esteem score for the video treatment and the no video treatment. b. Do you think that watching the video has an effect on mean body esteem score? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean body esteem score between the video treatment group and the control group is (-1.173, -0.127). b. Since the 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean body esteem scores between the video and control groups does not contain 0, there is evidence at α = 0.10 level to suggest a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Watching the video appears to have a negative effect on mean body esteem score, as the confidence interval indicates a decrease in the mean body esteem score for those who watched the video compared to those who did not.

Step by step solution

01

Find sample sizes, means, and standard deviations for both groups

Sample size and statistics for both groups are given in the problem: - Video treatment group (Group 1): n1 = 23, mean1 = 4.43, sd1 = 1.02 - Control group (Group 2): n2 = 29, mean2 = 5.08, sd2 = 0.98
02

Calculate the standard error of the difference in means

We will calculate the standard error (SE) of the difference in means using the formula: SE_diff = \(\sqrt{\frac{sd1^2}{n1} + \frac{sd2^2}{n2}}\) SE_diff = \(\sqrt{\frac{1.02^2}{23} + \frac{0.98^2}{29}} = 0.305\)
03

Find the critical value for a 90% confidence interval

As this is a two-tailed test, we will use a 90% confidence interval, which leaves 5% in each tail. Using a t-distribution table or calculator, we look for the critical value corresponding to 0.05 in the upper tail, with degrees of freedom equal to the smallest of n1-1 and n2-1 (since we are working with small samples), so df = min(23-1,29-1) = 22. The critical t-value (t_critical) is 1.717.
04

Calculate the margin of error (ME)

Margin of error (ME) = t_critical × SE_diff ME = 1.717 × 0.305 = 0.523
05

Construct the confidence interval

The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean body esteem scores between the video treatment and the control group is: (Mean_diff - ME, Mean_diff + ME) Mean_diff = mean1 - mean2 = 4.43 - 5.08 = -0.65 The 90% CI: (-0.65 - 0.523, -0.65 + 0.523) = (-1.173, -0.127) a. The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean body esteem score between the video treatment group and the control group is (-1.173, -0.127).
06

Analyze the effect of the video on mean body esteem score

b. Since the 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean body esteem scores between the video and control groups does not contain 0, we have evidence at α = 0.10 level to suggest that there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups. In this case, watching the video appears to have a negative effect on mean body esteem score, as the confidence interval indicates a decrease in the mean body esteem score for those who watched the video compared to those who did not.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sampling Distribution
In the context of statistics, the term sampling distribution refers to the probability distribution of a given statistic based on a random sample. In simpler terms, it is the range of values that a statistic, such as a sample mean, can take if different samples are taken from the same population. In our exercise, the mean body esteem scores from two different groups represent two sampling distributions, one for each group.

Understanding sampling distributions is crucial because they form the basis for various types of statistical inferences, including the construction of confidence intervals. By recognizing that these distributions can vary from sample to sample, we can quantify the uncertainty inherent in our estimates.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error (SE) measures the amount of variability or dispersion in a sampling distribution. Specifically, it represents the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of a statistic, which in our case is the difference in mean body esteem scores between the two groups.

To calculate the standard error of the mean, the formula used incorporates the standard deviations of the individual groups and their respective sample sizes, as seen in the solution step 2. Lower standard error implies that the sample mean is a more precise estimate of the population mean, which is key in assessing the reliability of statistical conclusions.
T-Distribution
The t-distribution is a type of probability distribution that is symmetric and bell-shaped, similar to the normal distribution, but with heavier tails. It arises when estimating the mean of a normally distributed population when the sample size is small and the population standard deviation is unknown.

In our exercise, since we have small sample sizes and we estimate the population parameters, we use the t-distribution to determine the critical value for constructing the confidence interval. As the sample size increases, the t-distribution approaches the normal distribution.
Margin of Error
The margin of error (ME) quantifies the range of error around a sample statistic, such as a sample mean. It tells us how far we can expect the true population parameter to be from our sample estimate. The margin of error includes the critical value from the appropriate distribution and the standard error of the statistic.

In the solution steps 4 and 5, the margin of error was calculated using the critical value from the t-distribution and the standard error of the difference in means. This margin of error was then used to construct the confidence interval, which provides a range in which the true difference in population means is likely to fall.
Statistical Significance
The concept of statistical significance is used to determine whether the observed effect in our sample is unlikely to have occurred due to chance, assuming the null hypothesis is true. By convention, a result is considered statistically significant if the probability of the result occurring by chance is below a pre-determined threshold (the alpha level, \( \alpha \) ).

In the final step of the solution, the confidence interval did not include zero, indicating that there is a statistically significant difference in mean body esteem scores between the two groups at the \( \alpha = 0.10 \) level. This signifies that the observed difference in means is unlikely to be due to random variability alone, suggesting a genuine effect of the video on body esteem.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Supervised Exercise Versus Non-Supervised Exercise for Reducing Weight in Obese Adults" (The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness [2009]: \(85-90\) ) describes an experiment in which participants were randomly assigned either to a supervised exercise program or a control group. Those in the control group were told that they should take measures to lose weight. Those in the supervised exercise group were told they should take measures to lose weight, but they also participated in regular supervised exercise sessions. Weight loss at the end of four months was recorded. Data consistent with summary quantities given in the paper are shown in the accompanying table.Use the given information to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean weight loss for the two treatments.

The paper "The Effect of Multitasking on the Grade Performance of Business Students" (Research in Higher Education Journal [2010]: 1-10) describes an experiment in which 62 undergraduate business students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. Students in one group were asked to listen to a lecture but were told that they were permitted to use cell phones to send text messages during the lecture. Students in the second group listened to the same lecture but were not permitted to send text messages. Afterwards, students in both groups took a quiz on material covered in the lecture. Data from this experiment are summarized in the accompanying table.

Do children diagnosed with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have smaller brains than children without this condition? This question was the topic of a research study described in the paper "Developmental Trajectories of Brain Volume Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder" (Journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: \(1740-1747\) ). Brain scans were completed for a representative sample of 152 children with ADHI) and a representative sample of 139 children without \(A D H D\). Summary values for total cerebral volume (in cubic milliliters) are given in the following table: Is there convincing evidence that the mean brain volume for children with ADHD is smuller than the mean for children without ADHD? Test the relevant hypotheses using a 0.05 level of significance.

Many runners believe that listening to music while running enhances their performance. The authors of the paper "Effects of Synchronous Music on Treadmill Running Among Elite Triathletes" (Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport \([2012]: 52-57)\) wondered if this is true for experienced runners. They recorded time to exhaustion for 11 triathletes while running on a treadmill at a speed determined to be near their peak running velocity. The time to exhaustion was recorded for each participant on two different days. On one day, each participant ran while listening to music that the runner selected as motivational. On a different day, each participant ran with no music playing. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard these 11 triathletes as representative of the population of experienced triathletes. Only summary quantities were given in the paper, but the data in the table on the next page are consistent with the means and standard deviations given in the paper. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean time to exhaustion for experienced triathletes is greater when they run while listening to motivational music? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\).

Herc's one to sink your teeth into: The authors of the article "Analysis of Food Crushing Sounds During Mastication: Total Sound Level Studies" (Journal of Texture Studies [1990]: \(165-178\) ) studicd the nature of sounds generated during eating. Peak loudness was measured (in decibels at \(20 \mathrm{~cm}\) away \()\) for both open-mouth and closedmouth chewing of potato chips and of tortilla chips. A sample of size 10 was used for each of the four possible combinations (such as closed-mouth potato chip, and so on). We are not making this up! Summary values taken from plots given in the article appear in the accompanying table. For purposes of this exercise, suppose that it is reasonable to regard the peak loudness distributions as approximately normal. a. Construct a 95\% confidence interval for the difference in mean peak loudness between open-mouth and closedmouth chewing of potato chips. Be sure to interpret the resulting interval. b. For closed-mouth chewing (the recommended method!), construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean peak loudness between potato chips and tortilla chips.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.