/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 71 The paper "Does the Color of the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "Does the Color of the Mug Influence the Taste of the Coffee?" (Flavour [2014]: 1-7) describes an experiment in which subjects were assigned at random to one of two treatment groups. The 12 people in one group were scrved coffee in a white mug and were asked to rate the quality of the coffee on a scale from 0 to 100 . The 12 people in the second group were served the same coffee in a clear glass mug, and they also rated the coffee. The mean quality rating for the 12 people in the white mug group was 50.35 and the standard deviation was \(20.17 .\) The mean quality rating for the 12 people in the clear glass mug group was 61.48 and the standard deviation was \(16.69 .\) For purposes of this exercise, you may assume that the distribution of quality ratings for each of the two treatments is approximately normal. a. Use the given information to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean quality rating for this coffee when served in a white mug and when served in a glass mug. b. Based on the interval from Part (a), are you convinced that the color of the mug makes a difference in terms of mean quality rating? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean quality ratings between the white and glass mugs is (-22.336, 0.924). Since this interval contains zero, we cannot conclude with 95% confidence that the color of the mug affects the mean quality rating of the coffee. Therefore, we do not have strong evidence to suggest that the color of the mug makes a significant difference in terms of mean quality rating.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the formulas

In this step, we will identify the formulas needed to calculate the confidence interval. 1. Standard Error (SE) of the difference = \(\sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_{2}^2}{n_2}}\) 2. Margin of Error (ME) = critical value * Standard Error 3. Confidence Interval = (Difference in Means - Margin of Error, Difference in Means + Margin of Error) Here, \(s_{1}\) represents the standard deviation of white mug group, \(s_{2}\) represents the standard deviation of glass mug group, \(n_1\) represents the sample size of white mug group (12), and \(n_2\) represents the sample size of the glass mug group (12)
02

Calculate the Standard Error

Use the standard error formula to calculate the standard error of the difference in mean quality ratings. SE = \(\sqrt{\frac{20.17^2}{12} + \frac{16.69^2}{12}}=5.717\)
03

Calculate the Margin of Error

For a 95% confidence interval, the critical value is approximately 1.96. Calculate the margin of error using the critical value and the standard error. ME = 1.96 * 5.717 = 11.206
04

Calculate the Confidence Interval

Now, calculate the confidence interval using the difference in means and the margin of error. Confidence Interval = (50.35 - 61.48 - 11.206, 50.35 - 61.48 + 11.206) = (-22.336, 0.924) #b. Concluding if the color of the mug makes a difference#
05

Interpret the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval we constructed is (-22.336, 0.924). Since it includes zero, we cannot conclude with 95% confidence that the mug's color affects the mean quality rating of the coffee. This means we do not have strong evidence to suggest that the color of the mug makes a significant difference in terms of mean quality rating.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Design
Experiments like the one described in the exercise aim to uncover relationships between different variables by observing outcomes under controlled conditions. In this specific experiment, researchers wanted to find out if the color of a mug could influence the perception of coffee taste.

Key features of experimental design include:
  • Random Assignment: Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups to ensure any differences in results are due to the color of the mug and not other factors.
  • Controlled Variables: All other variables such as the type of coffee and environment were kept constant, to focus solely on the impact of the mug's color.
  • Sample Size: Each group consisted of 12 people, making it 24 in total, which is a small sample size but allows preliminary insights.
These elements help ensure the reliability and validity of the experiment's findings.
Standard Error
Standard Error (SE) measures how much difference exists between a sample statistic and the actual population parameter. It's pivotal in understanding the precision of sample data when estimating population metrics. SE is crucial in this experiment because it shows the accuracy of the mean quality ratings.To calculate SE for the difference between two groups, the formula is:\[SE = \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]- Here, \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are the standard deviations of each group, and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes.A smaller SE indicates that the sample mean is a more reliable estimate of the true population mean. In this case, the calculated SE is \(5.717\). This means there's a moderate level of variability in how accurately the sample represents the overall population.
Mean Quality Rating
The mean quality rating provides a numerical average that reflects the general perception of the coffee's quality among participants. In this study, the mean rating differs between the two groups, with the white mug group having a mean of 50.35, and the glass mug group a mean of 61.48.
Understanding this concept involves:
  • Mean Calculation: The mean is calculated by summing all individual ratings in a group and dividing by the number of participants (12 in each group).
  • Implication of Means: At first glance, it might seem that coffee in a glass mug is perceived as better, due to a higher mean rating.
However, mean alone doesn’t indicate if the difference is statistically significant. That's where further statistical methods, like confidence intervals, come into play.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance indicates whether a result is likely due to a specific factor rather than random chance. In this study, the researchers use a confidence interval to support conclusions about statistical significance between coffee mug colors and taste perceptions. Here's how this works:
  • Confidence Interval: The interval calculated is (-22.336, 0.924). Since this includes zero, it suggests that the observed difference in means might be due to random variability rather than an actual effect of mug color.
  • Significance Level: Typically set at 0.05 for a 95% confidence interval, indicating that a result would be considered significant if the confidence interval did not include zero.
Ultimately, the findings imply that, based on the study's data and design, there isn't enough evidence at the 95% confidence level to confirm that mug color significantly influences coffee taste perception.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "The Effect of Multitasking on the Grade Performance of Business Students" (Research in Higher Education Journal [2010]: 1-10) describes an experiment in which 62 undergraduate business students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. Students in one group were asked to listen to a lecture but were told that they were permitted to use cell phones to send text messages during the lecture. Students in the second group listened to the same lecture but were not permitted to send text messages. Afterwards, students in both groups took a quiz on material covered in the lecture. Data from this experiment are summarized in the accompanying table.

The paper "The Effect of Multitasking on the Grade Performance of Business Students" (Research in Higher Education Journal [2010]: 1-10) describes an experiment in which 62 undergraduate business students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. Students in one group were asked to listen to a lecture but were told that they were permitted to use cell phones to send text messages during the lecture. Students in the second group listened to the same lecture but were not permitted to send text messages during the lecture. Afterwards, students in both groups took a quiz on material covered in the lecture. The researchers reported that the mean quiz score for students in the texting group was significantly lower than the mean quiz score for students in the no-texting group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the texting group mean was significantly lower than the no-text group mean. (Hint: See discussion on page \(662 .\) )

Many people now turn to the Internet to get information on health-related topics. The paper "An Examination of Health, Medical and Nutritional Information on the Internet: A Comparative study of Wikipedia, WebMD and the Mayo Clinic Websites" (The International Journal of Communication and Health [2015]: 30-38) used Flesch reading ease scores (a measure of reading difficulty based on factors such as sentence length and number of syllables in the words used) to score pages on Wikipedia and on WebMD. Higher Flesch scores correspond to more difficult reading levels. The paper reported that for a representative sample of health-related pages on Wikipedia, the mean Flesch score was 26.7 and the standard deviation of the Flesch scores was \(14.1 .\) For a representative sample of pages from WebMD, the mean score was 43.9 and the standard deviation was 19.4 . Suppose that these means and standard deviations were based on samples of 40 pages from each site. Is there convincing evidence that the mean reading level for health-related pages differs for Wikipedia and WebMD? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\)

Research has shown that, for baseball players, good hip range of motion results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (The American journal of Sports Medicine, \(2010: 383-388\) ) reported on a study of independent samples of 40 professionul pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the pitchers, the sample mean hip range of motion was 75.6 degrees and the sample standard deviation was 5.9 degrees, whercas the sample mean and sample standard deviation for position players were 79.6 degrees and 7.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming that the two samples are representative of professional bascball pitchers and position players, test hypotheses appropriate for determining if there is convincing evidence that the mean range of motion for pitchers is less than the mean for position players.

Many runners believe that listening to music while running enhances their performance. The authors of the paper "Effects of Synchronous Music on Treadmill Running Among Elite Triathletes" (Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport \([2012]: 52-57)\) wondered if this is true for experienced runners. They recorded time to exhaustion for 11 triathletes while running on a treadmill at a speed determined to be near their peak running velocity. The time to exhaustion was recorded for each participant on two different days. On one day, each participant ran while listening to music that the runner selected as motivational. On a different day, each participant ran with no music playing. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard these 11 triathletes as representative of the population of experienced triathletes. Only summary quantities were given in the paper, but the data in the table on the next page are consistent with the means and standard deviations given in the paper. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean time to exhaustion for experienced triathletes is greater when they run while listening to motivational music? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.