/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 103 In the paper "Happiness for Sale... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In the paper "Happiness for Sale: Do Experiential Purchases Make Consumers Happier than Material Purchases?" (Journal of Consumer Research [2009]: \(188-197\) ), the authors distinguish between spending money on experiences (such as travel) and spending money on material possessions (such as a car). In an experiment to determine if the type of purchase affects how happy people are after the purchase has been made, 185 college students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The students in the "experiential" group were asked to recall a time when they spent about \(\$ 300\) on an experience. They rated this purchase on three different happiness scales that were then combined into an overall measure of happiness. The students assigned to the "material" group recalled a time that they spent about \(\$ 300\) on an object and rated this purchase in the same manner. The mean happiness score was 5.75 for the experiential group and 5.27 for the material group. Standard deviations and sample sizes were not given in the paper, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that they were as follows:

Short Answer

Expert verified
Using a two-sample t-test, we compared the happiness scores between the experiential group with a mean of 5.75 and the material group with a mean of 5.27. We assumed standard deviations of 0.7 and 0.8, and sample sizes of 110 and 75 for the experiential and material groups, respectively. After calculating the t-statistic and finding the corresponding p-value, we can draw a conclusion based on a significance level of 0.05: - If the p-value < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is a significant difference in happiness scores between experiential and material groups. - If the p-value >= 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is no significant difference in happiness scores between the groups.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the data for both groups

We need to have the necessary data to perform the t-test: - Experiential group: Mean happiness score = 5.75 - Material group: Mean happiness score = 5.27 - Standard deviations and sample sizes are not given, so we need to assume values for them.
02

Assume or calculate the standard deviations and sample sizes

Based on the given exercise information, we will assume the following standard deviations and sample sizes for each group: - Experiential group: Standard deviation (s1) = 0.7, Sample size (n1) = 110 - Material group: Standard deviation (s2) = 0.8, Sample size (n2) = 75
03

Set up the null hypothesis

In order to conduct a two-sample t-test, we have to set up the null hypothesis, H0, which states that there's no difference between the mean happiness scores of the two groups. H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0
04

Calculate the pooled standard deviation

To perform the two-sample t-test, we need to calculate the pooled standard deviation (sp): \( sp = \sqrt{\frac{(n1-1)s1^2 + (n2-1)s2^2}{n1 + n2 - 2}} \) \( sp = \sqrt{\frac{(110-1)(0.7)^2 + (75-1)(0.8)^2}{110 + 75 - 2}} \)
05

Calculate the t-statistic

With the pooled standard deviation calculated, we can now compute the t-statistic (t): \( t = \frac{(\bar{x1} - \bar{x2}) - (μ1 - μ2)}{sp \sqrt{\frac{1}{n1} + \frac{1}{n2}}} \) \( t = \frac{(5.75 - 5.27) - 0}{sp \sqrt{\frac{1}{110} + \frac{1}{75}}} \)
06

Determine the degrees of freedom

In order to find the p-value, we first need to determine the degrees of freedom (df) for the t-distribution: df = n1 + n2 - 2
07

Find the p-value

Using a t-table or calculator, we locate the p-value corresponding to the t-statistic and degrees of freedom. If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level (typically 0.05), we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the happiness scores between the groups. If the p-value is greater than or equal to the significance level, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no significant difference in the happiness scores between the groups.
08

Draw a conclusion based on the p-value

Based on the p-value, we will draw a conclusion: - If p-value < 0.05, reject H0 and conclude that there is a significant difference in happiness scores between experiential and material groups. - If p-value >= 0.05, fail to reject H0 and conclude that there is no significant difference in happiness scores between the groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental technique in statistics that allows us to make decisions or draw conclusions about a population based on sample data. In the case of comparing happiness scores from experiential and material purchases, hypothesis testing helps us determine whether observed differences in scores are likely due to true differences in the populations or are just a result of random variation.

To perform hypothesis testing, we start by formulating two hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis (H0): This hypothesis states that there is no difference between the two groups. For our exercise, it's written as \( H0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \), where \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) are the mean happiness scores of the experiential and material groups, respectively.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (H1): This suggests that there is a difference. Here, it would be \( H1: \mu_1 - \mu_2 eq 0 \).
We then use statistical calculations to test these hypotheses, guided by a significance level, typically set at 0.05. If our test results exceed this threshold, we reject the null hypothesis and accept that there is evidence of a difference in happiness scores.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) is a crucial concept in statistics, reflecting the number of values in our final calculation that are free to vary. When performing a t-test to compare means, knowing the degrees of freedom helps accurately determine the distribution of the test statistic and find the appropriate p-value.

For a two-sample t-test like the one in our happiness score comparison, the degrees of freedom can be calculated using the formula:
\[ df = n_1 + n_2 - 2 \]
where:
  • \( n_1 \) is the sample size of the experiential group
  • \( n_2 \) is the sample size of the material group
This formula arises because we estimate two sample means while considering the pooled standard deviation. Thus, for our exercise with sample sizes of 110 and 75, the degrees of freedom would be \( 110 + 75 - 2 = 183 \). Knowing the degrees of freedom allows us to use the correct t-distribution to calculate the p-value, which informs our final conclusion.
Pooled Standard Deviation
The pooled standard deviation is an essential step in conducting a two-sample t-test as it gives a combined measure of variability for two independent samples. This approach is used when we assume that the variances of the two populations are equal, which allows a more precise estimate of the standard deviation.

The formula used to calculate the pooled standard deviation is:
\[ sp = \sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^2 + (n_2-1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}} \]
where:
  • \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes
  • \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) are the standard deviations of the experiential and material groups, respectively
In our exercise, assuming standard deviations of 0.7 and 0.8 with sample sizes of 110 and 75, the pooled standard deviation helps us normalize the variance effect across both samples, ensuring a fair comparison of mean differences.
Happiness Score Comparison
The happiness score comparison seeks to understand if spending money on experiences results in greater happiness than spending on material goods. By comparing mean happiness scores from two groups, we aim to determine whether the type of purchase significantly affects the levels of happiness.

Using the assumed data:
  • Experiential group mean = 5.75
  • Material group mean = 5.27
we set out to test these scores using a two-sample t-test. The goal is to see if the difference is statistically significant.
  • If our p-value is less than the significance level (usually 0.05), it suggests that the difference in happiness is genuine, not due to random chance.
  • If the p-value is large, we cannot confidently say there is such a difference.
This statistical assessment helps inform whether policies or personal choices prioritizing experiences over material purchases might foster greater happiness.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What impact does fast-food consumption have on various dietary and health characteristics? The article "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality among Children in a National Household Study" (Pediatrics, 2004: \(112-118\) ) reported the accompanying summary statistics on daily calorie intake for a representative sample of teens who do not typically eat fast food and a representative sample of teens who do eat fast food. Is there convincing evidence that the mean calorie intake for teens who typically eat fast food is greater than the mean intake for those who don't by more than 200 calories per day?

The article "An Alternative Vote: Applying Science to the Teaching of Science" (The Economist, May 12,2011 ) describes an experiment conducted at the University of British Columbia. A total of 850 engineering students enrolled in a physics course participated in the experiment. Students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. Both groups attended the same lectures for the first 11 weeks of the semester. In the twelfth week, one of the groups was switched to a style of teaching where students were expected to do reading assignments prior to class, and then class time was used to focus on problem solving, discussion, and group work. The second group continued with the traditional lecture approach. At the end of the twelfth week, students were given a test over the course material from that week. The mean test score for students in the new teaching method group was 74 , and the mean test score for students in the traditional lecture group was 41 . Suppose that the two groups each consisted of 425 students. Also suppose that the standard deviations of test scores for the new teaching method group and the traditional lecture method group were 20 and \(24,\) respectively. Estimate the difference in mean test score for the two teaching methods using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Be sure to give an interpretation of the interval.

Many runners believe that listening to music while running enhances their performance. The authors of the paper "Effects of Synchronous Music on Treadmill Running Among Elite Triathletes" (Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport \([2012]: 52-57)\) wondered if this is true for experienced runners. They recorded time to exhaustion for 11 triathletes while running on a treadmill at a speed determined to be near their peak running velocity. The time to exhaustion was recorded for each participant on two different days. On one day, each participant ran while listening to music that the runner selected as motivational. On a different day, each participant ran with no music playing. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard these 11 triathletes as representative of the population of experienced triathletes. Only summary quantities were given in the paper, but the data in the table on the next page are consistent with the means and standard deviations given in the paper. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean time to exhaustion for experienced triathletes is greater when they run while listening to motivational music? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\).

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: 1322-1326) gave the accompanying data on total body bone mineral content (in grams) for a representative sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the post-weaning period (P). Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the difference in mean total body bone mineral content during post- weaning and during breast feeding.

The paper "Supervised Exercise Versus Non-Supervised Exercise for Reducing Weight in Obese Adults" (The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness [2009]: \(85-90\) ) describes an experiment in which participants were randomly assigned either to a supervised exercise program or a control group. Those in the control group were told only that they should take measures to lose weight. Those in the supervised exercise group were told they should take measures to lose weight as well, but they also participated in regular supervised exercise sessions. The researchers reported that after 4 months, the mean decrease in body fat was significantly higher for the supervised exercise group than for the control group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the exercise group mean was significantly higher than the control group mean.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.