/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 Breast feeding sometimes results... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: 1322-1326) gave the accompanying data on total body bone mineral content (in grams) for a representative sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the post-weaning period (P). Use a \(95 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the difference in mean total body bone mineral content during post- weaning and during breast feeding.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean total body bone mineral content during post-weaning and during breastfeeding can be calculated using the following steps: 1. Calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation for both breastfeeding and post-weaning data. 2. Compute the difference in sample means (\(\bar{X}_{D} = \bar{X}_{P} - \bar{X}_{B}\)). 3. Estimate the standard error of the difference: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{s_{B}^2}{n_{B}} + \frac{s_{P}^2}{n_{P}}}\). 4. Compute the margin of error using a 95% confidence interval: \(ME = t^* \times SE\). 5. Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means: Lower limit = \(\bar{X}_{D} - ME\), Upper limit = \(\bar{X}_{D} + ME\). This interval estimates the difference in mean total body bone mineral content during post-weaning and during breastfeeding with 95% confidence.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation of both breastfeeding and post-weaning data

Let's denote the breastfeeding data as sample B and the post-weaning data as sample P. First, calculate the sample mean (\(\bar{X}_{B}\) and \(\bar{X}_{P}\)) and sample standard deviation (s_B and s_P) for both samples.
02

Compute the difference in sample means

Now, calculate the difference in sample means by subtracting the breastfeeding mean (\(\bar{X}_{B}\)) from the post-weaning mean (\(\bar{X}_{P}\)): \(\bar{X}_{D} = \bar{X}_{P} - \bar{X}_{B}\)
03

Estimate the standard error of the difference

We need to estimate the standard error of the difference. Assuming that the two samples are independent, we can calculate the standard error (SE) of the difference in means as: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{s_{B}^2}{n_{B}} + \frac{s_{P}^2}{n_{P}}}\) where \(n_{B}\) and \(n_{P}\) are the sample sizes of breastfeeding and post-weaning data, respectively.
04

Compute the margin of error using a 95% confidence interval

The margin of error (ME) can be calculated using the t-distribution critical value (t*) and standard error (SE) as follows: \(ME = t^* \times SE\) Since we want a 95% confidence interval, and we know the degrees of freedom (which should be the smaller of \(n_{B}-1\) and \(n_{P}-1\)), we can find the t-distribution critical value (t*) from a two-tailed t-distribution table.
05

Calculate the confidence interval for the difference in means

Finally, we can calculate the 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean total body bone mineral content during post-weaning and during breastfeeding: Lower limit of the confidence interval = \(\bar{X}_{D} - ME\) Upper limit of the confidence interval = \(\bar{X}_{D} + ME\) This interval provides an estimate of the difference in mean total body bone mineral content during post-weaning and during breastfeeding with 95% confidence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Mean
The sample mean, often denoted as \( \bar{X} \) for a given sample, is a fundamental statistical calculation representing the average value of a set of numbers. It is computed by adding together all the values in a sample (in this case, the total body bone mineral content of mothers during breastfeeding and post-weaning periods) and dividing by the number of observations in the sample.

For educational clarity, consider if a classroom of students took a test. The sample mean of their scores would be found by adding up all the individual scores and dividing by the total number of students. In the context of our exercise, this concept is used to assess the central tendency in bone mineral content among the sample of mothers at different stages: breastfeeding and post-weaning.
Sample Standard Deviation
The sample standard deviation is a measurement of the amount of variation or dispersion in a set of values. A low standard deviation indicates that the values are close to the mean, while a high standard deviation indicates a wider dispersion around the mean. To calculate this, we subtract the sample mean from each observation, square these differences, add them up, divide by the sample size minus one, and finally take the square root of that result.

An easily relatable example could be measuring the height variation in a group of plants grown under similar conditions. The sample standard deviation would give us insight into how much the plant heights vary from the average plant height. Applying this to our mother's bone mineral content, it helps us understand how much individual measurements deviate from the average bone mineral content in each group.
Standard Error
The standard error of the mean (SEM) is a statistical term that measures how far the sample mean of the data is likely to be from the true population mean. It's calculated by dividing the sample standard deviation by the square root of the sample size. The smaller the standard error, the more representative the sample mean is likely to be of the overall population.

Imagine throwing a dart at a target several times. Your aim (the sample mean) might improve with practice, but there's always some variation in where the darts land. The standard error helps us understand how much this variation affects our estimation of the true center of the target. In the exercise context, calculating the standard error gives us an understanding of the precision of our estimate for the difference in bone mineral content between the two states.
T-distribution
The t-distribution is a type of probability distribution that is symmetric and bell-shaped, like the standard normal distribution, but has heavier tails, meaning it accounts for more variability. It's especially useful when dealing with small sample sizes or when the population standard deviation is unknown.

Let's say you're tasting different batches of a chef's soup to determine which has the best flavor. However, you only have a few samples to taste from each batch. The t-distribution would give you a more accurate assessment of the likely flavor (the true mean) across all batches, considering there are fewer taste tests (samples) for evaluation. When we are working with the sample data of bone mineral content in mothers, the t-distribution helps us understand the probabilities of different means we can expect to find and thereby helps to calculate the margin of error and confidence interval for the actual mean difference between breastfeeding and post-weaning bone mineral content.
Bone Mineral Content
Bone mineral content (BMC) is a measure of the amount of minerals, such as calcium, contained in bone tissue, which gives bones their strength and rigidity. BMC can vary due to several factors including dietary intake, physical activity, and physiological conditions like pregnancy and lactation.

As an analogy, imagine the bones as the framework of a building. Just like the building's strength depends on the quality of materials used, bone strength relies on its mineral content. In our exercise, researchers are interested in the fluctuation of BMC in adolescent mothers during and after breastfeeding, a period when their bodies might have different mineral demands. Understanding the change in BMC can provide insights into the health implications of breastfeeding on bone density.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Effects of Caffeine on Repeated Sprint Ability, Reactive Agility Time, Sleep and Next Day Performance" (Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness [2010]: \(455-464)\) describes an experiment in which male athlete volunteers who were considered low caffeine consumers were assigned at random to one of two cxpcrimental groups. Those assigned to the caffeine group drank a beverage which contained caffeine one hour before an excrcise session. Those in the no-caffeine group drank a beverage that did not contain caffeine. During the exercise session, each participant performed a test that measured reactive agility. The researchers reported that there was \(n 0\) significant difference in mean reactive agility for the two experimental groups. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that there is no significant difference in the group means.

For each of the following hypothesis testing scenarios, indicate whether or not the appropriate hypothesis test would be for a difference in population means. If not, explain why not.

The paper "Does the Color of the Mug Influence the Taste of the Coffee?" (Flavour [2014]: 1-7) describes an experiment in which subjects were assigned at random to one of two treatment groups. The 12 people in one group were scrved coffee in a white mug and were asked to rate the quality of the coffee on a scale from 0 to 100 . The 12 people in the second group were served the same coffee in a clear glass mug, and they also rated the coffee. The mean quality rating for the 12 people in the white mug group was 50.35 and the standard deviation was \(20.17 .\) The mean quality rating for the 12 people in the clear glass mug group was 61.48 and the standard deviation was \(16.69 .\) For purposes of this exercise, you may assume that the distribution of quality ratings for each of the two treatments is approximately normal. a. Use the given information to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean quality rating for this coffee when served in a white mug and when served in a glass mug. b. Based on the interval from Part (a), are you convinced that the color of the mug makes a difference in terms of mean quality rating? Explain.

Research has shown that for baseball players, good hip range of motion results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (The American Journal of Sports Medicine, \(2010: 383-388\) ) reported on a study involving independent samples of 40 professional pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the sample of pitchers, the mean hip range of motion was 75.6 degrees and the standard deviation was 5.9 degrees, whereas the mean and standard deviation for the sample of position players were 79.6 degrees and 7.6 degrees, respectively, Assuming that these two samples are representative of professional baseball pitchers and position players, estimate the difference in mean hip range of motion for pitchers and position players using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval.

The article "An Alternative Vote: Applying Science to the Teaching of Science" (The Economist, May 12,2011 ) describes an experiment conducted at the University of British Columbia. A total of 850 engineering students enrolled in a physics course participated in the experiment. These students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. The two groups attended the same lectures for the first 11 weeks of the semester. In the twelfth week, one of the groups was switched to a style of teaching where students were expected to do reading assignments prior to class and then class time was used to focus on problem solving, discussion and group work. The second group continued with the traditional lecture approach. At the end of the twelfth week, the students were given a test over the course material from that week. The mean test score for students in the new teaching method group was 74 and the mean test score for students in the traditional lecture group was 41 . Suppose that the two groups each consisted of 425 students and that the standard deviations of test scores for the new teaching method group and the traditional lecture method group were 20 and 24 , respectively. Can you conclude that the mean test score is significantly higher for the new teaching method group than for the traditional lecture method group? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.