/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Gallup surveyed adult Americans ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Gallup surveyed adult Americans about their consumer debt ("Americans' Big Debt Burden Growing, Not Evenly Distributed," February 4, 2016, www.gallup.com, retrieved December 15,2016 ). They reported that \(47 \%\) of millennials (those born between 1980 and 1996 ) and \(61 \%\) of Gen Xers (those born between 1965 and 1971 ) did not pay off their credit cards each month and therefore carried a balance from month to month. Suppose that these percentages were based on representative samples of 450 millennials and 300 Gen Xers. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of Gen Xers who do not pay off their credit cards each month is greater than this proportion for millennials? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is convincing evidence at a 0.05 significance level that the proportion of Gen Xers who do not pay off their credit cards each month is greater than this proportion for millennials.

Step by step solution

01

State the hypotheses.

The null hypothesis (H鈧) states that there's no difference between the two proportions, and the alternative hypothesis (H鈧) states that the proportion of Gen Xers who don't pay off their credit cards each month is greater than the proportion for millennials. \(H_0: p_2 - p_1 = 0\) \(H_1: p_2 - p_1 > 0\) Where \(p_1\) is the proportion of millennials who don't pay off their credit cards each month and \(p_2\) is the proportion of Gen Xers who don't pay off their credit cards each month.
02

Calculate the pooled proportion.

We need to find the pooled proportion since we're comparing two proportions. The pooled proportion (\(p\)) is calculated as follows: \(p = \frac{n_1 p_1 + n_2 p_2}{n_1 + n_2}\) Where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the respective sample sizes for millennials and Gen Xers. Using the given data, we have: \(p = \frac{450 \times 0.47 + 300 \times 0.61}{450 + 300} = \frac{211.5 + 183}{750} \approx 0.527\)
03

Calculate the test statistic.

The test statistic is calculated using the following formula: \(z = \frac{(p_2 - p_1) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n_1} + \frac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}}\) Using the calculated pooled proportion and the sample data, we have: \(z = \frac{(0.61 - 0.47) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{0.527(1-0.527)}{450} + \frac{0.527(1-0.527)}{300}}} \approx 4.62\)
04

Find the p-value.

Since this is a right-tailed test (H鈧 states the proportion for Gen Xers is greater than that for millennials), the p-value is the probability of finding a value more extreme than the calculated test statistic, to the right. Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find the p-value to be: \(p \approx 0.000019\)
05

Compare p-value to the significance level and make a decision.

Our p-value is much smaller than the given significance level of 0.05: \(0.000019 < 0.05\) Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis.
06

Conclusion:

There is convincing evidence at 0.05 significance level that the proportion of Gen Xers who do not pay off their credit cards each month is greater than this proportion for millennials.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Comparison
In statistics, comparing proportions helps us understand how different groups behave or have different characteristics. For instance, in the example with millennials and Gen Xers, we are interested in whether there is a significant difference in their credit card payment habits. Proportion comparison essentially answers whether two groups are meaningfully different or if the observed difference could just be due to chance. We achieve this by comparing the proportions, which in this case are the percentages of each group that do not pay off credit cards monthly:- 47% for millennials- 61% for Gen XersWe want to determine if the difference in these percentages (\((p_2 - p_1)\)) is significant enough to infer that one group behaves differently than the other.
Significance Level
The significance level in hypothesis testing is a threshold we set to decide when to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.In our example, the significance level is set at 0.05. This means we are accepting a 5% risk of incorrectly deciding that Gen Xers have a higher proportion of not paying off their credit card balance compared to millennials when there actually is no real difference.The significance level \((\alpha = 0.05)\) serves as a guideline:- If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis.- If the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Pooled Proportion
When performing hypothesis tests involving proportions, particularly when comparing two proportions, we often need to calculate a pooled proportion. The pooled proportion combines the information from both sample groups into a single metric to provide a more accurate assessment of the combined background proportion. Using the formula:\[ p = \frac{n_1 \cdot p_1 + n_2 \cdot p_2}{n_1 + n_2} \]we blend the sample proportions: - Gallup's survey: 450 millennials (\((n_1)\)) and 300 Gen Xers (\((n_2)\))- Their reported proportions are 47% and 61%, respectively.The calculation yields a pooled proportion of \(0.527\), balancing the input from both populations based on their sample sizes and individual proportions. This combined measure is essential for calculating the test statistic in the subsequent step.
Test Statistic
The test statistic helps us determine how far the observed data deviated from the null hypothesis. It converts the difference in our sampled proportions into a standardized form so that we can compare it against a theoretical distribution.In our example, the test statistic \(z\) is computed by:\[ z = \frac{(p_2 - p_1) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n_1} + \frac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}} \]- This formula takes into account the difference between the two sample proportions and standardizes it using the pooled proportion.- The calculated value \(z \approx 4.62\) suggests a significant deviation from the null hypothesis, favoring the alternative hypothesis.To interpret the test statistic, we compare it to a critical value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to our significance level. Here, because our critical p-value is \(0.000019\) (well below our \(0.05\) threshold), we reject the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant difference between the groups.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The report "The New Food Fights: U.S. Public Divides Over Food Science" (December 1, 2016, www.pewinternet.org, retrieved December 10,2016 ) states that younger adults are more likely to see foods with genetically modified ingredients as being bad for their health than older adults. This statement is based on a representative sample of 178 adult Americans age 18 to 29 and a representative sample of 427 adult Americans age 50 to 64 . Of those in the 18 to 29 age group, \(48 \%\) said they believed these foods were bad for their health, while only \(38 \%\) of those in the 50 to 64 age group believed this. a. Are the sample sizes large enough to use the large-sample confidence interval to estimate the difference in the population proportions? Explain. b. Estimate the difference in the proportion of adult Americans age 18 to 29 who believe the foods made with genetically modified ingredients are bad for their health and the corresponding proportion for adult Americans age 50 to \(64 .\) Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. c. Is zero in the confidence interval? What does this suggest about the difference in the two population proportions?

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA TODAY, February 2,2010 ) describes a study in which 81 patients age 13 to 25 who were considered at risk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. Those in the other group took a placebo. After 1 year, \(5 \%\) of those in the fish oil group and \(28 \%\) of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the largesample \(z\) test to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

Choice blindness is the term that psychologists use to describe a situation in which a person expresses a preference and then doesn't notice when they receive something different than what they asked for. The authors of the paper "Can Chocolate Cure Blindness? Investigating the Effect of Preference Strength and Incentives on the Incidence of Choice Blindness" Uournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics [2016]: 1-11) wondered if choice blindness would occur more often if people made their initial selection by looking at pictures of different kinds of chocolate compared with if they made their initial selection by looking as the actual different chocolate candies. Suppose that 200 people were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The 100 people in the first group are shown a picture of eight different kinds of chocolate candy and asked which one they would like to have. After they selected, the picture is removed and they are given a chocolate candy, but not the one they actually selected. The 100 people in the second group are shown a tray with the eight different kinds of candy and asked which one they would like to receive. Then the tray is removed and they are given a chocolate candy, but not the one they selected. If 20 of the people in the picture group and 12 of the people in the actual candy group failed to detect the switch, would you conclude that there is convincing evidence that the proportion who experience choice blindness is different for the two treatments (choice based on a picture and choice based on seeing the actual candy)? Test the relevant hypotheses using a 0.01 significance level.

The Interactive Advertising Bureau surveyed a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans and a representative sample of 1000 adults in China (鈥淢ajority of Digital Users in U.S. and China Regularly Shop and Purchase via E-Commerce," November \(10,2016,\) www.iab.com, retrieved December 15,2016 ). They reported that American shoppers are much more likely to use a credit or a debit card to make an online purchase. This conclusion was based on finding that \(63 \%\) of the people in the United States sample said they pay with a credit or a debit card, while only \(34 \%\) of those in the China sample said that they used a credit card or a debit card to pay for online purchases. To determine if the stated conclusion is justified, you want to carry out a test of hypotheses to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion who pay with a credit card or a debit card is greater for adult Americans than it is for adult Chinese. a. What hypotheses should be tested to answer the question of interest? b. Are the two samples large enough for the large-sample test for a difference in population proportions to be appropriate? Explain. c. Based on the following Minitab output, what is the value of the test statistic and what is the value of the associated \(P\) -value? If a significance level of 0.01 is selected for the test, will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? d. Interpret the result of the hypothesis test in the context of this problem.

The article "More Teen Drivers See Marijuana as OK; It's a Dangerous Trend" (USA TODAY, February 23,2012 ) describes two surveys of U.S. high school students. One survey was conducted in 2009 and the other was conducted in \(2011 .\) In \(2009,78 \%\) of the people in a representative sample of 2300 students said marijuana use is very distracting or extremely distracting to their driving. In \(2011,70 \%\) of the people in a representative sample of 2294 students answered this way. Use the five-step process for estimation problems \(\left(\mathrm{EMC}^{3}\right)\) to construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) large-sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of high school students who believed marijuana was very distracting or extremely distracting in 2009 and this proportion in 2011 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.