/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 Use the definition of the \(P\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the definition of the \(P\) -value to explain the following: a. Why \(H_{0}\) would be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=0.003\) b. Why \(H_{0}\) would not be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=0.350\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The P-value of 0.003 is smaller than the typical significance level (α = 0.05), indicating strong evidence against H₀, leading to its rejection. b. The P-value of 0.350 is larger than the typical significance level (α = 0.05), indicating insufficient evidence against H₀, thus it would not be rejected.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the definition of P-value

The P-value, in the context of hypothesis testing, is a measure of the evidence against a null hypothesis (Hâ‚€). It represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as or more extreme than the one resulting from the sample data, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
02

Compare P-value and Significance Level

To determine whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis, we compare the P-value to a predetermined significance level (α). If the P-value is less than α, we reject H₀; otherwise, we fail to reject H₀. A common choice for α is 0.05, though this value can be adjusted depending on the context and desired level of confidence in the decision. a. Why H₀ would be rejected if P-value = 0.003
03

Comparing P-value to Significance Level (α) for Scenario A

In this scenario, the P-value is 0.003, which is quite small. When comparing this P-value with a typical significance level, such as α = 0.05, we will notice that the P-value is smaller (0.003 < 0.05).
04

Rejecting Null Hypothesis for Scenario A

Since the P-value is smaller than the significance level, this indicates that there is strong evidence against the null hypothesis. In this case, the null hypothesis would be rejected. b. Why Hâ‚€ would not be rejected if P-value = 0.350
05

Comparing P-value to Significance Level (α) for Scenario B

In this scenario, the P-value is 0.350, which is relatively large. When comparing this P-value with a typical significance level, such as α = 0.05, we will notice that the P-value is larger (0.350 > 0.05).
06

Not Rejecting Null Hypothesis for Scenario B

Since the P-value is larger than the significance level, this indicates that there is not strong enough evidence against the null hypothesis. In this case, the null hypothesis would not be rejected.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make decisions about a population parameter based on a sample. It involves two complementary hypotheses:
  • The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)), which suggests no effect or no difference, and acts as the default assumption.
  • The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)), which suggests a new effect or a difference, contrary to the null hypothesis.
The goal of hypothesis testing is to determine which hypothesis is more consistent with the data collected. We do this by calculating the P-value, which quantifies the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis in the sample data.
The smaller the P-value, the stronger the evidence against \(H_0\). This is a crucial step in making data-driven decisions based on statistical evidence.
Null Hypothesis Explained
The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) plays a key role in hypothesis testing. It represents the assumption that there is no effect or no difference in the population. For example, if we are testing a new drug, \(H_0\) might state that the drug has no effect on a certain medical condition.
The null hypothesis acts as a starting point for testing. It allows researchers to approach the problem without any preconceived notions or bias. Importantly, the goal is not to "prove" the null hypothesis but to challenge it. We assess the probability of observing our sample data if \(H_0\) is true. If this probability, expressed as the P-value, falls below a certain threshold, \(H_0\) may be considered unlikely.
At the core, the null hypothesis is a precautionary measure. It ensures that claims of effects or differences are made only when supported by substantial evidence.
Significance Level and Its Importance
The significance level, often denoted by \(\alpha\), is the threshold used to decide when to reject the null hypothesis. Commonly, a significance level of 0.05 is used, indicating a 5% risk of rejecting \(H_0\) when it is actually true.
Selecting the right significance level is crucial:
  • A \(\alpha\) of 0.01 indicates a stricter threshold, emphasizing low tolerance for risk and chance of error. This is often used in fields where error costs are high, such as medicine.
  • A \(\alpha\) of 0.10 might be used in exploratory studies where it is vital to detect every potential effect, even at the risk of higher false positives.
The significance level defines what is "unlikely enough" under the null hypothesis. When the P-value is less than \(\alpha\), we have enough evidence to feel comfortable rejecting \(H_0\) and suggesting results in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Rejecting the Null Hypothesis
Rejecting the null hypothesis occurs when the P-value is less than the significance level \(\alpha\). This indicates that the observed data is inconsistent with \(H_0\) and offers strong evidence for considering the alternative hypothesis \(H_1\).
This decision carries implications:
  • It does not mean that \(H_0\) is absolutely false but rather that the data provide strong enough evidence to favor \(H_1\).
  • The practical significance of this decision should also be considered in context. Statistically significant results may not always imply a meaningful or important effect in real-world terms.
Rejecting \(H_0\) can lead to changes in scientific understanding, business practices, or policy making. It's an essential part of using statistics to drive informed actions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why a \(P\) -value of 0.002 would be interpreted as strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

According to a survey of a random sample of 2278 adult Americans conducted by the Harris Poll ("Do Americans Prefer Name Brands or Store Brands? Well, That Depends" (theharrispoll.com, February 11, 2015, retrieved November 29,2016 ), 1162 of those surveyed said that they prefer name brands to store brands when purchasing frozen vegetables. Suppose that you want to use this information to determine if there is convincing evidence that a majority of adult Americans prefer name-brand frozen vegetables over store brand frozen vegetables. a. What hypotheses should be tested in order to answer this question? b. The \(P\) -value for this test is 0.173 . What conclusion would you reach if \(\alpha=0.05 ?\)

According to a large national survey conducted by the Pew Research Center ("What Americans Think About NSA Surveillance, National Security and Privacy," May \(2,2015,\) wwW.pewresearch.org, retrieved December 1,2016 ), \(54 \%\) of adult Americans disapprove of the National Security Agency collecting records of phone and Internet data. Suppose that this estimate was based on a random sample of 1000 adult Americans. a. Is there convincing evidence that a majority of adult Americans feel this way? Test the relevant hypotheses using a 0.05 significance level. b. The actual sample size was much larger than 1000 . If you had used the actual sample size when doing the calculations for the test in Part (a), would the \(P\) -value have been larger than, the same as, or smaller than the \(P\) -value you obtained in Part (a)? Provide a justification for your answer.

Which of the following specify legitimate pairs of null and alternative hypotheses? a. \(H_{0}: p=0.25 \quad H_{i}: p>0.25\) b. \(H_{0}: p<0.40 \quad H_{i}: p>0.40\) c. \(H_{0}: p=0.40 \quad H: p<0.65\) d. \(H_{0}: p \neq 0.50 \quad H_{i}: p=0.50\) e. \(H_{\mathrm{n}}: p=0.50 \quad H_{i}: p>0.50\) f. \(H_{0}: \hat{p}=0.25 \quad H_{e^{\prime}} \hat{p}>0.25\)

In a hypothesis test, what does it mean to say that the null hypothesis was rejected?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.