/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 One type of error in a hypothesi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

One type of error in a hypothesis test is failing to reject a false null hypothesis. What is the other type of error that might occur when a hypothesis test is carried out?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The other type of error that might occur when a hypothesis test is carried out is Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis. This error occurs when the researcher finds evidence against the null hypothesis when it is actually true and can lead to misleading conclusions or incorrect decisions.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the two types of errors in hypothesis testing

In hypothesis testing, we compare a null hypothesis (H鈧) with an alternative hypothesis (H鈧). There are two types of errors that can occur while making a decision based on this test: 1. Type I error: Rejecting a true null hypothesis 2. Type II error: Failing to reject a false null hypothesis The exercise provides the definition of Type II error. Now, let's find the other type of error.
02

Identify the other type of error

The other type of error that might occur when a hypothesis test is carried out is Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis. This error occurs when the researcher finds evidence against the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
03

Understand the consequences of Type I error

Type I error can lead to falsely concluding that there is a significant effect or difference when there really is none. This can result in a misleading conclusion or incorrect decision, which can have real-life consequences, especially in fields like medicine or public policy. It is important for researchers to be aware of the potential for Type I error and to carefully design their studies to minimize the probability of making this type of error.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Error
A Type I error is one of the two main errors that can occur in hypothesis testing. It happens when the null hypothesis, which is the default position that there is no effect or no difference, is incorrectly rejected. Imagine a fire alarm that goes off without a fire; that's akin to committing a Type I error in statistics - a false positive.

To put it in the context of a courtroom, a Type I error would be analogous to convicting an innocent person. The null hypothesis represents the assumption of innocence, and rejecting it unfairly would mean an innocent verdict was disregarded. Scientists usually set a threshold of significance denoted as \( \alpha \) before conducting a study to control the likelihood of making a Type I error. A common \( \alpha \) level is 0.05, indicating a 5% risk of committing a Type I error in any given test.
Type II Error
Conversely, a Type II error occurs when a false null hypothesis is not rejected. This is equivalent to a 'missed opportunity' to identify an actual effect or difference. Consider this as a security checkpoint missing a prohibited item in a bag 鈥 the error is a false negative.

In the judicial example, a Type II error would be like letting a guilty person go free. The consequence of this error could mean missing out on important discoveries or safety measures because the evidence wasn't deemed strong enough to challenge the status quo. Researchers strive to reduce the chances of committing Type II errors by increasing their study's power, which can be accomplished by increasing the sample size or choosing more sensitive measures, amongst other strategies.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis (denoted as \( H_0 \) ) is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing that serves as a starting presumption. It assumes there is no difference or effect regarding the subject matter of the research. For instance, if scientists were investigating a new drug, the null hypothesis would propose that the drug has no effect on patients compared to a placebo.

It is essential to understand that the null hypothesis is not a claim that seeks proof but rather a statement that's intended to be challenged by the alternative hypothesis. Researchers gather data through experimentation, and if the data strongly conflict with the null hypothesis, it may be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (denoted as \( H_a \) or \( H_1 \) ) stands in opposition to the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is an effect, difference, or correlation. Following the new drug example, the alternative hypothesis would propose that the drug has a significant impact on patients' health.

In hypothesis testing, researchers aim to gather sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. However, for this to occur, they need to reach a level of significance that is unlikely to be due to chance alone, often below the \( \alpha \) threshold. The alternative hypothesis is what researchers typically hope to confirm, representing new discoveries or advancements in their field.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Medical personnel are required to report suspected cases of child abuse. Because some diseases have symptoms that are similar to those of child abuse, doctors who see a child with these symptoms must decide between two competing hypotheses: \(H_{0}:\) symptoms are due to child abuse \(H:\) symptoms are not due to child abuse (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) The article "Blurred Line Between Illness, Abuse Creates Problem for Authorities" (Macon Telegraph, February \(28,\) 2000 ) included the following quote from a doctor in Atlanta regarding the consequences of making an incorrect decision: "If it's disease, the worst you have is an angry family. If it is abuse, the other kids (in the family) are in deadly danger." a. For the given hypotheses, describe Type I and Type II errors. b. Based on the quote regarding consequences of the two kinds of error, which type of error is considered more serious by the doctor quoted? Explain.

For which of the following \(P\) -values will the null hypothesis be rejected when performing a test with a significance level of \(0.05 ?\) a. 0.001 d. 0.047 b. 0.021 e. 0.148 c. 0.078

An automobile manufacturer is considering using robots for part of its assembly process. Converting to robots is expensive, so it will be done only if there is strong evidence that the proportion of defective installations is less for the robots than for human assemblers. Let \(p\) denote the actual proportion of defective installations for the robots. It is known that the proportion of defective installations for human assemblers is 0.02 . a. Which of the following pairs of hypotheses should the manufacturer test? $$ H_{0}: p=0.02 \text { versus } H_{a}: p<0.02 $$ or $$ H_{0}: p=0.02 \text { versus } H_{a}: p>0.02 $$ Explain your choice. b. In the context of this exercise, describe Type 1 and Type II errors. c. Would you prefer a test with \(\alpha=0.01\) or \(\alpha=0.10 ?\) Explain your reasoning.

Past experience is that when individuals are approached with a request to fill out and return a particular questionnaire in a provided stamped and addressed envelope, the response rate is \(40 \%\). An investigator believes that if the person distributing the questionnaire were stigmatized in some obvious way, potential respondents would feel sorry for the distributor and thus tend to respond at a rate higher than \(40 \%\). To test this theory, a distributor wore an eye patch. Of the 200 questionnaires distributed by this individual, 109 were returned. Does this provide evidence that the response rate in this situation is greater than the previous rate of \(40 \%\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance plevel of 0.05 .

In the report "Healthy People 2020 Objectives for the Nation," The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) set a goal of 0.341 for the proportion of mothers who will still be breastfeeding their babies one year after birth (www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/policy /hp2020.htm, April 11, 2016, retrieved November 28, 2016). The CDC also estimated the proportion who were still being breastfed one year after birth to be 0.307 for babies born in 2013 (www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding /pdf/2016breastfeedingreportcard.pdf, retrieved November 28,2016) . This estimate was based on a survey of women who had given birth in 2013 . Suppose that the survey used a random sample of 1000 mothers and that you want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that the goal is not being met. Let \(p\) denote the population proportion of all mothers of babies born in 2013 who were still breast-feeding at 12 months. (Hint: See Example \(10.10 .)\) a. Describe the shape, center, and variability of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.333\) for a sample of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.310\) for a sample of size 1000 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.341\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(p=0.307\). Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the goal is not being met, or is the observed sample proportion consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.