/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 Use the linear correlation coeff... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 10

Use the linear correlation coefficient given to determine the coefficient of determination, \(R^{2} .\) Interpret each \(R^{2}\) (a) \(r=-0.32\) (b) \(r=0.13\) (c) \(r=0.40\) (d) \(r=0.93\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
For r=-0.32, R虏=0.1024. For r=0.13, R虏=0.0169. For r=0.40, R虏=0.16. For r=0.93, R虏=0.8649.

Step by step solution

01

- Understanding the Relationship Between r and R虏

The coefficient of determination, denoted as \(R^2\), is calculated by squaring the linear correlation coefficient, denoted as \(r\). It explains the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable.
02

- Calculate R虏 for r = -0.32

To find \(R^2\) for \(r = -0.32\), square the value of \(r\): \[R^2 = (-0.32)^2 = 0.1024\] Thus, \(R^2 = 0.1024\). This means approximately 10.24% of the variance in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable.
03

- Calculate R虏 for r = 0.13

To find \(R^2\) for \(r = 0.13\), square the value of \(r\): \[R^2 = (0.13)^2 = 0.0169\] Thus, \(R^2 = 0.0169\). This means approximately 1.69% of the variance in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable.
04

- Calculate R虏 for r = 0.40

To find \(R^2\) for \(r = 0.40\), square the value of \(r\): \[R^2 = (0.40)^2 = 0.16\] Thus, \(R^2 = 0.16\). This means approximately 16% of the variance in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable.
05

- Calculate R虏 for r = 0.93

To find \(R^2\) for \(r = 0.93\), square the value of \(r\): \[R^2 = (0.93)^2 = 0.8649\] Thus, \(R^2 = 0.8649\). This means approximately 86.49% of the variance in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable.
06

- Summarize Results

For \(r = -0.32\), \(R^2 = 0.1024\) which means 10.24% predictability. For \(r = 0.13\), \(R^2 = 0.0169\) which means 1.69% predictability. For \(r = 0.40\), \(R^2 = 0.16\) which means 16% predictability. For \(r = 0.93\), \(R^2 = 0.8649\) which means 86.49% predictability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

linear correlation coefficient
The linear correlation coefficient, also known as Pearson's correlation coefficient, is a measure of the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It's denoted by the symbol \( r \). The value of \( r \) ranges from -1 to 1. When \( r \) is close to 1, it indicates a strong positive linear relationship. Conversely, when \( r \) is close to -1, it shows a strong negative linear relationship. An \( r \) value near 0 suggests no linear correlation between the variables.
variance
Variance is a statistical concept that measures the dispersion or spread of a set of numbers. In simpler terms, it shows how much the numbers in a dataset differ from the mean of the dataset. Higher variance indicates that the numbers are more spread out from the mean, while lower variance indicates that the numbers are close to the mean.
Variance is a crucial concept in calculating the coefficient of determination because \( R^2 \) explains how much of the variance in the dependent variable can be predicted by the independent variable.
predictability
Predictability in statistics refers to the extent to which we can predict the value of one variable based on the value of another variable. The coefficient of determination, \( R^2 \), quantifies this predictability.
For example, if \( R^2 = 0.8649 \), it means 86.49% of the variance in the dependent variable is predictable from the independent variable, thus indicating a high level of predictability. Lower \( R^2 \) values indicate lower predictability. Understanding how much variance is predictable helps analysts make informed decisions based on data-driven insights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

American Black Bears The American black bear (Ursus americanus) is one of eight bear species in the world. It is the smallest North American bear and the most common bear species on the planet. In 1969 , Dr. Michael R. Pelton of the University of Tennessee initiated a long-term study of the population in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. One aspect of the study was to develop a model that could be used to predict a bear's weight (since it is not practical to weigh bears in the field). One variable thought to be related to weight is the length of the bear. The following data represent the lengths and weights of 12 . American black bears. (a) Which variable is the explanatory variable based on the goals of the research? (b) Draw a scatter diagram of the data. (c) Determine the linear correlation coefficient between weight and length. (d) Does a linear relation exist between the weight of the bear and its length?

The time it takes for a planet to complete its orbit around the sun is called the planet's sidereal year. In 1618 , Johannes Kepler discovered that the sidereal year of a planet is related to the distance the planet is from the sun. The following data show the distances of the planets, and the dwarf planet Pluto, from the sun and their sidereal years. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Planet } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Distance from Sun, } x \\ \text { (millions of miles) } \end{array} & \text { Sidereal Year, } \boldsymbol{y} \\ \hline \text { Mercury } & 36 & 0.24 \\ \hline \text { Venus } & 67 & 0.62 \\ \hline \text { Earth } & 93 & 1.00 \\ \hline \text { Mars } & 142 & 1.88 \\ \hline \text { Jupiter } & 483 & 11.9 \\ \hline \text { Saturn } & 887 & 29.5 \\ \hline \text { Uranus } & 1785 & 84.0 \\ \hline \text { Neptune } & 2797 & 165.0 \\ \hline \text { Pluto } & 3675 & 248.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Draw a scatter diagram of the data treating distance from the sun as the explanatory variable. (b) Determine the correlation between distance and sidereal year. Does this imply a linear relation between distance and sidereal year? (c) Compute the least-squares regression line. (d) Plot the residuals against the distance from the sun. (e) Do you think the least-squares regression line is a good model? Why?

The wind chill factor depends on wind speed and air temperature. The following data represent the wind speed (in mph) and wind chill factor at an air temperature of \(15^{\circ}\) Fahrenheit. $$ \begin{array}{cc|cc} \begin{array}{l} \text { Wind } \\ \text { Speed, } x \\ (\mathrm{mph}) \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Wind Chill } \\ \text { Factor, } y \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Wind } \\ \text { Speed, } x \\ (\mathrm{mph}) \end{array} & \begin{array}{l} \text { Wind Chill } \\ \text { Factor, } y \end{array} \\ \hline 5 & 12 & 25 & -22 \\ \hline 10 & -3 & 30 & -25 \\ \hline 15 & -11 & 35 & -27 \\ \hline 20 & -17 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Draw a scatter diagram of the data treating wind speed as the explanatory variable. (b) Determine the correlation between wind speed and wind chill factor. Does this imply a linear relation between wind speed and wind chill factor? (c) Compute the least-squares regression line. (d) Plot the residuals against the wind speed. (e) Do you think the least-squares regression line is a good model? Why?

(a) By hand, draw a scatter diagram treating \(x\) as the explanatory variable and y as the response variable. (b) Select two points from the scatter diagram and find the equation of the line containing the points selected. (c) Graph the line found in part (b) on the scatter diagram. (d) By hand, determine the least-squares regression line. (e) Graph the least-squares regression line on the scatter diagram. (f) Compute the sum of the squared residuals for the line found in part (b). (g) Compute the sum of the squared residuals for the leastsquares regression line found in part (d). (h) Comment on the fit of the line found in part (b) versus the least-squares regression line found in part ( \(d\) ). $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrr} \hline x & 20 & 30 & 40 & 50 & 60 \\ \hline y & 100 & 95 & 91 & 83 & 70 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Name the Relation, Part I For each of the following statements, explain whether you think the variables will have positive correlation, negative correlation, or no correlation. Support your opinion. (a) Number of children in the household under the age of 3 and expenditures on diapers (b) Interest rates on car loans and number of cars sold (c) Number of hours per week on the treadmill and cholesterol level (d) Price of a Big Mac and number of McDonald's French fries sold in a week (e) Shoe size and IQ
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.