/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q169SE Question: Forecasting a job appl... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Question: Forecasting a job applicant鈥檚 merit rating. A large research and development firm rates the performance of each member of its technical staff on a scale of 0 to 100, and this merit rating is used to determine the size of the person鈥檚 pay raise for the coming year. The firm鈥檚 personnel department is interested in developing a regression model to help forecast the merit rating that an applicant for a technical position will receive after being employed for 3 years. The firm proposes to use the following second-order model to forecast the merit ratings of applicants who have just completed their graduate studies and have no prior related job experience:

E(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x1x2+4x12+5x22, where

y = Applicant鈥檚 merit rating after 3 years

x1= Applicant鈥檚 GPA in graduate school

x2= Applicant鈥檚 total score (verbal plus quantitative) on the Graduate Record Examination (GRE)

The model, fit to data collected for a random sample of n=40employees, resulted inSSE=1830.44andSSmodel=4911.5. The reduced modelE(y)=0+1x1+2x2 is also fit to the same data, resulting inSSE=3197.16.

  1. Identify the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses to test whether the complete (second-order) model contributes information for predicting y.
  2. Conduct the test of the hypothesis given in part a. Test using. Interpret the results in the context of this problem.
  3. Identify the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses to test whether the complete model contributes more information than the reduced (first-order) model for predicting y.
  4. Conduct the test of the hypothesis given in part c. Test using. Interpret the results in the context of this problem.
  5. Which model, if either, would you use to predict y? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

  1. The null and alternate hypothesis for testing whether the second order model contributes information for the prediction of y can be written as
    H0:4=5=0while At least one of the parameters 3,4or5or is non-zero.
  2. At a 95% significance level450 , the second-order model doesn鈥檛 contribute much to the model.
  3. The null and alternate hypotheses for testing whether the complete model contributes more information than the reduced model for the prediction of y can be written asH0:3=4=5=0 while

At least one of the parameters3,4or5.

4. At the 95% significance level, at least one of the parameters 3,4or5is non-zero.

5. Since the hypothesis testing concludes the complete model is a better fit for the data, the complete model would be more useful for predicting y.

Step by step solution

01

Given information 

The second order model used by the firm is given as Ey=0+1x1+2x2+3x1x2+4x12+5x22,there are 40 observations and the,SSE=1830.44,SSmodel=4911.5 .

The reduced model is given where and the test needs to be conducted .

02

(a) Hypothesis statement

The Research and development firm is doing a regression analysis to find if certain variables affect their employees鈥 merit scores or not. The firm first fits a second-order equation and then fits a reduced equation with only one variable.

Here, the null and alternate hypotheses for testing whether the second order model contributes information for the prediction of y can be written asH0:4=5=0while

At least one of the parameters4or5 is non-zero.

03

(b) Hypothesis testing

H0:4=5=0

Ha :At least one of the parameters4or5 is non-zero.

Here,

F-teststatistic=SSEn-k+1=1830.4440-6=53.836

Value of F0.05,39,39is 1.509.

H0 :is rejected if F-statistic>F0.05,39,39.

There is sufficient evidence to reject H0at 95% confidence interval.

Therefore, 450meaning that the second order model contributes much to the model.

04

(c) Hypothesis statement

The null and alternate hypothesis for testing whether the complete model contributes more information than the reduced model for the prediction of y can be written asH0:3=4=5=0
while At least one of the parameters 3,4or5is non-zero.

05

(d) Hypothesis testing

H0:3=4=5=0

Ha:At least one of the parameters 3,4or5is non-zero.

Teststatistic=SSER-SSECk-gSSECn-k+1=3197.16-1830.443-11830.4440-3+1=13.4401

For=.05,F-Test statistic = 13.4401.

The numerator degree of freedom is k 鈥 g =2, and the denominator degree of freedom is n 鈥 (k+1) = 36.

We know that it is rejected if

The critical value of F0.05 = 3.37, since F-statistic>F0.05, therefore, at95%confidence interval we reject H0.

Therefore, at least one of the parameters3,4or5 is non-zero.

06

(e) Interpretation

The results of the hypothesis testing show that the complete model fits the data better. It would be more useful to predict y.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Accuracy of software effort estimates. Refer to the Journal of Empirical Software Engineering (Vol. 9, 2004) study of the accuracy of new software effort estimates, Exercise 12.114 (p. 781). Recall that stepwise regression was used to develop a model for the relative error in estimating effort (y) as a function of company role of estimator (x1 = 1 if developer, 0 if project leader) and previous accuracy (x8 = 1 if more than 20% accurate, 0 if less than 20% accurate). The stepwise regression yielded the prediction equation y^= 0.12 - 0.28x1+ 0.27x8. The researcher is concerned that the sign of the estimated multiplied by x1 is the opposite from what is expected. (The researcher expects a project leader to have a smaller relative error of estimation than a developer.) Give at least one reason why this phenomenon occurred.

Question: Adverse effects of hot-water runoff. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to determine whether the hot-water runoff from a particular power plant located near a large gulf is having an adverse effect on the marine life in the area. The goal is to acquire a prediction equation for the number of marine animals located at certain designated areas, or stations, in the gulf. Based on past experience, the EPA considered the following environmental factors as predictors for the number of animals at a particular station:

X1 = Temperature of water (TEMP)

X2 = Salinity of water (SAL)

X3 = Dissolved oxygen content of water (DO)

X4 = Turbidity index, a measure of the turbidity of the water (TI)

x5 = Depth of the water at the station (ST_DEPTH)

x6 = Total weight of sea grasses in sampled area (TGRSWT)

As a preliminary step in the construction of this model, the EPA used a stepwise regression procedure to identify the most important of these six variables. A total of 716 samples were taken at different stations in the gulf, producing the SPSS printout shown below. (The response measured was y, the logarithm of the number of marine animals found in the sampled area.)

a. According to the SPSS printout, which of the six independent variables should be used in the model? (Use 伪 = .10.)

b. Are we able to assume that the EPA has identified all the important independent variables for the prediction of y? Why?

c. Using the variables identified in part a, write the first-order model with interaction that may be used to predict y.

d. How would the EPA determine whether the model specified in part c is better than the first-order model?

e.Note the small value of R2. What action might the EPA take to improve the model?

Role of retailer interest on shopping behavior. Retail interest is defined by marketers as the level of interest a consumer has in a given retail store. Marketing professors investigated the role of retailer interest in consumers鈥 shopping behavior (Journal of Retailing, Summer 2006). Using survey data collected for n = 375 consumers, the professors developed an interaction model for y = willingness of the consumer to shop at a retailer鈥檚 store in the future (called repatronage intentions) as a function of = consumer satisfaction and = retailer interest. The regression results are shown below.

(a) Is the overall model statistically useful for predicting y? Test using a=0.05

(b )Conduct a test for interaction at a= 0.05.

(c) Use the estimates to sketch the estimated relationship between repatronage intentions (y) and satisfaction when retailer interest is x2=1 (a low value).

(d)Repeat part c when retailer interest is x2= 7(a high value).

(e) Sketch the two lines, parts c and d, on the same graph to illustrate the nature of the interaction.

State casket sales restrictions. Some states permit only licensed firms to sell funeral goods (e.g., caskets, urns) to the consumer, while other states have no restrictions. States with casket sales restrictions are being challenged in court to lift these monopolistic restrictions. A paper in the Journal of Law and Economics (February 2008) used multiple regression to investigate the impact of lifting casket sales restrictions on the cost of a funeral. Data collected for a sample of 1,437 funerals were used to fit the model. A simpler version of the model estimated by the researchers is E(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x1x2, where y is the price (in dollars) of a direct burial, x1 = {1 if funeral home is in a restricted state, 0 if not}, and x2 = {1 if price includes a basic wooden casket, 0 if no casket}. The estimated equation (with standard errors in parentheses) is:

y^=1432 + 793x1- 252x2+ 261x1x2, R2= 0.78

(70) (134) (109)

  1. Calculate the predicted price of a direct burial with a basic wooden casket at a funeral home in a restricted state.

  2. The data include a direct burial funeral with a basic wooden casket at a funeral home in a restricted state that costs \(2,200. Assuming the standard deviation of the model is \)50, is this data value an outlier?

  3. The data also include a direct burial funeral with a basic wooden casket at a funeral home in a restricted state that costs \(2,500. Again, assume that the standard deviation of the model is \)50. Is this data value an outlier?

Question: Workplace bullying and intention to leave. Workplace bullying has been shown to have a negative psychological effect on victims, often leading the victim to quit or resign. In Human Resource Management Journal (October 2008), researchers employed multiple regression to examine whether perceived organizational support (POS) would moderate the relationship between workplace bullying and victims鈥 intention to leave the firm. The dependent variable in the analysis, intention to leave (y), was measured on a quantitative scale. The two key independent variables in the study were bullying (, measured on a quantitative scale) and perceived organizational support (measured qualitatively as 鈥渓ow,鈥 鈥渘eutral,鈥 or 鈥渉igh鈥).

  1. Set up the dummy variables required to represent POS in the regression model.
  2. Write a model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three parallel straight lines, one for each level of POS.
  3. Write a model for E(y) as a function of bullying and POS that hypothesizes three non-parallel straight lines, one for each level of POS.
  4. The researchers discovered that the effect of bullying on intention to leave was greater at the low level of POS than at the high level of POS. Which of the two models, parts b and c, support these findings?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.