/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q166SE Question: Forecasting daily admi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Question: Forecasting daily admission of a water park (cont鈥檇). Refer to Exercise 12.165. The owners of the water adventure park are advised that the prediction model could probably be improved if interaction terms were added. In particular, it is thought that the rate at which mean attendance increases as predicted high temperature increases will be greater on weekends than on weekdays.

The following model is therefore proposed:

E(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x3+4x1x3

The same 30 days of data used in Exercise 12.165 are again used to obtain the least squares model,y^=250-700x1+100x2+5x3+15x1x3 with s4=3,R2=0.96.

a. Graph the predicted day鈥檚 attendance, y, against the day鈥檚 predicted high temperature,, for a sunny weekday and for a sunny weekend day. Plot both on the same graph forbetweenand. Note the increase in slope for the weekend day. Interpret this.

b. Do the data indicate that the interaction term is a useful addition to the model? Use=.05.

c. Use this model to predict the attendance for a sunny weekday with a predicted high temperature of95F.

d. Suppose the 90%prediction interval for part c is (800, 850). Compare this result with the prediction interval for the model without interaction in Exercise 12.165, part e. Do the relative widths of the confidence intervals support or refute your conclusion about the utility of the interaction term (part b)?

e. The owners, noting that the coefficient^1=-700, conclude the model is ridiculous because it seems to imply that the mean attendance will be 700 less on weekends than on weekdays. Explain why this is not the case.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

a. Graph of the predicted days attendance.

b. Thevalue for the model is 0.96 indicating that 96% of the variation in the data is explained by the model meaning that the model is a good fit for the data. This means that the interaction term is useful in explaining model.

c. The predicted attendance on a sunny weekday at a temperature of95Fis 825.

d. The 90% prediction interval for daily attendance is (800, 850) indicating that the future values of the dependent variables will fall between the interval. From part c, the value of 825 is also falling into the prediction interval.

e. The coefficient of x1 is -700 indicating that there is an inverse relation between attendance and days of the week. The number 700 indicates that for every 1 unit change in attendance, the no of days鈥 changes by 700.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The least square regression equation is:

y^=250-700x1+100x2+5x3+15x1x3

02

Graph

a.

The question involves interpretingvalues which represents the fraction of the sample variation of the y-values (measured by) that is explained by the least squares prediction equation.

The graph can be drawn by taking individual values of y and , for second line y and to understand the effect of individual x variables on the dependent variable y.

03

Interaction term

b.

TheR2 value for the model is 0.96 indicating that 96% of the variation in the data is explained by the model meaning that the model is a good fit for the data. This means that the interaction term is useful in explaining model.

04

Prediction value

c.

The regression equation is y^=250-700x1+100x2+5x3+15x1x3.The prediction value of daily attendance on sunny weekday at 95鈦癋 can be calculated when , x1=1,x2=1andx3=95.

y^=250-7000+1000+595+1501y^=825

Therefore, the predicted attendance on a sunny weekday at a temperature of 95Fis 825.

05

Prediction interval 

d.

The 90% prediction interval for daily attendance is (800, 850) indicating that the future values of the dependent variables will fall between the interval. From part c, the value of 825 is also falling into the prediction interval.

06

Implication of coefficient of x1

e.

The coefficient of is -700 indicating that there is an inverse relation between attendance and days of the week. The number 700 indicates that for every 1 unit change in attendance, the no of days鈥 decreases by 700.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Tilting in online poker. In poker, making bad decisions due to negative emotions is known as tilting. A study in the Journal of Gambling Studies (March, 2014) investigated the factors that affect the severity of tilting for online poker players. A survey of 214 online poker players produced data on the dependent variable, severity of tilting (y), measured on a 30-point scale (where higher values indicate a higher severity of tilting). Two independent variables measured were poker experience (x1, measured on a 30-point scale) and perceived effect of experience on tilting (x2, measured on a 28-point scale). The researchers fit the interaction model, . The results are shown below (p-values in parentheses).

  1. Evaluate the overall adequacy of the model using 伪 = .01.

b. The researchers hypothesize that the rate of change of severity of tilting (y) with perceived effect of experience on tilting (x2) depends on poker experience (x1). Do you agree? Test using 伪 = .01.

Question:How is the number of degrees of freedom available for estimating 2(the variance of ) related to the number of independent variables in a regression model?

Write a model that relates E(y) to two independent variables鈥攐ne quantitative and one qualitative at four levels. Construct a model that allows the associated response curves to be second-order but does not allow for interaction between the two independent variables.

Consider the model:

E(y)=0+1x1+2x2+3x22+4x3+5x1x22

where x2 is a quantitative model and

x1=(1receivedtreatment0didnotreceivetreatment)

The resulting least squares prediction equation is

localid="1649802968695" y=2+x1-5x2+3x22-4x3+x1x22

a. Substitute the values for the dummy variables to determine the curves relating to the mean value E(y) in general form.

b. On the same graph, plot the curves obtained in part a for the independent variable between 0 and 3. Use the least squares prediction equation.

Question: Women in top management. Refer to the Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict (July 2007) study on women in upper management positions at U.S. firms, Exercise 11.73 (p. 679). Monthly data (n = 252 months) were collected for several variables in an attempt to model the number of females in managerial positions (y). The independent variables included the number of females with a college degree (x1), the number of female high school graduates with no college degree (x2), the number of males in managerial positions (x3), the number of males with a college degree (x4), and the number of male high school graduates with no college degree (x5). The correlations provided in Exercise 11.67 are given in each part. Determine which of the correlations results in a potential multicollinearity problem for the regression analysis.

  1. The correlation relating number of females in managerial positions and number of females with a college degree: r =0.983.

  2. The correlation relating number of females in managerial positions and number of female high school graduates with no college degree: r =0.074.

  3. The correlation relating number of males in managerial positions and number of males with a college degree: r =0.722.

  4. The correlation relating number of males in managerial positions and number of male high school graduates with no college degree: r =0.528.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.