/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 82 Consider a sample of \(x_{1}, x_... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a sample of \(x_{1}, x_{2}, ., x_{n},\) observations from a Weibull distribution with parameters a and \(\beta\) and density function $$f i x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}\int \alpha \beta x^{\beta-1} e^{-\alpha x^{A}} & x>0 \\ 0, & \text { elsewhere }\end{array}\right.$$ for \(\alpha, 3>0\) (a) Write out the likelihood function. (b) Write out the equations which when solved give the maximum likelihood estimators of \(a\) and ,3.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The likelihood function for the provided density function is \(L(\alpha, \beta; x) = \alpha^{n} \beta^{n} \prod_{i=1}^{n} [x_{i}^{\beta-1} e^{-\alpha x_{i}^{\beta}}]\). The log-likelihood function, which simplifies this product into a sum, is \(l(\alpha, \beta; x) = n \ln\alpha + n \ln\beta + (\beta - 1)\sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i} - \alpha \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\beta}\). The maximum likelihood estimators of \(a\) and \(\beta\) are found by setting the derivates equal to zero of this log-likelihood function.

Step by step solution

01

Derive the Likelihood Function

The likelihood function is obtained from the joint density function of the n observations. Because the observations are independent, the joint density function is simply the product of individual density functions. So for \(x_{1}, x_{2}, ..., x_{n}\), the likelihood function \(L(\alpha, \beta; x)\) is given by\[L(\alpha, \beta; x) = \prod_{i=1}^{n}[\alpha \beta x_{i}^{\beta-1} e^{-\alpha x_{i}^{\beta}}] = \alpha^{n} \beta^{n} \prod_{i=1}^{n} [x_{i}^{\beta-1} e^{-\alpha x_{i}^{\beta}}]\]
02

Logarithm of the Likelihood Function

It is often more convenient to work with the natural logarithm of the likelihood function, as this simplifies the product into a sum. The log-likelihood function \(l(\alpha, \beta; x)\) is given by\[l(\alpha, \beta; x) = \ln[L(\alpha, \beta; x)] = n \ln\alpha + n \ln\beta + (\beta - 1)\sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i} - \alpha \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\beta}\]
03

Derive the Maximum Likelihood Estimators

To find the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of parameters \(a\) and \(\beta\), we take the derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to these parameters, set the derivatives equal to zero and solve for the parameters. This gives two equations:\[\frac{dl}{d\alpha} = 0 -> \frac{n}{\alpha} - \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{A} = 0\]\[\frac{dl}{d\beta} = 0 -> \frac{n}{\beta} + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i} - \alpha \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\beta} \ln x_{i} = 0\]These are the equations that, when solved, give the maximum likelihood estimators of \(a\) and \(\beta\). However, these are not easy to solve analytically, so numerical methods are typically used.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a continuous probability distribution widely used in reliability engineering, lifetime modeling, and failure analysis. It is specifically handy for modeling time-to-event data. The distribution is characterized by two parameters: a shape parameter, \( \beta \), and a scale parameter, \( \alpha \).
  • The shape parameter, \( \beta \), determines the distribution's form. If \( \beta < 1 \), the hazard function decreases over time. If \( \beta = 1 \), we have an exponential distribution with a constant hazard, and if \( \beta > 1 \), the hazard function increases.
  • The scale parameter, \( \alpha \), stretches or shrinks the distribution along the x-axis. Larger values of \( \alpha \) stretch the distribution, affecting its spread.
In practical scenarios, Weibull distributions are used to analyze reliability tests and model various types of data predicting life spans and failure rates.
Likelihood Function
A likelihood function is a fundamental concept in statistics. It expresses the probability of observing a given data set under specific statistical parameters. In our context, considering a sample from a Weibull distribution, the likelihood function reflects the likelihood of observing the data given our parameters \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \). The likelihood function \( L(\alpha, \beta; x) \) for independent and identically distributed samples \( x_1, x_2, ..., x_n \) from a Weibull distribution is derived as:\[ L(\alpha, \beta; x) = \prod_{i=1}^{n} [\alpha \beta x_{i}^{\beta-1} e^{-\alpha x_{i}^{\beta}}] = \alpha^{n} \beta^{n} \prod_{i=1}^{n} [x_{i}^{\beta-1} e^{-\alpha x_{i}^{\beta}}] \]This function is essential for parameter estimation, as it guides us toward understanding how the parameters \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) interact with and affect the probability of our actual data.
Log-Likelihood
The log-likelihood function is a transformed version of the likelihood function that uses natural logarithms to simplify the mathematical manipulation. Instead of multiplying probabilities, which can result in very small numbers, working with sums is computationally more stable and manageable.For the Weibull distribution, the log-likelihood function \( l(\alpha, \beta; x) \) can be expressed as:\[ l(\alpha, \beta; x) = n \ln\alpha + n \ln\beta + (\beta - 1)\sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i} - \alpha \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\beta} \]These transformations help when we approach parameter estimation, specifically finding Maximum Likelihood Estimators (MLEs). By converting the problem to simpler addition operations rather than complex multiplications, we can more easily derive the necessary partial derivatives and equations.
Parameter Estimation
Parameter estimation involves determining the parameters \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) that maximize the likelihood function, thus making the observed data most probable. This process is commonly achieved through Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE).The MLE approach requires solving the equations derived by setting the partial derivatives of the log-likelihood with respect to \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) to zero. For the Weibull distribution, this results in:
  • \( \frac{n}{\alpha} - \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\beta} = 0 \)
  • \( \frac{n}{\beta} + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ln x_{i} - \alpha \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}^{\beta} \ln x_{i} = 0 \)
These equations are usually complex and not solvable through simple algebraic methods. As a result, numerical methods, such as the Newton-Raphson method, are often employed to find accurate estimations of these parameters. This estimation is crucial in fields like survival analysis and risk management, where predicting time-to-failure or similar metrics is important.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many cardiac patients wear implanted pacemakers to control their heartbeat. A plastic connector module mounts on the top of the pacemaker. Assuming a standard deviation of 0.0015 and an approximate normal distribution, find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean of all connector modules made by a certain manufacturing company. A random sample of 75 modules has an average of 0.310 inch.

A clinical trial is conducted to determine if a certain type of inoculation has an effect on the incidence of a certain disease. A sample of 1000 rats was kept in a controlled environment for a period of 1 year and 500 of the rats were given the inoculation. Of the group not given the drug, there were 120 incidences of the disease, while 98 of the inoculated group contracted it. If we call \(p_{1}\) the probability of incidence of the disease in uninoculated rats and \(p_{2}\) the probability of incidence after receiving the drug, compute a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\).

(a) According to a report in the Roanoke Times \& World-News, approximately \(2 / 3\) of the 1600 adults polled by telephone said they think the space shuttle program is a good investment for the country. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of American adults who think the space shuttle program is a good investment for the country. (b) What can we assert with \(95 \%\) confidence about the possible size of our error if we estimate the proportion of American adults who think the space shuttle program is a good investment to be \(2 / 3 ?\)

A machine is used to fill boxes of product in an assembly line operation. Much concern centers around the variability in the number of ounces of product in the box. The standard deviation in weight of product is known to be 0.3 ounces. An improvement is implemented after which a random sample of 20 boxes are selected and the sample variance is found to be 0.045 ounces. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the variance in the weight of the product. Does it appear from the range of the confidence interval that the improvement of the process enhanced quality as far as variability is concerned? Assume normality on the distribution of weight of product.

A random sample of 10 chocolate energy bars of a certain brand has, on average, 230 calories with a standard deviation of 15 calories. Construct a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the true mean calorie content of this brand of energy bar. Assume that the distribution of the calories is approximately normal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.