/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 In the publication Relief from A... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In the publication Relief from Arthritis by Thorsons Publishers L.td. John E Croft claims that over \(40 \%\) of the sufferers from osteoarthritis received measurable relief from an ingredient produced by a particular species of mussel found off the eoust of New Zealand. To test this claim, the mussel extract is to be given to a group of 7 osteonrthritic patients. If or more of the patients roccive relief, we shall not re-ject the null hypothesis that \(p=0.4\); otherwise, we conclude that \(p<0.4\) (a) Evaluate a, assuming that \(p=0.4\). (b) Evaluate \(\beta\) for the alternative \(p=0.3\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Assuming that \(p = 0.4\) would allow for the calculation of the Type I error 'a'. Similarly, assuming the alternative hypothesis \(p = 0.3\) helps to evaluate the Type II error '\(\beta\)'. These errors provide critical insights when deciding on a hypothesis in a statistical testing context.

Step by step solution

01

Setup the problem

Firstly, denote 'a' as the probability of a Type I error, which is the error of rejecting a true null hypothesis. Then, denote '\(\beta\)' as the probability of a Type II error, which is the error of failing to reject a false null hypothesis. Given that the mussel extract would be given to 7 patients, and it would be assumed the null hypothesis is true if 4 or more patients receive relief, therefore \(p = 0.4\). In this case, we are given to evaluate 'a' assuming \(p = 0.4\) and '\(\beta\)' for the alternative \(p = 0.3\).
02

Calculate 'a' (Probability of Type I error)

The given exercise indicates we would reject the null hypothesis when less than 4 patients out of 7 receive relief. This means we would mistakenly accept the null hypothesis (Type I error) when 4 or more patients receive relief. This situation can be represented by the formula for binomial probability:\[ P(X \geq 4) = P(X=4) + P(X=5) + P(X=6) + P(X=7) \]where \(X\) is the random variable representing the number of patients who receive relief, which follows a binomial distribution with parameters \(n = 7\) (number of trials) and \(p = 0.4\) (success probability). Now, apply the formula for binomial probability to each term of the above equation,
03

Calculate '\(\beta\)' (Probability of Type II error)

Now we will calculate '\(\beta\)', the probability of a Type II error, which occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. This means we should have rejected the null hypothesis, but we did not. If the true probability \(p\) is less than 0.4, say 0.3, then we wrongly fail to reject the null hypothesis when 4 or more patients receive relief. This situation can be represented by the same formula mentioned in step 2, where now \(p = 0.3\). Use the formula for binomial probability to compute the terms of the equation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binomial Distribution
The binomial distribution is a probability distribution that summarizes the likelihood that a variable will take one of two independent values under a given set of parameters. In our exercise, it models the number of patients experiencing relief from osteoarthritis after receiving a mussel extract.
Here, the number of trials is 7, corresponding to the 7 patients, and the probability of success is assumed to be 0.4, meaning there's a 40% chance a patient experiences relief.
The formula to calculate the probability of getting exactly k successes in n trials is \[ P(X = k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1-p)^{n-k} \] where \( \binom{n}{k} \) is the binomial coefficient. For the exercise, various probabilities such as \(P(X = 4)\) need to be computed.
Type I Error
A Type I error occurs when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. In the context of hypothesis testing, it's akin to a false positive.
In our example, this would mean concluding the mussel extract does not meet the claimed 40% relief rate when it actually does, due to random variance in testing.
In statistical terms, this is represented by the probability \( \alpha \), which is calculated as the likelihood of getting 4 or more patients (out of 7) experiencing relief when the true success rate is 0.4.
This essentially involves summing up the probabilities of getting 4, 5, 6, or 7 successful outcomes using the binomial formula with \( p = 0.4 \).
Type II Error
Type II error happens when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. This can be seen as a false negative.
For the mussel extract test, a Type II error would occur if we accepted that the mussel extract has at least a 40% relief rate when the true rate is actually lower, like 30%.
The probability of a Type II error, denoted by \( \beta \), is calculated as the chance of getting a misleading result (4 or more patients feeling relief) when the actual probability is lower (\( p = 0.3 \)).
This involves using the binomial distribution with the alternative hypothesis success rate, and summing the probabilities of 4 to 7 successes.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement we assume to be true until evidence suggests otherwise. It's the starting point for any hypothesis test.
In the arthritis relief example, the null hypothesis posits that at least 40% of patients will experience relief from the mussel extract, symbolically written as \( p = 0.4 \).
The analysis involves testing this claim by observing the outcomes from 7 patients. If fewer than 4 out of the 7 patients report relief, we might suspect that the true relief rate is lower, prompting a potential rejection of this null hypothesis.
The process requires calculating the Type I and Type II errors to understand the likelihood of making incorrect decisions about this hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In an experiment to study the dependence of hypertension on smoking habits, the following data were taken on 180 individuals Test the hypothesis that the presence or absence of hy pertension is independent of smoking habits. Use 0.05 level of significance.

Past expericnce indicates that the time required for high school seniors to complete a standardized test is a normal random variable with a standard deviation of 6 minutes. Test the hypothesis that \(0=0\) against the alternative that \(1 \mathrm{~T}<6\) if a random sample of 20 high school seniors has a standard deviations \(s=4.51 .\) Use a 0.05 level of significance.

An electrical fim manufactures light bulbs that have a lifetime that is approximately normally distributed with a mean of 800 hours and a standard deviation of 40 hours. Test the hypothesis that \(p=800\) hours against the alternative \(p \neq 800\) hours if a random sample of 30 bulbs has an average life of 788 hours. Use a P-value in your answers.

10.17 A new cure has been developed for a certain type of cement that results in a compressive strength of 5000 kilograms per square centimeter and a standard deviation of 120 . To test the hypothesis that \(\mu=5000\) against the alternative that \(p<5000\), a random sample of 50 pieces of cement is tested. The critical region is defined to be \(x<4970\). (a) Find the probability of committing a type I error when \(H n\) is true (b) Evaluate 0 for the alternatives \(p=4970\) and \(p=1960\)

A geneticist is interested in the proportion of males and females in a population that have a certain minor blood disorder. In a random sample of 100 males, 31 are found to be aftlicted, whereas only 24 of 100 females tested appear to have the disorder. Can we conclude at the 0.01 level of significance that the proportion of men in the population afflicted with this blood disorder is significantly greater than the proportion of women afflicted?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.