/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 The following summary statistics... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following summary statistics were obtained from study that used regression analysis to investigate the relationship between pavement deflection and surface temperature of the pavement at various locations on a state highway. Here \(x=\) temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right)\) and \(y=\) deflection adjustment factor \((y \geq 0)\) : $$ \begin{aligned} &n=15 \quad \sum x_{i}=1425 \quad \sum y_{i}=10.68 \\ &\sum x_{i}^{2}=139,037.25 \quad \sum x_{i} y_{i}=987.645 \\ &\sum y_{i}^{2}=7.8518 \end{aligned} $$ (Many more than 15 observations were made in the study; the reference is "Flexible Pavement Evaluation and Rehabilitation," Transportation Eng. J., 1977: 75-85.) a. Compute \(\hat{\beta}_{1}, \hat{\beta}_{0}\), and the equation of the estimated regression line. Graph the estimated line. b. What is the estimate of expected change in the deflection adjustment factor when temperature is increased by \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ? c. Suppose temperature were measured in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) rather than in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). What would be the estimated regression line? Answer part (b) for an increase of \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). [Hint: \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}=(9 / 5)^{\circ} \mathrm{C}+32\); now substitute for the "old \(x\) " in terms of the "new \(x\)."] d. If a \(200^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) surface temperature were within the realm of possibility, would you use the estimated line of part (a) to predict deflection factor for this temperature? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The regression equation is \( \hat{y} = 0.023 + 0.00723x \); change in factor per 1°F is 0.00723. In Celsius: \( \hat{y} = 0.25436 + 0.013014x_C \); change per 1°C is 0.013014. 200°F likely lies outside data range.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Slope (β1)

To find the slope of the regression line, we use the formula: \[ \hat{\beta}_1 = \frac{n \sum x_iy_i - (\sum x_i)(\sum y_i)}{n \sum x_i^2 - (\sum x_i)^2} \]Substitute the given values: \[ \hat{\beta}_1 = \frac{15 \cdot 987.645 - (1425)(10.68)}{15 \cdot 139037.25 - (1425)^2} \]Calculate this to find:\[ \hat{\beta}_1 \approx 0.00723 \]
02

Calculate the Intercept (β0)

To find the intercept, use the formula:\[ \hat{\beta}_0 = \bar{y} - \hat{\beta}_1 \bar{x} \]First, calculate the means \( \bar{x} \) and \( \bar{y} \):\[ \bar{x} = \frac{\sum x_i}{n} = \frac{1425}{15} = 95 \]\[ \bar{y} = \frac{\sum y_i}{n} = \frac{10.68}{15} \approx 0.712 \]Now calculate the intercept:\[ \hat{\beta}_0 = 0.712 - 0.00723 \times 95 \]\[ \hat{\beta}_0 \approx 0.023 \]
03

Form the Regression Line

With \( \hat{\beta}_0 = 0.023 \) and \( \hat{\beta}_1 = 0.00723 \), the estimated regression line equation is:\[ \hat{y} = 0.023 + 0.00723x \]
04

Graph the Regression Line

To graph the regression line \( \hat{y} = 0.023 + 0.00723x \), plot the line over a range of \( x \) values. This line represents the relationship between temperature in Fahrenheit and the deflection adjustment factor.
05

Calculate the Change in Deflection Factor for 1°F

The slope \( \hat{\beta}_1 = 0.00723 \) represents the expected change in the deflection adjustment factor for a 1°F increase in temperature: So, for an increase of 1°F, the deflection adjustment factor increases by approximately 0.00723.
06

Convert the Equation to Celsius

First, convert the temperature from °F to °C using the formula :\[ ^\circ F = \frac{9}{5} \times {^\circ C} + 32 \]Substitute this into the regression equation:\[ \hat{y} = 0.023 + 0.00723 \left( \frac{9}{5}x + 32 \right) \]Simplify to get:\[ \hat{y} = 0.023 + 0.013014x_C + 0.23136 \]Thus, when calculating the relationship with Celsius, the equation becomes: \[ \hat{y} = 0.25436 + 0.013014x_C \]
07

Calculate Change in Deflection Factor for 1°C

With temperature in Celsius, \( \hat{\beta}_1 = 0.013014 \) explains the change in the deflection adjustment factor for a 1°C increase:For an increase of 1°C, the deflection adjustment factor increases by approximately 0.013014.
08

Consider Using the Regression Line at 200°F

To decide whether you can use the estimated regression line for a temperature of 200°F, consider the range of data used to estimate the line. If 200°F lies outside the observed data range (based on mean \( \bar{x} = 95 \) and assumed max/min values), the linear relationship may not hold.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pavement Deflection
Pavement deflection refers to the bending or flexing of the pavement surface when subjected to loads such as vehicles. This can be an important measure for engineers to assess the health and durability of a road. When the pavement supports a load, it experiences internal stress. If a pavement deflects too much, it indicates that it may not withstand further usage, which could lead to cracks or deeper damage.
Understanding pavement deflection is crucial for road maintenance and planning. It helps in predicting the lifespan of the pavement and making decisions about necessary interventions. In this context, it is important to determine how factors like temperature affect deflection, which is why regression analysis is employed.
Surface Temperature
Surface temperature of the pavement can greatly influence its physical properties, including its deflection under loads. Pavement surface temperature can vary based on several factors like ambient temperature, sunlight intensity, and the material composition of the pavement.
For example, a higher surface temperature can make the bituminous surface layer softer, increasing deflection. More deflection at higher temperatures suggests that the temperature might be a critical factor in pavement behavior. By examining the relationship between surface temperature and deflection, we can improve the design and maintenance strategies to mitigate potential damage.
Linear Regression
Linear regression is a statistical method used to model the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. In the context of the given exercise, it involves understanding how pavement deflection (dependent variable) changes with surface temperature (independent variable).
The technique involves finding a line of best fit through a set of data points. This line is represented by an equation, \[ \hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x \], where \( \hat{\beta}_0 \) is the intercept and \( \hat{\beta}_1 \) is the slope. In this scenario, linear regression helps determine how pavement deflection changes as temperature increases, allowing for predictions and analysis based on observed data.
Slope and Intercept Calculations
To calculate the regression line's slope \( \hat{\beta}_1 \), we analyze how much the dependent variable, deflection, changes for each unit change in the surface temperature. This is achieved using\[ \hat{\beta}_1 = \frac{n \sum x_iy_i - (\sum x_i)(\sum y_i)}{n \sum x_i^2 - (\sum x_i)^2} \]. This formula ensures a precise calculation of the slope, depicting the effect temperature has on deflection.
The intercept \( \hat{\beta}_0 \) is found using:\[ \hat{\beta}_0 = \bar{y} - \hat{\beta}_1 \bar{x} \], which indicates the value of deflection when the temperature is zero.
These calculations result in the best-fit line, essential for making predictions about deflection at varying temperatures.
Temperature Conversion
In scientific studies like this one, temperature might be recorded in either Fahrenheit or Celsius. However, these two units can be converted using the formula.: \[ ^\circ F = \frac{9}{5} \times {^\circ C} + 32 \]
When working with regression analysis, you might need to convert temperature units to maintain consistency, particularly when given data in different units. In this exercise, converting temperature from Fahrenheit to Celsius significantly affects the regression equation and understanding how temperature influences deflection.
It's essential to comprehend temperature conversion as it allows better global understanding and comparability in different scientific studies, making results more versatile and widely applicable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The probability of a type II error for the \(t\) test for \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\) \(\beta_{10}\) can be computed in the same manner as it was computed for the \(t\) tests of Chapter 8 . If the alternative value of \(\beta_{1}\) is denoted by \(\beta_{1}^{\prime}\), the value of $$ d=\frac{\left|\beta_{10}-\beta_{1}^{\prime}\right|}{\sigma \sqrt{\frac{n-1}{\sum x_{i}^{2}-\left(\sum x_{i}\right)^{2} / n}}} $$ is first calculated, then the appropriate set of curves in Appendix Table A.17 is entered on the horizontal axis at the value of \(d\), and \(\beta\) is read from the curve for \(n-2 \mathrm{df}\). An article in the Journal of Public Health Engineering reports the results of a regression analysis based on \(n=15\) observations in which \(x=\) filter application temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) and \(y=\%\) efficiency of BOD removal. Calculated quantities include \(\sum x_{i}=402, \sum x_{i}^{2}=11,098, s=3.725\), and \(\hat{\beta}_{1}=1.7035\). Consider testing at level .01 \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=1\), which states that the expected increase in \(\%\) BOD removal is 1 when filter application temperature increases by \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), against the alternative \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \beta_{1}>1\). Determine \(\mathrm{P}\) (type II error) when \(\beta_{1}^{\prime}=2, \sigma=4\).

The article "Characterization of Highway Runoff in Austin, Texas, Area" (J. of Envir: Engr., 1998: 131-137) gave a scatter plot, along with the least squares line, of \(x=\) rainfall volume \(\left(\mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) and \(y=\) runoff volume \(\left(\mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) for a particular location. The accompanying values were read from the plot. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{l|llllllll} x & 5 & 12 & 14 & 17 & 23 & 30 & 40 & 47 \\ \hline y & 4 & 10 & 13 & 15 & 15 & 25 & 27 & 46 \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{l|lllllll} x & 55 & 67 & 72 & 81 & 96 & 112 & 127 \\ \hline y & 38 & 46 & 53 & 70 & 82 & 99 & 100 \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ a. Does a scatter plot of the data support the use of the simple linear regression model? b. Calculate point estimates of the slope and intercept of the population regression line. c. Calculate a point estimate of the true average runoff volume when rainfall volume is 50 . d. Calculate a point estimate of the standard deviation \(\sigma\). e. What proportion of the observed variation in runoff volume can be attributed to the simple linear regression relationship between runoff and rainfall?

The article "Objective Measurement of the Stretchability of Mozzarella Cheese" (J. of Texture Studies, 1992: 185-194) reported on an experiment to investigate how the behavior of mozzarella cheese varied with temperature. Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) temperature and \(y=\) elongation \((\%)\) at failure of the cheese. [Note: The researchers were Italian and used real mozzarella cheese, not the poor cousin widely available in the United States.] $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 59 & 63 & 68 & 72 & 74 & 78 & 83 \\ \hline y & 118 & 182 & 247 & 208 & 197 & 135 & 132 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((0,0)\). Mark \(0,20,40,60,80\), and 100 on the horizontal axis and \(0,50,100,150,200\), and 250 on the vertical axis. b. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at ( 55 , 100 ), as was done in the cited article. Does this plot seem preferable to the one in part (a)? Explain your reasoning. c. What do the plots of parts (a) and (b) suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables?

A sample of \(n=500(x, y)\) pairs was collected and a test of \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \rho \neq 0\) was carried out. The resulting \(P\)-value was computed to be \(.00032\). a. What conclusion would be appropriate at level of significance .001? b. Does this small \(P\)-value indicate that there is a very strong linear relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) (a value of \(\rho\) that differs considerably from 0)? Explain. c. Now suppose a sample of \(n=10,000(x, y)\) pairs resulted in \(r=.022\). Test \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \rho \neq 0\) at level \(.05\). Is the result statistically significant? Comment on the practical significance of your analysis.

The Turbine Oil Oxidation Test (TOST) and the Rotating Bomb Oxidation Test (RBOT) are two different procedures for evaluating the oxidation stability of steam turbine oils. The article "Dependence of Oxidation Stability of Steam Turbine Oil on Base Oil Composition" (J. of the Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engrs., Oct. 1997: 19-24) reported the accompanying observations on \(x=\) TOST time (hr) and \(y=\) RBOT time (min) for 12 oil specimens. $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrr} \text { TOST } & 4200 & 3600 & 3750 & 3675 & 4050 & 2770 \\ \text { RBOT } & 370 & 340 & 375 & 310 & 350 & 200 \\ \text { TOST } & 4870 & 4500 & 3450 & 2700 & 3750 & 3300 \\ \text { RBOT } & 400 & 375 & 285 & 225 & 345 & 285 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate and interpret the value of the sample correlation coefficient (as did the article's authors). b. How would the value of \(r\) be affected if we had let \(x=\) RBOT time and \(y=\) TOST time? c. How would the value of \(r\) be affected if RBOT time were expressed in hours? d. Construct normal probability plots and comment. e. Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether RBOT time and TOST time are linearly related.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.