/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 The article "Objective Measureme... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Objective Measurement of the Stretchability of Mozzarella Cheese" (J. of Texture Studies, 1992: 185-194) reported on an experiment to investigate how the behavior of mozzarella cheese varied with temperature. Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) temperature and \(y=\) elongation \((\%)\) at failure of the cheese. [Note: The researchers were Italian and used real mozzarella cheese, not the poor cousin widely available in the United States.] $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrr} x & 59 & 63 & 68 & 72 & 74 & 78 & 83 \\ \hline y & 118 & 182 & 247 & 208 & 197 & 135 & 132 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at \((0,0)\). Mark \(0,20,40,60,80\), and 100 on the horizontal axis and \(0,50,100,150,200\), and 250 on the vertical axis. b. Construct a scatter plot in which the axes intersect at ( 55 , 100 ), as was done in the cited article. Does this plot seem preferable to the one in part (a)? Explain your reasoning. c. What do the plots of parts (a) and (b) suggest about the nature of the relationship between the two variables?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The scatter plot with axes at (55, 100) may better reveal trends, and data suggests a peak in elongation around 63-68 degrees.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Data

The data consists of temperature values \(x\) and corresponding elongation percentages \(y\) for mozzarella cheese. These values are pairs like (59, 118), (63, 182), etc. Our goal is to graph these points on a scatter plot with two different scales.
02

Constructing Scatter Plot (Axes at (0,0))

Create a Cartesian plane with the x-axis ranging from 0 to 100 and the y-axis ranging from 0 to 250. Plot each data point as a dot where the temperature corresponds to the x-value and the elongation percentage to the y-value. Points will be plotted at (59, 118), (63, 182), etc.
03

Constructing Scatter Plot (Axes at (55,100))

Adjust the graph so the origin begins at (55, 100) instead of (0, 0). This re-centers the plot around the mean of both x and y values, providing a potentially clearer view of changes and trends in the data. Re-plot the same points, but with axes shifted.
04

Comparing Scatter Plots

Examine both scatter plots. The plot with axes starting at (0, 0) highlights all data in the standard scale, while the one starting at (55, 100) might better reveal trends by centering around the middle range of data. The second plot may be preferable if it allows easier visualization of the trend without excessive empty space.
05

Analyzing the Relationship

Both plots should show a trend. From the data points, there appears to be a peak in elongation around 63-68 degrees, suggesting that elongation initially increases with temperature, peaks, and then declines as temperature continues to increase.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Plot
A scatter plot is a type of graph used to display the relationship between two quantitative variables. Each point on the scatter plot represents an observation from the data set.
For this exercise, we are dealing with temperature and elongation values of mozzarella cheese.
  • Each dot on the scatter plot corresponds to a specific pairing of temperature and elongation percentage.
  • By plotting temperature on the x-axis and elongation on the y-axis, we can observe potential correlations visually.
Creating a scatter plot helps us understand if higher temperatures lead to higher elongation or vice versa. It provides a first look at how temperature impacts the cheese's stretchability.
Data Visualization
Data visualization is crucial for understanding complex data sets at a glance. By graphically representing data, we can identify patterns, trends, and outliers quickly.
In our example of mozzarella cheese, visualizing temperature and elongation can help identify key trends that may not be obvious from raw numbers alone.
  • Scatter plots are a fundamental tool in data visualization, making relationships between variables visible.
  • They assist in identifying whether variables move together, which can be challenging to ascertain from tabular data alone.
Moving axes from typical origins, like adjusting the axes to (55, 100) in our exercise, can enhance clarity and focus on the most critical part of the data.
Temperature vs. Elongation
Examining the relationship between temperature and elongation is central to this analysis. In the given data set, we're investigating how the stretchability of mozzarella cheese changes with temperature.
From our analysis:
  • Elongation appears to increase initially with rising temperatures, peaking between 63-68 degrees.
  • Beyond this peak, elongation starts to decline.
This suggests a non-linear relationship between temperature and elongation, where the cheese reacts differently at varying temperatures. Such insights could be pivotal for industries focused on cheese production, helping ensure optimal conditions for desired cheese quality.
Trend Analysis
Trend analysis involves examining patterns within the data to predict future outcomes. In the context of regression analysis, we're trying to understand the relationship between the variables over time or conditions.
For mozzarella cheese:
  • The trend we observe is a rise and fall in elongation as temperature changes, suggesting an optimal stretchability range.
  • By identifying this peak, producers can aim for the best conditions when processing or cooking cheese.
Understanding this trend helps in both practical applications in the kitchen and scientific research, aiding better control over the cheese production process.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying data on \(x=\) current density \(\left(\mathrm{mA} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\) and \(y=\) rate of deposition \((\mu \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{min})\) appeared in the article "Plating of \(60 / 40\) Tin/Lead Solder for Head Termination Metallurgy" (Plating and Surface Finishing, Jan. 1997: \(38-40\) ). Do you agree with the claim by the article's author that "a linear relationship was obtained from the tin-lead rate of deposition as a function of current density"? Explain your reasoning. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} x & 20 & 40 & 60 & 80 \\ \hline y & .24 & 1.20 & 1.71 & 2.22 \end{array} $$

The article "Chronological Trend in Blood Lead Levels" (N. Engl. J. Med., 1983: 1373-1377) gives the following data on \(y=\) average blood lead level of white children age 6 months to 5 years and \(x=\) amount of lead used in gasoline production (in 1000 tons) for ten 6-month periods: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccc} x & 48 & 59 & 79 & 80 & 95 \\ \hline y & 9.3 & 11.0 & 12.8 & 14.1 & 13.6 \\ x & 95 & 97 & 102 & 102 & 107 \\ \hline y & 13.8 & 14.6 & 14.6 & 16.0 & 18.2 \end{array} $$ a. Construct separate normal probability plots for \(x\) and \(y\). Do you think it is reasonable to assume that the \((x, y)\) pairs are from a bivariate normal population? b. Does the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear relationship between blood lead level and the amount of lead used in gasoline production? Use \(\alpha=.01\).

How does lateral acceleration-side forces experienced in turns that are largely under driver control-affect nausea as perceived by bus passengers? The article "Motion Sickness in Public Road Transport: The Effect of Driver, Route, and Vehicle" (Ergonomics, 1999: 1646-1664) reported data on \(x=\) motion sickness dose (calculated in accordance with a British standard for evaluating similar motion at sea) and \(y=\) reported nausea (\%). Relevant summary quantities are \(n=17, \sum x_{i}=222.1, \sum y_{i}=193, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3056.69\), \(\sum x_{i} y_{i}=2759.6, \sum y_{i}^{2}=2975\) Values of dose in the sample ranged from \(6.0\) to 17.6. a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid for relating these two variables (this is supported by the raw data), calculate and interpret an estimate of the slope parameter that conveys information about the precision and reliability of estimation. b. Does it appear that there is a useful linear relationship between these two variables? Answer the question by employing the \(P\)-value approach. c. Would it be sensible to use the simple linear regression model as a basis for predicting \% nausea when dose \(=\) \(5.0\) ? Explain your reasoning. d. When MINITAB was used to fit the simple linear regression model to the raw data, the observation \((6.0,2.50)\) was flagged as possibly having a substantial impact on the fit. Eliminate this observation from the sample and recalculate the estimate of part (a). Based on this, does the observation appear to be exerting an undue influence?

"Mode-mixity" refers to how much of crack propagation is attributable to the three conventional fracture modes of opening, sliding, and tearing. For plane problems, only the first two modes are present, and the mode-mixity angle is a measure of the extent to which propagation is due to sliding as opposed to opening. The article "Increasing Allowable Flight Loads by Improved Structural Modeling" (AIAA J., 2006: 376-381) gave the following data on \(x=\) mode-mixity angle (degrees) and \(y=\) fracture toughness \((\mathrm{N} / \mathrm{m})\) for sandwich panels use in aircraft construction. $$ \begin{array}{l|llllllll} x & 16.52 & 17.53 & 18.05 & 18.50 & 22.39 & 23.89 & 25.50 & 24.89 \\ \hline y & 609.4 & 443.1 & 577.9 & 628.7 & 565.7 & 711.0 & 863.4 & 956.2 \\ x & 23.48 & 24.98 & 25.55 & 25.90 & 22.65 & 23.69 & 24.15 & 24.54 \\ \hline y & 679.5 & 707.5 & 767.1 & 817.8 & 702.3 & 903.7 & 964.9 & 1047.3 \end{array} $$ a. Obtain the equation of the estimated regression line, and discuss the extent to which the simple linear regression model is a reasonable way to relate fracture toughness to mode-mixity angle. b. Does the data suggest that the average change in fracture toughness associated with a one-degree increase in mode-mixity angle exceeds \(50 \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{m}\) ? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses. c. For purposes of precisely estimating the slope of the population regression line, would it have been preferable to make observations at the angles \(16,16,18,18,20,20\), \(20,20,22,22,22,22,24,24,26\), and 26 (again a sample size of 16)? Explain your reasoning. d. Calculate an estimate of true average fracture toughness and also a prediction of fracture toughness both for an angle of 18 degrees and for an angle of 22 degrees, and do so in a manner that conveys information about reliability and precision, and then interpret and compare the estimates and predictions.

The article "The Incorporation of Uranium and Silver by Hydrothermally Synthesized Galena" (Econ. Geology, 1964: 1003-1024) reports on the determination of silver content of galena crystals grown in a closed hydrothermal system over a range of temperature. With \(x=\) crystallization temperature in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(y=\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{~S}\) in mol\%, the data follows: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccccccc} x & 398 & 292 & 352 & 575 & 568 & 450 & 550 & 408 & 484 & 350 & 503 & 600 & 600 \\ \hline y & .15 & .05 & .23 & .43 & .23 & .40 & .44 & .44 & .45 & .09 & .59 & .63 & .60 \end{array} $$ from which \(\sum x_{i}=6130, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3,022,050, \sum y_{i}=4.73\), \(\sum y_{i}^{2}=2.1785, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=2418.74, \hat{\beta}_{1}=.00143, \hat{\beta}_{0}=-.311\), and \(s=.131\). a. Estimate true average silver content when temperature is \(500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. b. How would the width of a \(95 \%\) CI for true average silver content when temperature is \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) compare to the width of the interval in part (a)? Answer without computing this new interval. c. Calculate a \(95 \%\) CI for the true average change in silver content associated with a \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) increase in temperature. d. Suppose it had previously been believed that when crystallization temperature was \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), true average silver content would be .25. Carry out a test at significance level .05 to decide whether the sample data contradicts this prior belief.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.