/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 The article "The Incorporation o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "The Incorporation of Uranium and Silver by Hydrothermally Synthesized Galena" (Econ. Geology, 1964: 1003-1024) reports on the determination of silver content of galena crystals grown in a closed hydrothermal system over a range of temperature. With \(x=\) crystallization temperature in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(y=\mathrm{Ag}_{2} \mathrm{~S}\) in mol\%, the data follows: $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccccccc} x & 398 & 292 & 352 & 575 & 568 & 450 & 550 & 408 & 484 & 350 & 503 & 600 & 600 \\ \hline y & .15 & .05 & .23 & .43 & .23 & .40 & .44 & .44 & .45 & .09 & .59 & .63 & .60 \end{array} $$ from which \(\sum x_{i}=6130, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3,022,050, \sum y_{i}=4.73\), \(\sum y_{i}^{2}=2.1785, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=2418.74, \hat{\beta}_{1}=.00143, \hat{\beta}_{0}=-.311\), and \(s=.131\). a. Estimate true average silver content when temperature is \(500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. b. How would the width of a \(95 \%\) CI for true average silver content when temperature is \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) compare to the width of the interval in part (a)? Answer without computing this new interval. c. Calculate a \(95 \%\) CI for the true average change in silver content associated with a \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) increase in temperature. d. Suppose it had previously been believed that when crystallization temperature was \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), true average silver content would be .25. Carry out a test at significance level .05 to decide whether the sample data contradicts this prior belief.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Estimate is 0.354 with CI calculated. b. 400°C CI will be narrower. c. CI for \( \hat{\beta}_1 \) calculated. d. Conduct t-test for belief.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Linear Regression Equation

The given data can be analyzed using a simple linear regression model: \[ y = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1 x \] where \( y \) is the silver content, \( x \) is the temperature, \( \hat{\beta}_0 = -0.311 \) is the intercept, and \( \hat{\beta}_1 = 0.00143 \) is the slope of the regression line.
02

Estimate True Average Silver Content at 500°C

To estimate the true average silver content at \( x = 500 \), substitute this value into the regression equation:\[ \hat{y} = -0.311 + 0.00143 \times 500 = 0.354 \]Calculate the estimated true average and then construct a 95% confidence interval around it. The formula for the CI is:\[ \hat{y} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-2} \times s \sqrt{\frac{1}{n} + \frac{(x - \bar{x})^2}{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}} \]Where \( s = 0.131 \), \( n \) is the number of samples, and \( \bar{x} = \frac{\sum x_i}{n} \). Use the given \( \sum x_i = 6130 \) and \( n = 13 \) to find \( \bar{x} \) and apply to the formula.
03

Compare Widths of 95% CIs at 400°C and 500°C

While absolute computations aren't necessary, the width of the confidence interval depends on the term \( \frac{(x - \bar{x})^2}{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2} \). A temperature of 400°C is closer to the average temperature \( \bar{x} \) than 500°C, leading to a smaller numerator and thus a narrower confidence interval.
04

Calculate 95% CI for True Average Change per °C

The slope \( \hat{\beta}_1 = 0.00143 \) represents the average change in \( y \) per 1°C change in \( x \). To create a 95% confidence interval for \( \hat{\beta}_1 \), use:\[ \hat{\beta}_1 \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-2} \times se(\hat{\beta}_1) \]where \( se(\hat{\beta}_1) = \frac{s}{\sqrt{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}} \).Substitute the given values and \( \alpha = 0.05 \).
05

Hypothesis Test for Belief at 400°C

Conduct a hypothesis test for the prior belief \( H_0: \mu_y = 0.25 \) at 400°C. Calculate the test statistic:\[ t = \frac{\hat{y} - 0.25}{se(\hat{y})} \]where \( \hat{y} = -0.311 + 0.00143 \times 400 \). Use a two-tailed t-test with critical values from a t-distribution for \( n-2 \) degrees of freedom. Reject \( H_0 \) if the statistic falls outside the critical t-values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
Confidence intervals are vital for estimating the range within which a true parameter value lies, based on sample data. When we talk about the confidence interval for the average silver content in galena crystals at a certain temperature, we refer to the range we expect the true average value to fall into, with 95% certainty.

The formula for calculating a confidence interval in linear regression involves several components: the estimated coefficient (\(\hat{y}\)), the standard deviation of residuals (\(s\)), and the distribution of the sample means around their average (\(\bar{x}\)). The formula is given by:
  • \(\hat{y} \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-2} \times s \sqrt{\frac{1}{n} + \frac{(x - \bar{x})^2}{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}}\)
This formula considers the variability in our estimates and accounts for the spread of the data.

A narrower confidence interval indicates a more precise estimate, while a wider interval reflects greater uncertainty. For instance, in the original problem, the confidence interval is wider at 500°C than at 400°C because 400°C is closer to the mean crystallization temperature. Thus, confidence intervals help us understand the precision of our estimates and compare different scenarios.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a method used to make inferences about population parameters based on sample statistics. In the context of linear regression, we often test hypotheses about the regression coefficients or about predicted values at specific values of the independent variable.

For instance, if there is a prior belief that the average silver content at 400°C is 0.25, a hypothesis test can help determine whether the data supports or contradicts this belief. We set up a null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) that reflects the prior belief: \(\mu_y = 0.25\), and an alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) that suggests a different value. A t-test statistic is then calculated to evaluate the hypothesis:
  • \(t = \frac{\hat{y} - 0.25}{se(\hat{y})}\)
where \(\hat{y}\) is the predicted value at 400°C, and \(se(\hat{y})\) is the standard error of the predicted value.
Decisions are made based on the t-statistic: if it falls outside a critical range (determined by the significance level \(\alpha\)), the null hypothesis is rejected, suggesting evidence for the alternative hypothesis. This process helps in verifying or challenging established beliefs with statistical evidence.
Regression Slope
The regression slope (\(\hat{\beta}_1\)) in a linear model tells us how much the dependent variable (\(y\)) is expected to change for a one-unit increase in the independent variable (\(x\)). It quantifies the relationship between variables, indicating the strength and direction of their linear association.

In the provided problem, the slope of the regression line is 0.00143, suggesting that for each 1°C increase in temperature, the silver content increases by 0.00143 mol%. To evaluate the accuracy of this slope, a confidence interval is calculated:
  • \(\hat{\beta}_1 \pm t_{\alpha/2, n-2} \times se(\hat{\beta}_1)\)
Here, \(se(\hat{\beta}_1)\) is the standard error, which accounts for the variability of \(\hat{\beta}_1\).
Understanding the regression slope is crucial because it offers insights into how the response variable behaves concerning changes in the predictor, confirming or disproving hypotheses about data trends. A significant slope indicates a meaningful relationship, critical for making predictive and interpretative decisions. This guides researchers and practitioners in applying statistical analysis to real-world scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Physical properties of six flame-retardant fabric samples were investigated in the article "Sensory and Physical Properties of Inherently Flame-Retardant Fabrics" (Textile Research, 1984: 61-68). Use the accompanying data and a .05 significance level to determine whether a linear relationship exists between stiffness \(x(\mathrm{mg}-\mathrm{cm})\) and thickness \(y(\mathrm{~mm})\). Is the result of the test surprising in light of the value of \(r\) ? $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} x & 7.98 & 24.52 & 12.47 & 6.92 & 24.11 & 35.71 \\ \hline y & .28 & .65 & .32 & .27 & .81 & .57 \end{array} $$

The article "Some Field Experience in the Use of an Accelerated Method in Estimating 28-Day Strength of Concrete" (J. Amer. Concrete Institute, 1969: 895) considered regressing \(y=28\)-day standard-cured strength (psi) against \(x=\) accelerated strength (psi). Suppose the equation of the true regression line is \(y=1800+1.3 x\). a. What is the expected value of 28-day strength when accelerated strength \(=2500\) ? b. By how much can we expect 28-day strength to change when accelerated strength increases by 1 psi? c. Answer part (b) for an increase of \(100 \mathrm{psi}\). d. Answer part (b) for a decrease of \(100 \mathrm{psi}\).

The accompanying data on \(x=\) current density \(\left(\mathrm{mA} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right)\) and \(y=\) rate of deposition \((\mu \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{min})\) appeared in the article "Plating of \(60 / 40\) Tin/Lead Solder for Head Termination Metallurgy" (Plating and Surface Finishing, Jan. 1997: \(38-40\) ). Do you agree with the claim by the article's author that "a linear relationship was obtained from the tin-lead rate of deposition as a function of current density"? Explain your reasoning. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccc} x & 20 & 40 & 60 & 80 \\ \hline y & .24 & 1.20 & 1.71 & 2.22 \end{array} $$

How does lateral acceleration-side forces experienced in turns that are largely under driver control-affect nausea as perceived by bus passengers? The article "Motion Sickness in Public Road Transport: The Effect of Driver, Route, and Vehicle" (Ergonomics, 1999: 1646-1664) reported data on \(x=\) motion sickness dose (calculated in accordance with a British standard for evaluating similar motion at sea) and \(y=\) reported nausea (\%). Relevant summary quantities are \(n=17, \sum x_{i}=222.1, \sum y_{i}=193, \sum x_{i}^{2}=3056.69\), \(\sum x_{i} y_{i}=2759.6, \sum y_{i}^{2}=2975\) Values of dose in the sample ranged from \(6.0\) to 17.6. a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid for relating these two variables (this is supported by the raw data), calculate and interpret an estimate of the slope parameter that conveys information about the precision and reliability of estimation. b. Does it appear that there is a useful linear relationship between these two variables? Answer the question by employing the \(P\)-value approach. c. Would it be sensible to use the simple linear regression model as a basis for predicting \% nausea when dose \(=\) \(5.0\) ? Explain your reasoning. d. When MINITAB was used to fit the simple linear regression model to the raw data, the observation \((6.0,2.50)\) was flagged as possibly having a substantial impact on the fit. Eliminate this observation from the sample and recalculate the estimate of part (a). Based on this, does the observation appear to be exerting an undue influence?

Plasma etching is essential to the fine-line pattern transfer in current semiconductor processes. The article "Ion Beam-Assisted Etching of Aluminum with Chlorine" (J. Electrochem. Soc., 1985: 2010- 2012) gives the accompanying data (read from a graph) on chlorine flow ( \(x\), in \(\mathrm{SCCM}\) ) through a nozzle used in the etching mechanism and etch rate \((y\), in \(100 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{min})\). $$ \begin{array}{l|ccccccccc} x & 1.5 & 1.5 & 2.0 & 2.5 & 2.5 & 3.0 & 3.5 & 3.5 & 4.0 \\ \hline y & 23.0 & 24.5 & 25.0 & 30.0 & 33.5 & 40.0 & 40.5 & 47.0 & 49.0 \end{array} $$ The summary statistics are \(\sum x_{i}=24.0, \sum y_{i}=312.5, \sum x_{i}^{2}=\) \(70.50, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=902.25, \sum y_{i}^{2}=11,626.75, \quad \hat{\beta}_{0}=6.448718\), \(\hat{\beta}_{1}=10.602564 .\) a. Does the simple linear regression model specify a useful relationship between chlorine flow and etch rate? b. Estimate the true average change in etch rate associated with a 1-SCCM increase in flow rate using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval, and interpret the interval. c. Calculate a \(95 \%\) CI for \(\mu_{Y \cdot 3.0}\), the true average etch rate when flow \(=3.0\). Has this average been precisely estimated? d. Calculate a \(95 \%\) PI for a single future observation on etch rate to be made when flow \(=3.0\). Is the prediction likely to be accurate? e. Would the \(95 \%\) CI and PI when flow \(=2.5\) be wider or narrower than the corresponding intervals of parts (c) and (d)? Answer without actually computing the intervals. f. Would you recommend calculating a \(95 \%\) PI for a flow of \(6.0 ?\) Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.