/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 Physical properties of six flame... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Physical properties of six flame-retardant fabric samples were investigated in the article "Sensory and Physical Properties of Inherently Flame-Retardant Fabrics" (Textile Research, 1984: 61-68). Use the accompanying data and a .05 significance level to determine whether a linear relationship exists between stiffness \(x(\mathrm{mg}-\mathrm{cm})\) and thickness \(y(\mathrm{~mm})\). Is the result of the test surprising in light of the value of \(r\) ? $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} x & 7.98 & 24.52 & 12.47 & 6.92 & 24.11 & 35.71 \\ \hline y & .28 & .65 & .32 & .27 & .81 & .57 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The test suggests no significant linear relationship, which may not be surprising if \( r \) is low.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Pearson Correlation Coefficient

First, calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient \( r \) to measure the linear relationship between stiffness \( x \) and thickness \( y \). The formula for \( r \) is: \[ r = \frac{n(\sum{xy}) - (\sum{x})(\sum{y})}{\sqrt{[n\sum{x^2} - (\sum{x})^2][n\sum{y^2} - (\sum{y})^2]}} \] where \( n \) is the number of samples, in this case, 6.
02

State the Hypotheses for the Correlation Test

Formulate the null hypothesis \( H_0 \) and alternative hypothesis \( H_a \):\( H_0: \rho = 0 \) (there is no linear correlation between stiffness and thickness)\( H_a: \rho eq 0 \) (there is a linear correlation between stiffness and thickness)
03

Determine the Critical Correlation Value

Using a significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \) and \( n = 6 \), refer to the correlation critical value table. For \( n - 2 = 4 \) degrees of freedom, the critical value of \( r \) at \( \alpha = 0.05 \) (two-tailed) is approximately 0.811.
04

Compare Calculated Correlation with Critical Value

Compare the calculated \( r \) from Step 1 with the critical value from Step 3. If \(|r|\) is greater than the critical value of 0.811, reject the null hypothesis.
05

Conclusion on the Hypothesis Test

Based on the comparison in Step 4, if \(|r|\) does not exceed 0.811, we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This means there is no significant linear relationship between stiffness and thickness.
06

Assess the Result in Light of \( r \)

Examine the calculated \( r \): if it is low or near zero, this supports the hypothesis test result that there is no strong linear correlation. If \( r \) was expected to be strong but isn't, it is indeed surprising.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical method used to make decisions about data. In the context of this exercise, it helps us determine if there is a statistically significant linear relationship between two variables: the stiffness and thickness of flame-retardant fabrics. The process begins with establishing two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (often denoted as \(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)).
The null hypothesis assumes that there is no relationship between the stiffness and thickness, meaning their correlation is zero. This is expressed as \(H_0: \rho = 0\). On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis suggests there is a relationship proposed to be not zero, noted as \(H_a: \rho eq 0\).
Put simply, hypothesis testing in this example is a method to assess whether observable data supports the idea of a linear connection between two fabric characteristics, or if any correlation present is merely due to random chance.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \(\alpha\), is a critical concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true—that is, a type I error. In this exercise, we use a significance level of 0.05.
Setting a significance level at 0.05 means that there is a 5% risk of concluding that there is a linear relationship between stiffness and thickness when there is none. This level is chosen for a balance between caution and the practicality of detecting true effects.
Thus, the significance level serves as a threshold for decision-making. When conducting the test, if the p-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha\), we would reject the null hypothesis, indicating a potentially meaningful correlation between stiffness and thickness. Conversely, a larger p-value suggests insufficient evidence to abandon the null hypothesis.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship indicates a consistent, proportional increase or decrease in one variable due to the change in another variable. In the current example, a linear relationship between the stiffness and thickness of fabrics means that as the stiffness increases, the thickness changes predictably and consistently.
The presence of a linear relationship is typically measured by the Pearson Correlation Coefficient \( r \). This coefficient ranges from -1 to 1, where values close to -1 or 1 indicate a strong linear relationship, and values near zero suggest no linear relationship.
If the calculated \( r \) value is significantly different from zero, it implies a likely linear relationship, which results in rejecting the null hypothesis in the context of hypothesis testing.
Critical Value
The critical value in hypothesis testing helps determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. It acts as a cutoff for deciding significant evidence of a relationship between variables, like stiffness and thickness.
To find the critical value, we use statistical tables corresponding to the degrees of freedom, derived from the sample size. In this exercise, with a significance level of 0.05 and 4 degrees of freedom \((n-2)\), the critical value is approximately 0.811.
  • If the absolute value of the calculated correlation coefficient \(|r|\) exceeds the critical value, it indicates that the observed effect is statistically significant, prompting the rejection of the null hypothesis.
  • On the other hand, if \(|r|\) is less than the critical value, it suggests a lack of strong linear relationship, meaning we should not reject the null hypothesis.
Critical values are central to understanding the statistical significance of the test results, allowing conclusions based on data-supported evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An investigation was carried out to study the relationship between speed (ft/sec) and stride rate (number of steps taken/sec) among female marathon runners. Resulting summary quantities included \(n=11, \quad \sum\) (speed) \(=205.4\), \(\sum(\text { speed })^{2}=3880.08, \sum(\) rate \()=35.16, \sum(\text { rate })^{2}=112.681\), and \(\sum(\) speed \()(\) rate \()=660.130\). a. Calculate the equation of the least squares line that you would use to predict stride rate from speed. b. Calculate the equation of the least squares line that you would use to predict speed from stride rate. c. Calculate the coefficient of determination for the regression of stride rate on speed of part (a) and for the regression of speed on stride rate of part (b). How are these related?

The following summary statistics were obtained from study that used regression analysis to investigate the relationship between pavement deflection and surface temperature of the pavement at various locations on a state highway. Here \(x=\) temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right)\) and \(y=\) deflection adjustment factor \((y \geq 0)\) : $$ \begin{aligned} &n=15 \quad \sum x_{i}=1425 \quad \sum y_{i}=10.68 \\ &\sum x_{i}^{2}=139,037.25 \quad \sum x_{i} y_{i}=987.645 \\ &\sum y_{i}^{2}=7.8518 \end{aligned} $$ (Many more than 15 observations were made in the study; the reference is "Flexible Pavement Evaluation and Rehabilitation," Transportation Eng. J., 1977: 75-85.) a. Compute \(\hat{\beta}_{1}, \hat{\beta}_{0}\), and the equation of the estimated regression line. Graph the estimated line. b. What is the estimate of expected change in the deflection adjustment factor when temperature is increased by \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ? c. Suppose temperature were measured in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) rather than in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). What would be the estimated regression line? Answer part (b) for an increase of \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). [Hint: \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}=(9 / 5)^{\circ} \mathrm{C}+32\); now substitute for the "old \(x\) " in terms of the "new \(x\)."] d. If a \(200^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) surface temperature were within the realm of possibility, would you use the estimated line of part (a) to predict deflection factor for this temperature? Why or why not?

Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are positive variables and that a sample of \(n\) pairs results in \(r \approx 1\). If the sample correlation coefficient is computed for the \(\left(x, y^{2}\right)\) pairs, will the resulting value also be approximately 1 ? Explain.

The article "Exhaust Emissions from Four-Stroke Lawn Mower Engines" (J. of the Air and Water Mgmnt. Assoc., 1997: 945-952) reported data from a study in which both a baseline gasoline mixture and a reformulated gasoline were used. Consider the following observations on age (yr) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{X}\) emissions \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{kWh})\) : $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Engine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Age } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 11 & 7 \\ \text { Baseline } & 1.72 & 4.38 & 4.06 & 1.26 & 5.31 \\ \text { Reformulated } & 1.88 & 5.93 & 5.54 & 2.67 & 6.53 \\ \text { Engine } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \text { Age } & 16 & 9 & 0 & 12 & 4 \\ \text { Baseline } & .57 & 3.37 & 3.44 & .74 & 1.24 \\ \text { Reformulated } & .74 & 4.94 & 4.89 & .69 & 1.42 \end{array} $$ Construct scatter plots of \(\mathrm{NO}_{\mathrm{x}}\) emissions versus age. What appears to be the nature of the relationship between these two variables? [Note: The authors of the cited article commented on the relationship.]

The decline of water supplies in certain areas of the United States has created the need for increased understanding of relationships between economic factors such as crop yield and hydrologic and soil factors. The article "Variability of Soil Water Properties and Crop Yield in a Sloped Watershed" (Water 91Ó°ÊÓ Bull., 1988: 281-288) gives data on grain sorghum yield ( \(y\), in \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}\)-row) and distance upslope \((x\), in \(\mathrm{m})\) on a sloping watershed. Selected observations are given in the accompanying table. \begin{tabular}{r|rrrrrrr} \(x\) & 0 & 10 & 20 & 30 & 45 & 50 & 70 \\ \hline\(y\) & 500 & 590 & 410 & 470 & 450 & 480 & 510 \\ \(x\) & 80 & 100 & 120 & 140 & 160 & 170 & 190 \\ \hline\(y\) & 450 & 360 & 400 & 300 & 410 & 280 & 350 \end{tabular} a. Construct a scatter plot. Does the simple linear regression model appear to be plausible? b. Carry out a test of model utility. c. Estimate true average yield when distance upslope is 75 by giving an interval of plausible values.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.