/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 80 Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are positive variables and that a sample of \(n\) pairs results in \(r \approx 1\). If the sample correlation coefficient is computed for the \(\left(x, y^{2}\right)\) pairs, will the resulting value also be approximately 1 ? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correlation with \( (x, y^2) \) is not necessarily 1; transformation alters linearity.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Correlation

The correlation coefficient \( r \) measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. If \( r \approx 1 \), it indicates a strong positive linear relationship.
02

Analyze Transformation Impact

When we transform \( y \) to \( y^2 \), we are changing one of the variables. This transformation may change the joint distribution between \( x \) and \( y \) significantly, as squaring alters the values and potentially the linearity.
03

Correlation of \( x \) and \( y^2 \)

The correlation between \( x \) and \( y^2 \) is not necessarily equal to the correlation between \( x \) and \( y \). Squaring \( y \) can change the nature of its distribution, breaking linearity and affecting \( r \). The correlation \( r \) for \( (x, y^2) \) could be different.
04

Conclusion

Since \( y^2 \) is not a linear transformation of \( y \), the sample correlation \( r \) between \( x \) and \( y^2 \) is not necessarily approximately 1 even if \( r \) between \( x \) and \( y \) is approximately 1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Transformation Impact
Transformations can significantly affect the behavior of variables. When working with data, transforming a variable means altering its values by applying a mathematical operation. For instance, converting variable \( y \) to \( y^2 \) involves squaring each data point in \( y \).Such a transformation can lead to changes in the joint distribution of the variables involved. Joint distribution is a statistical term that describes the probability of two events occurring together. If the original pair \( (x, y) \) had a certain pattern or distribution, altering \( y \) to \( y^2 \) can disrupt that pattern.This disruption mainly occurs because squaring affects the data by emphasizing larger values and reducing the relative differences between smaller values. Therefore, if the original relationship between \( x \) and \( y \) was linear, transforming \( y \) to \( y^2 \) could completely change the nature of their relationship. This transformation might affect not just the individual values, but also the correlation or relationship they share.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship between two variables means that as one variable increases, the other tends to increase (or decrease) at a constant rate. When plotted on a graph, data points following a linear pattern ideally form a straight line. The correlation coefficient, which ranges from -1 to 1, measures the strength and direction of this linear relationship.An \( r \) value close to +1 indicates a very strong positive linear correlation, meaning that when one variable goes up, the other one tends to increase proportionally. Conversely, an \( r \) value close to -1 would indicate a strong negative linear correlation. If \( r \) is approximately 1 for \( x \) and \( y \), it suggests that their relationship is nearly perfectly linear. However, altering \( y \) to \( y^2 \) disrupts this linearity, potentially changing how the data points relate and leading to a different linear correlation, or even a non-linear one, where the patterns are not consistent across the range of data.
Sample Correlation Coefficient
The sample correlation coefficient, represented by \( r \), provides valuable insight into the relationship between two variable data sets. It's a statistical measure that describes how well two variables move in relation to one another in a linear fashion.Computing \( r \) involves examining the covariance of the variables and their standard deviations. The result, \( r \), is a dimensionless quantity that illustrates whether the variables have a positive or negative association and how strong that association is.When you initially find that the correlation coefficient for a pair \( (x, y) \) is around 1, it suggests a near-perfect linear relationship. However, transforming one of these variables, such as changing \( y \) to \( y^2 \), alters this calculation. This means the sample correlation coefficient for the transformed pair \( (x, y^2) \) could differ because this transformation might disrupt the original linear association. It emphasizes the importance of properly understanding the dataset's structure before and after transformations to accurately interpret the correlation coefficient and its implications on statistical analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Exhaust Emissions from Four-Stroke Lawn Mower Engines" (J. of the Air and Water Mgmnt. Assoc., 1997: 945-952) reported data from a study in which both a baseline gasoline mixture and a reformulated gasoline were used. Consider the following observations on age (yr) and \(\mathrm{NO}_{X}\) emissions \((\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{kWh})\) : $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \text { Engine } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Age } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 11 & 7 \\ \text { Baseline } & 1.72 & 4.38 & 4.06 & 1.26 & 5.31 \\ \text { Reformulated } & 1.88 & 5.93 & 5.54 & 2.67 & 6.53 \\ \text { Engine } & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \text { Age } & 16 & 9 & 0 & 12 & 4 \\ \text { Baseline } & .57 & 3.37 & 3.44 & .74 & 1.24 \\ \text { Reformulated } & .74 & 4.94 & 4.89 & .69 & 1.42 \end{array} $$ Construct scatter plots of \(\mathrm{NO}_{\mathrm{x}}\) emissions versus age. What appears to be the nature of the relationship between these two variables? [Note: The authors of the cited article commented on the relationship.]

The article "A Dual-Buffer Titration Method for Lime Requirement of Acid Mine- soils" (J. of Environ. Qual., 1988: \(452-456\) ) reports on the results of a study relating to revegetation of soil at mine reclamation sites. With \(x=\mathrm{KCl}\) extractable aluminum and \(y=\) amount of lime required to bring soil \(\mathrm{pH}\) to \(7.0\), data in the article resulted in the following summary statistics: \(n=24, \quad \sum x=48.15, \quad \sum x^{2}=\) \(155.4685, \sum y=263.5, \sum y^{2}=3750.53\), and \(\sum x y=658.455\). Carry out a test at significance level .01 to see whether the population correlation coefficient is something other than 0 .

The catch basin in a storm sewer system is the interface between surface runoff and the sewer. The catch basin insert is a device for retrofitting catch basins to improve pollutant removal properties. The article "An Evaluation of the Urban Stormwater Pollutant Removal Efficiency of Catch Basin Inserts" (Water Envir: Res., 2005: 500-510) reported on tests of various inserts under controlled conditions for which inflow is close to what can be expected in the field. Consider the following data, read from a graph in the article, for one particular type of insert on \(x=\) amount filtered (1000s of liters) and \(y=\%\) total suspended solids removed. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccccccc} x & 23 & 45 & 68 & 91 & 114 & 136 & 159 & 182 & 205 & 228 \\ \hline y & 53.3 & 26.9 & 54.8 & 33.8 & 29.9 & 8.2 & 17.2 & 12.2 & 3.2 & 11.1 \end{array} $$ Summary quantities are $$ \begin{aligned} &\sum x_{i}=1251, \sum x_{i}^{2}=199,365, \sum y_{i}=250.6, \sum y_{i}^{2}=9249.36 \text {, } \\ &\sum x_{i} y_{i}=21,904.4 \end{aligned} $$ a. Does a scatter plot support the choice of the simple linear regression model? Explain. b. Obtain the equation of the least squares line. c. What proportion of observed variation in \% removed can be attributed to the model relationship? d. Does the simple linear regression model specify a useful relationship? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05\). e. Is there strong evidence for concluding that there is at least a \(2 \%\) decrease in true average suspended solid removal associated with a 10,000 liter increase in the amount filtered? Test appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). f. Calculate an interpret a \(95 \%\) CI for true average \(\%\) removed when amount filtered is 100,000 liters. How does this interval compare in width to a CI when amount filtered is 200,000 liters? g. Calculate and interpret a \(95 \%\) PI for \% removed when amount filtered is 100,000 liters. How does this interval compare in width to the CI calculated in (f) and to a PI when amount filtered is 200,000 liters?

Suppose an investigator has data on the amount of shelf space \(x\) devoted to display of a particular product and sales revenue \(y\) for that product. The investigator may wish to fit a model for which the true regression line passes through \((0,0)\). The appropriate model is \(Y=\beta_{1} x+\epsilon\). Assume that \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right), \ldots\), \(\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right)\) are observed pairs generated from this model, and derive the least squares estimator of \(\beta_{1}\). [Hint: Write the sum of squared deviations as a function of \(b_{1}\), a trial value, and use calculus to find the minimizing value of \(b_{1}\).]

The probability of a type II error for the \(t\) test for \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\) \(\beta_{10}\) can be computed in the same manner as it was computed for the \(t\) tests of Chapter 8 . If the alternative value of \(\beta_{1}\) is denoted by \(\beta_{1}^{\prime}\), the value of $$ d=\frac{\left|\beta_{10}-\beta_{1}^{\prime}\right|}{\sigma \sqrt{\frac{n-1}{\sum x_{i}^{2}-\left(\sum x_{i}\right)^{2} / n}}} $$ is first calculated, then the appropriate set of curves in Appendix Table A.17 is entered on the horizontal axis at the value of \(d\), and \(\beta\) is read from the curve for \(n-2 \mathrm{df}\). An article in the Journal of Public Health Engineering reports the results of a regression analysis based on \(n=15\) observations in which \(x=\) filter application temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) and \(y=\%\) efficiency of BOD removal. Calculated quantities include \(\sum x_{i}=402, \sum x_{i}^{2}=11,098, s=3.725\), and \(\hat{\beta}_{1}=1.7035\). Consider testing at level .01 \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=1\), which states that the expected increase in \(\%\) BOD removal is 1 when filter application temperature increases by \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), against the alternative \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \beta_{1}>1\). Determine \(\mathrm{P}\) (type II error) when \(\beta_{1}^{\prime}=2, \sigma=4\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.