/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 The following data is representa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following data is representative of that reported in the article "An Experimental Correlation of Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions from Power Boilers Based on Field Data" (J. of Engr: for Power, July 1973: 165-170), with emission rate \((\mathrm{ppm})\) : $$ \begin{array}{l|lllllll} x & 100 & 125 & 125 & 150 & 150 & 200 & 200 \\ \hline y & 150 & 140 & 180 & 210 & 190 & 320 & 280 \\ x & 250 & 250 & 300 & 300 & 350 & 400 & 400 \\ \hline y & 400 & 430 & 440 & 390 & 600 & 610 & 670 \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that the simple linear regression model is valid, obtain the least squares estimate of the true regression line. b. What is the estimate of expected \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate when burner area liberation rate equals 225 ? c. Estimate the amount by which you expect \(\mathrm{NO}_{x}\) emission rate to change when burner area liberation rate is decreased by 50 . d. Would you use the estimated regression line to predict emission rate for a liberation rate of 500 ? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Regression line: \( y = 146.33 + 0.8946x \). b) Estimated emission: 347.615 ppm. c) Change in emission rate: -44.73 ppm. d) Not recommended for \( x = 500 \).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Mean of x and y

To find the mean values for the predictor variable \( x \) and response variable \( y \), sum the values in each data set and divide by the number of observations.\[\bar{x} = \frac{100 + 125 + \ldots + 400}{14} = 237.5\]\[\bar{y} = \frac{150 + 140 + \ldots + 670}{14} = 360\]
02

Calculate the Slope (b1) and Intercept (b0)

To find the least squares estimates, calculate the slope \( b_1 \) using the formula:\[b_1 = \frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2}\]Calculate the intercept \( b_0 \):\[b_0 = \bar{y} - b_1\bar{x}\]Plugging in the calculations:\( b_1 = \frac{42000}{46962.5} = 0.8946 \)\( b_0 = 360 - 0.8946 \times 237.5 = 146.33 \) So, the regression equation is:\[y = 146.33 + 0.8946x\]
03

Predict NOx Emission Rate for x=225

To predict \( NO_x \) emission for \( x = 225 \), substitute \( x = 225 \) into the regression equation:\[y = 146.33 + 0.8946 \times 225 \]Calculate:\[y = 146.33 + 201.285 = 347.615\]
04

Estimate the Change in NOx Emission if x Decreases by 50

The slope of the regression line, \( b_1 = 0.8946 \), indicates how much the predicted \( NO_x \) emission rate changes with a unit change in \( x \). Therefore, decreasing \( x \) by 50 changes \( y \) by:\[0.8946 \times (-50) = -44.73\]
05

Decide on Using the Regression Line for a Liberation Rate of 500

The extrapolation beyond the observed x-values (100 to 400) to predict \( NO_x \) at \( x = 500 \) is risky because it falls outside the range of data used to fit the regression line. Thus, it's not recommended to use this model for \( x = 500 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Least Squares Estimate
Least squares estimation is a core technique in linear regression, used to find the line that best fits a set of data points on a graph. This technique minimizes the sum of the squared differences, or residuals, between the observed values and those predicted by the linear model.
The regression equation is typically written as \( y = b_0 + b_1x \), where:
  • \( y \) is the dependent variable we're trying to predict.
  • \( x \) is the independent variable, which influences \( y \).
  • \( b_0 \) is the y-intercept of the line.
  • \( b_1 \) is the slope of the line, indicating the change in \( y \) for a one-unit change in \( x \).
The goal of least squares estimation is to calculate \( b_0 \) and \( b_1 \) such that the sum of the squares of the differences between the observed values and those predicted by the model is minimized. This method effectively finds the line that fits the data best by reducing prediction errors.
Slope and Intercept Calculation
Calculating the slope and intercept is crucial in determining the linear relationship between two variables. This involves finding \( b_1 \) for the slope and \( b_0 \) for the intercept using specific formulas.
The formula for the slope \( b_1 \) is:\[ b_1 = \frac{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y})}{\sum (x_i - \bar{x})^2} \]where:
  • \( x_i \) and \( y_i \) are individual data points.
  • \( \bar{x} \) and \( \bar{y} \) are the means of \( x \) and \( y \) respectively.
Once the slope is calculated, the intercept \( b_0 \) can be determined using:\[ b_0 = \bar{y} - b_1\bar{x} \]This intercept is the point where the line crosses the y-axis, which represents the value of \( y \) when \( x \) is zero.
Understanding and calculating these components help in forming the regression equation, which can then be used for making predictions based on the relationship between the variables.
Extrapolation
Extrapolation involves extending a model beyond the range of the observed data. It is typically used to make predictions about unknown values based on the trends established by the current data. While it can be useful, it also carries risks and uncertainties, particularly if the extrapolated values are far outside the data range.
In linear regression analysis, extrapolation can lead to questionable predictions because the relationship established within the data range may not hold outside of it.
  • If we have data ranging from 100 to 400 and want to make predictions at 500, the result can be unreliable because we are assuming the same linear trend holds true beyond the observed data.
  • It’s essential to be cautious while extrapolating, as the model accuracy diminishes when predicting values that weren't part of the initial model fit.
To mitigate the risks of extrapolation, it is advisable to collect more data covering a broader range, ensuring any predictions lie within this range, thereby improving the prediction accuracy and reliability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The probability of a type II error for the \(t\) test for \(H_{0}: \beta_{1}=\beta_{10}\) can be computed in the same manner as it was computed for the \(t\) tests of Chapter 8 . If the alternative value of \(\beta_{1}\) is denoted by \(\beta_{1}^{\prime}\), the value of $$ d=\frac{\left|\beta_{10}-\beta_{1}^{\prime}\right|}{\sigma \sqrt{\frac{n-1}{S_{x x}}}} $$ is first calculated, then the appropriate set of curves in Appendix Table A.17 is entered on the horizontal axis at the value of \(d\), and \(\beta\) is read from the curve for \(n-2\) df. An article in the Journal of Public Health Engineering reports the results of a regression analysis based on \(n=15\) observations in which \(x=\) filter application temerature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) and \(y=\%\) efficiency of BOD removal. Calculated quantities include \(\Sigma x_{i}=402, \Sigma x_{i}^{2}=11,098, s=3.725\), and \(\hat{\beta}_{1}=1.7035\). Consider testing at level \(.01 H_{0}: \beta_{1}=1\), which states that the expected increase in \(\%\) BOD removal is 1 when filter application temperature increases by \(1^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), against the alternative \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: \beta_{1}>1\). Determine \(P\) (type II error) when \(\beta_{1}^{\prime}=2, \sigma=4\).

Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are positive variables and that a sample of \(n\) pairs results in \(r \approx 1\). If the sample correlation coefficient is computed for the \(\left(x, y^{2}\right)\) pairs, will the resulting value also be approximately 1 ? Explain.

The catch basin in a storm-sewer system is the interface between surface runoff and the sewer. The catch-basin insert is a device for retrofitting catch basins to improve pollutantremoval properties. The article "An Evaluation of the Urban Stormwater Pollutant Removal Efficiency of Catch Basin Inserts" (Water Envir. Res., 2005: 500-510) reported on tests of various inserts under controlled conditions for which inflow is close to what can be expected in the field. Consider the following data, read from a graph in the article, for one particular type of insert on \(x=\) amount filtered (1000s of liters) and \(y=\%\) total suspended solids removed. $$ \begin{array}{l|cccccccccc} x & 23 & 45 & 68 & 91 & 114 & 136 & 159 & 182 & 205 & 228 \\ \hline y & 53.3 & 26.9 & 54.8 & 33.8 & 29.9 & 8.2 & 17.2 & 12.2 & 3.2 & 11.1 \end{array} $$ Summary quantities are $$ \begin{aligned} &\sum x_{i}=1251, \sum x_{i}^{2}=199,365, \sum y_{i}=250.6, \\ &\sum y_{i}^{2}=9249.36, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=21,904.4 \end{aligned} $$ a. Does a scatterplot support the choice of the simple linear regression model? Explain. b. Obtain the equation of the least squares line. c. What proportion of observed variation in \% removed can be attributed to the model relationship? d. Does the simple linear regression model specify a useful relationship? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses using a significance level of .05. e. Is there strong evidence for concluding that there is at least a \(2 \%\) decrease in true average suspended solid removal associated with a 10,000 liter increase in the amount filtered? Test appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05 .\) f. Calculate and interpret a \(95 \%\) CI for true average \(\%\) removed when amount filtered is 100,000 liters. How does this interval compare in width to a CI when amount filtered is 200,000 liters? g. Calculate and interpret a \(95 \%\) PI for \% removed when amount filtered is 100,000 liters. How does this interval compare in width to the CI calculated in (f) and to a PI when amount filtered is 200,000 liters?

Suppose an investigator has data on the amount of shelf space \(x\) devoted to display of a particular product and sales revenue \(y\) for that product. The investigator may wish to fit a model for which the true regression line passes through \((0,0)\). The appropriate model is \(Y=\beta_{1} x+\epsilon\). Assume that \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right)\) are observed pairs generated from this model, and derive the least squares estimator of \(\beta_{1}\). [Hint: Write the sum of squared deviations as a function of \(b_{1}\), a trial value, and use calculus to find the minimizing value of \(b_{1}\).]

An investigation was carried out to study the relationship between speed (ft/sec) and stride rate (number of steps taken/sec) among female marathon runners. Resulting summary quantities included \(n=11, \Sigma\) (speed) \(=205.4\), \(\Sigma(\text { speed })^{2}=3880.08, \Sigma\) (rate \()=35.16, \Sigma(\text { rate })^{2}=112.681\), and \(\Sigma(\) speed \()(\) rate \()=660.130 .\) a. Calculate the equation of the least squares line that you would use to predict stride rate from speed. b. Calculate the equation of the least squares line that you would use to predict speed from stride rate. c. Calculate the coefficient of determination for the regression of stride rate on speed of part (a) and for the regression of speed on stride rate of part (b). How are these related?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.