/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q30E The target value for the diamete... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The target value for the diameter of a certain type of driveshaft is \(.75\) in. The size of the shift in the average diameter considered important to detect is \(.002\) in. Sample average diameters for successive groups of \(n = 4\)shafts are as follows: \(.7507,.7504,.7492,.7501,.7503\), \(.7510,.7490,.7497,.7488,.7504,.7516,.7472,.7489\), \(.7483,.7471,.7498,.7460,.7482,.7470,.7493,.7462\), \(.7481\). Use the computational form of the CUSUM procedure with \(h = .003\) to see whether the process mean remained on target throughout the time of observation.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Tuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhe process mean has shifted to a value which is smaller than the target \(\mu = 0.75\).

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:To Find the Taylor polynomial Degree

Let\({d_0} = {e_0} = 0\). Use formulas

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{l}}{\left. {{d_l} = \max \left( {0,{d_{l - 1}} + \left( {{{\bar x}_l} - \left( {{\mu _0} + k} \right)} \right)} \right)} \right),}&{l = 1,2, \ldots }\\{\left. {{e_l} = \max \left( {0,{e_{l - 1}} - \left( {{{\bar x}_l} - \left( {{\mu _0} - k} \right)} \right)} \right)} \right),}&{l = 1,2, \ldots }\end{aligned}\)

to compute\({d_1},{d_2}, \ldots \), and\({e_1},{e_2}, \ldots \), where\(k\)is the slope of the lower arm of the\(V\)-mask - its value is taken as\(\Delta /2\)(\(\Delta \)is size of a shift in\(\mu \)on which the attention is). If in a time\(r\), both\({d_r}\)and\({e_r}\)are larger than\(h\), the process is out of control. Inequality\({d_r} > h\)means that the process mean is greater than the target value, and inequality\({e_r} > h\)means that the process mean is smaller than the target value.

As one can notice,\({\mu _0} = 0.75\), value\(k\)is

\(k = \frac{\Delta }{2} = 0.001\)

and\(h = 0.003\). Using the formula above, one can compute\({d_i},e_i^\prime \)s for every\(i\)as

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{l}}{\left. {{d_l} = \max \left( {0,{d_{l - 1}} + \left( {{{\bar x}_l} - 0.751} \right)} \right)} \right),}&{l = 1,2, \ldots }\\{\left. {{e_l} = \max \left( {0,{e_{l - 1}} - \left( {{{\bar x}_l} - 0.749} \right)} \right)} \right),\;\;\;l = 1,2, \ldots }&{}\end{aligned}\)

The following tables represents all values from which one can see if the process is in-control or out-of-control.

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}i&{{{\bar x}_i} - 16.05}&{{d_i}}\\1&{ - 0.0003}&0\\2&{ - 0.0006}&0\\3&{ - 0.0018}&0\\4&{ - 0.0009}&0\\5&{ - 0.0007}&0\\6&0&0\\7&{ - 0.002}&0\\8&{ - 0.0013}&0\\9&{ - 0.0022}&0\\{10}&{ - 0.0006}&0\\{11}&{0.0006}&{0.0006}\\{12}&{ - 0.0038}&0\\{13}&{ - 0.0021}&0\\{14}&{ - 0.0027}&0\\{15}&{ - 0.0039}&0\\{16}&{ - 0.0012}&0\\{17}&{ - 0.005}&0\\{18}&{ - 0.0028}&0\\{19}&{ - 0.004}&0\\{20}&{ - 0.0017}&0\\{21}&{ - 0.0048}&0\\{22}&{ - 0.0029}&0\\{}&{}&{}\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}i&{{{\bar x}_i} - 15.95}&{{e_i}}\\1&{0.0017}&0\\2&{0.0014}&0\\3&{0.0002}&0\\4&{0.0011}&0\\5&{0.0013}&0\\6&{0.0020}&{}\\7&0&0\\8&{0.0007}&0\\9&{ - 0.0002}&{0.0002}\\{10}&{0.0014}&0\\{11}&{0.0026}&0\\{12}&{ - 0.0018}&{0.0018}\\{13}&{ - 0.0001}&{0.0019}\\{14}&{ - 0.0007}&{0.0026}\\{15}&{ - 0.0019}&{0.0045}\\{16}&{0.0008}&{0.0037}\\{17}&{ - 0.003}&{0.0067}\\{18}&{ - 0.0008}&{0.0075}\\{19}&{ - 0.002}&{0.0095}\\{20}&{0.0003}&{0.0092}\\{21}&{ - 0.0028}&{0.0120}\\{22}&{ - 0.0009}&{0.0129}\\{}&{}&{}\end{aligned}\)

02

Step 2:Final proof

For \(r = 15{e_r} = 0.0045 > h = 0.003\); thus, the process mean has shifted to a value which is smaller than the target \(\mu = 0.75\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Example \(16.11\), in which a single-sample plan with \(n = 50\) and \(c = 2\) was employed.

a. Calculate \(AOQ\) for \(p = .01,.02, \ldots ,.10\). What does this suggest about the value of \(p\) for which \(AOQ\) is a maximum and the corresponding \(AOQL\) ?

b. Determine the value of \(p\) for which \(AOQ\) is a maximum and the corresponding value of \(AOQL\). (Hint: Use calculus.)

c. For \(N = 2000\), calculate ATI for the values of \(p\) given in part (a).

If a process variable is normally distributed, in the long run virtually all observed values should be between饾潄-3饾潏and饾潄+3饾潏, giving a process spread of 6饾潏.

a.With LSL and USL denoting the lower and upper specification limits, one commonly used process capability indexis Cp = (USL 鈥 LSL)/6饾潏. The value Cp= 1 indicates a process that is only marginally capable of meeting specifications. Ideally, Cp should exceed 1.33 (a 鈥渧ery good鈥 process). Calculate the value of Cp for each of the cork production processes described in the previous exercise, and comment.

b. The Cp index described in (a) does not take into account process location. A capability measure that does involve the process mean is Cpk = min {(饾潏USL -饾潄)/3饾潏, (饾潄鈥 LSL)/3饾潏} Calculate the value of Cpk for each of the cork production processes described in the previous exercise, and comment. (Note: In practice, m and s have to be estimated from process data; we show how to do this in Section 16.2)

c. How do Cp and Cpk compare, and when are they equal?

Resistance observations (ohms) for subgroups of a certain type of register gave the following summary quantities:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}i&{{n_i}}&{{{\overline x }_i}}&{{s_i}}&i&{{n_i}}&{{{\overline x }_i}}&{{s_i}}\\1&4&{430.0}&{22.5}&{11}&4&{445.2}&{27.3}\\2&4&{418.2}&{20.6}&{12}&4&{430.1}&{22.2}\\3&3&{435.5}&{25.1}&{13}&4&{427.2}&{24.0}\\4&4&{427.6}&{22.3}&{14}&4&{439.6}&{23.3}\\5&4&{444.0}&{21.5}&{15}&3&{415.9}&{31.2}\\6&3&{431.4}&{28.9}&{16}&4&{419.8}&{27.5}\\7&4&{420.8}&{25.4}&{17}&3&{447.0}&{19.8}\\8&4&{431.4}&{24.0}&{18}&4&{434.4}&{23.7}\\9&4&{428.7}&{21.2}&{19}&4&{422.2}&{25.1}\\{10}&4&{440.1}&{25.8}&{20}&4&{425.7}&{24.4}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Refer to Exercise\(11\). An assignable cause was found for the unusually high sample average refractive index on day\(22\). Recompute control limits after deleting the data from this day. What do you conclude?

When\({S^2}i\)s the sample variance of a normal random sample,\((n - 1){S^2}/{\sigma ^2}\)has a chi-squared distribution with\(n - 1df\), so

\(P\left( {\chi _{.999,n - 1}^2 < \frac{{(n - 1){S^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}} < \chi _{.001,n - 1}^2} \right) = .998\)

from which

\(P\left( {\frac{{{\sigma ^2}\chi _{.999,n - 1}^2}}{{n - 1}} < {S^2} < \frac{{{\sigma ^2}\chi _{.001,n - 1}^2}}{{n - 1}}} \right) = .998\)

This suggests that an alternative chart for controlling process variation involves plotting the sample variances and using the control limits

\(\begin{aligned}{l}LCL = \overline {{s^2}} {\chi _{ - 999_{ - n - 1}^2}}/(n - 1)\\UCL = \overline {{s^2}} \chi _{.001,n - 1}^2/(n - 1)\end{aligned}\)

Construct the corresponding chart for the data of Exercise\(11\). (Hint: The lower- and upper-tailed chi-squared critical values for\(5\)df are\(.210\)and\(20.515\), respectively.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.