/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q33E The May 1, 2009, issue of the Mo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The May 1, 2009, issue of the Mont clarian reported the following home sale amounts for a sample of homes in Alameda, CA that were sold the previous month (1000s of $):

590 815 575 608 350 1285 408 540 555 679

  1. Calculate and interpret the sample mean and median.
  2. Suppose the 6th observation had been 985 rather than 1285. How would the mean and median change?
  3. Calculate a 20% trimmed mean by first trimming the two smallest and two largest observations.
  4. Calculate a 15% trimmed mean.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The sample mean amount is 640.5(1000s of $) and median value is 582.5(1000s of $).

b. The sample mean amount is 610.5(1000s of $) and The median value is 582.5(1000s of $).

c. The 20% trimmed mean is 591.2. (1000s of $)

d. The 15% trimmed mean is 593.71(1000s of $).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data for home sale amounts in (1000s of $) for a sample of homes in Alameda, CA, sold the previous month is provided.

02

Compute the sample mean and median

a. Let x represents the home sales amounts.

The sample mean is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x &=& \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &=& \frac{{590 + 815 + 575 + ... + 679}}{{10}}\\ &=& \frac{{6405}}{{10}}\\ &=& 640.5\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample mean amount is 640.5(1000s of $).

The sample median is computed by first ordering the data in ascending order.

350

408

540

555

575

590

608

679

815

1285

The data provided is arranged in ascending order.

For the even number of observations, the median value is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\tilde x &=& {\rm{average}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\left( {\frac{{\rm{n}}}{{\rm{2}}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{and}}\;{\left( {\frac{{\rm{n}}}{{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ + 1}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}\;{\rm{ordered}}\;{\rm{values}}\\ &=& {\rm{average}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\left( {\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{\rm{2}}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{and}}\;{\left( {\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ + 1}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}\;{\rm{ordered}}\;{\rm{values}}\\ &=& {\rm{average}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\left( {\rm{5}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{and}}\;{\left( {\rm{6}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}\;{\rm{ordered}}\;{\rm{values}}\\ &=& \frac{{575 + 590}}{2}\\ &=& 582.5\end{array}\)

Thus, the median value is 582.5(1000s of $).

03

Interpret the values

Interpretation of mean:

The averagehome sale amount for a sample of homes in Alameda, CA that were sold the previous month is 640.5 (1000s of $).

Interpretation of median:

The central or middlemosthome sale amount for a sample of homes in Alameda, CA that were sold the previous month is582.5 (1000s of $).

04

Compute the sample mean and median by replacing a value

b. The value of the 6th observation is 985 instead of 1285.

The sample mean is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x &=& \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &=& \frac{{590 + 815 + 575 + ... + 679}}{{10}}\\ &=& \frac{{6105}}{{10}}\\ &=& 610.5\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample mean amount is 610.5(1000s of $).

The sample median is computed by first ordering the data in ascending order.

The data is arranged as,

350

408

540

555

575

590

608

679

815

985

For the even number of observations, the median value is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\tilde x &=& {\rm{average}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\left( {\frac{{\rm{n}}}{{\rm{2}}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{and}}\;{\left( {\frac{{\rm{n}}}{{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ + 1}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}\;{\rm{ordered}}\;{\rm{values}}\\ &=& {\rm{average}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\left( {\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{\rm{2}}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{and}}\;{\left( {\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ + 1}}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}\;{\rm{ordered}}\;{\rm{values}}\\ &=& {\rm{average}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\left( {\rm{5}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}{\rm{and}}\;{\left( {\rm{6}} \right)^{{\rm{th}}}}\;{\rm{ordered}}\;{\rm{values}}\\ &=& \frac{{575 + 590}}{2}\\ &=& 582.5\end{array}\)

Thus, the median value is 582.5(1000s of $).

Therefore, with the change in the value of 6th observation the mean value decreases from 640.5 to 610.5 while the median value remains the same.

05

Compute the 20% trimmed mean

c. Let x represents the home sales amounts.

Trimmed mean is obtained by omitting few smallest and largest values from the data.

The data after trimming the two smallest and two largest observations is as follows,

540

555

575

590

608

679

The 20% trimmed mean is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_{\left( {tr20} \right)}} &=& \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &=& \frac{{540 + 555 + 575 + ... + 679}}{6}\\ &=& \frac{{3547}}{6}\\ &=& 591.2\end{array}\)

Thus, the 20% trimmed mean is 591.2(1000s of $).

06

Compute the 15% trimmed mean

d. Let x represents the home sales amounts.

A 15% trimmed mean is computed in two steps as shown below; by removing the smallest and the largest observation from the data as 15% of 10 is 1.5.

The data after removing the smallest and largest observation is as follows

408

540

555

575

590

608

679

815

The sample mean for the remaining values is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_{\left( {tr15} \right)}} &=& \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &=& \frac{{408 + 540 + 555 + ... + 815}}{8}\\ &=& 596.25\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample meanof the remaining valuesis 591.2 (1000s of $).

Now, again remove the smallest and largest value from the remaining dataset.

The data after removing is as follows,

540

555

575

590

608

679

The sample meanfor the remaining values is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_{\left( {tr2} \right)}} &=& \frac{{\sum {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ &=& \frac{{540 + 555 + ... + 679}}{6}\\ &=& 591.167\end{array}\)

Thus, the sample meanof the remaining valuesis 591.167(1000s of $).

Now, the trimmed mean is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\bar x}_{tr}} &=& \frac{{{{\bar x}_{\left( {tr20} \right)}} + {{\bar x}_{\left( {tr15} \right)}}}}{2}\\ &=& \frac{{596.25 + 591.167}}{2}\\ &=& 593.708\\ \approx 593.71\end{array}\)

Thus, the 15% trimmed mean is 593.71(1000s of $).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying data set consists of observations,on shower-flow rate (L/min) for a sample of n=129,houses in Perth, Australia (鈥淎n Application of Bayes,Methodology to the Analysis of Diary Records in a

Water Use Study,鈥 J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 1987: 705鈥711):

4.6 12.3 7.1 7.0 4.0 9.2 6.7 6.9 11.5 5.1

11.2 10.5 14.3 8.0 8.8 6.4 5.1 5.6 9.6 7.5

7.5 6.2 5.8 2.3 3.4 10.4 9.8 6.6 3.7 6.4

8.3 6.5 7.6 9.3 9.2 7.3 5.0 6.3 13.8 6.2

5.4 4.8 7.5 6.0 6.9 10.8 7.5 6.6 5.0 3.3

7.6 3.9 11.9 2.2 15.0 7.2 6.1 15.3 18.9 7.2

5.4 5.5 4.3 9.0 12.7 11.3 7.4 5.0 3.5 8.2

8.4 7.3 10.3 11.9 6.0 5.6 9.5 9.3 10.4 9.7

5.1 6.7 10.2 6.2 8.4 7.0 4.8 5.6 10.5 14.6

10.8 15.5 7.5 6.4 3.4 5.5 6.6 5.9 15.0 9.6

7.8 7.0 6.9 4.1 3.6 11.9 3.7 5.7 6.8 11.3

9.3 9.6 10.4 9.3 6.9 9.8 9.1 10.6 4.5 6.2

8.3 3.2 4.9 5.0 6.0 8.2 6.3 3.8 6.0

  1. Construct a stem-and-leaf display of the data.
  2. What is a typical, or representative, flow rate?
  3. Does the display appear to be highly concentrated or spread out?
  4. Does the distribution of values appear to be reasonably symmetric? If not, how would you describe the departure from symmetry?
  5. Would you describe any observation as being far from the rest of the data (an outlier)?

Many universities and colleges have instituted supplemental

instruction (SI) programs, in which a student facilitator meets regularly with a small group of students enrolled in the course to promote discussion of course material and enhance subject mastery. Suppose that students in a large statistics course (what else?) are randomly divided into a control group that will not participate in SI and a treatment group that will participate. At the end of the term, each student鈥檚 total score in the course is determined.

a. Are the scores from the SI group a sample from an existing population? If so, what is it? If not, what is the relevant conceptual population?

b. What do you think is the advantage of randomly dividing the students into the two groups rather than letting each student choose which group to join?

c. Why didn鈥檛 the investigators put all students in the treatment group? [Note:The article 鈥淪upplemental Instruction: An Effective Component of Student Affairs Programming鈥 (J. of College Student Devel., 1997: 577鈥586) discusses the analysis of data from several SI programs.]

a. If a constant cis added to each \({x_i}\)in a sample, yielding \({y_i} = {x_i} + c\), how do the sample mean and median of the \({y_i}'s\)relate to the mean and median of the\({x_i}'s\)? Verify your conjectures.

b. If each \({x_i}\)is multiplied by a constant c,yielding \({y_i} = c{x_i}\), answer the question of part (a). Again, verify your conjectures.

Mercury is a persistent and dispersive environmental contaminantfound in many ecosystems around the world.When released as an industrial by-product, it often finds itsway into aquatic systems where it can have deleteriouseffects on various avian and aquatic species. The accompanyingdata on blood mercury concentration (mg/g) for adult

females near contaminated rivers in Virginia was read from a graph in the article 鈥淢ercury Exposure Effects the Reproductive Success of a Free-Living Terrestrial Songbird, the Carolina Wren鈥 (The Auk, 2011: 759鈥769;this is a publication of the American Ornithologists鈥 Union).

.20 .22 .25 .30 .34 .41 .55 .56

1.42 1.70 1.83 2.20 2.25 3.07 3.25

a. Determine the values of the sample mean and sample median and explain why they are different. (Hint:\(\sum {{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = 18}}{\bf{.55}}} \))

b. Determine the value of the 10% trimmed mean and compare to the mean and median.

c. By how much could the observation .20 be increased without impacting the value of the sample median?

The value of Young鈥檚 modulus (GPa) was determined forcast plates consisting of certain intermetallic substrates,resulting in the following sample observations (鈥淪trengthand Modulus of a Molybdenum-Coated Ti-25Al-10Nb-3U-1Mo Intermetallic,鈥 J. of Materials Engr.and Performance, 1997: 46鈥50):

116.4 115.9 114.6 115.2 115.8

  1. Calculate\({\bf{\bar x}}\) and the deviations from the mean.
  2. Use the deviations calculated in part (a) to obtain the sample variance and the sample standard deviation.
  3. Calculate\({{\bf{s}}^{\bf{2}}}\)by using the computational formula for the numerator \({S_{xx}}\).
  4. Subtract 100 from each observation to obtain a sample of transformed values. Now calculate the sample variance of these transformed values, and compare it to\({{\bf{s}}^{\bf{2}}}\)for the original data.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.