/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q26E Let \({\rm{X}}\) be the total me... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Let \({\rm{X}}\) be the total medical expenses (in \({\rm{1000}}\) s of dollars) incurred by a particular individual during a given year. Although \({\rm{X}}\) is a discrete random variable, suppose its distribution is quite well approximated by a continuous distribution with pdf \({\rm{f(x) = k(1 + x/2}}{\rm{.5}}{{\rm{)}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}\) for.

a. What is the value of\({\rm{k}}\)?

b. Graph the pdf of \({\rm{X}}\).

c. What are the expected value and standard deviation of total medical expenses?

d. This individual is covered by an insurance plan that entails a \({\rm{\$ 500}}\) deductible provision (so the first \({\rm{\$ 500}}\) worth of expenses are paid by the individual). Then the plan will pay \({\rm{80\% }}\) of any additional expenses exceeding \({\rm{\$ 500}}\), and the maximum payment by the individual (including the deductible amount) is\({\rm{\$ 2500}}\). Let \({\rm{Y}}\) denote the amount of this individual's medical expenses paid by the insurance company. What is the expected value of\({\rm{Y}}\)?

(Hint: First figure out what value of \({\rm{X}}\) corresponds to the maximum out-of-pocket expense of \({\rm{\$ 2500}}\). Then write an expression for \({\rm{Y}}\) as a function of \({\rm{X}}\) (which involves several different pieces) and calculate the expected value of this function.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The value of k is \({\rm{2}}{\rm{.4}}\).

(b) Exponentially decreasing nature.

(c) \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.5,0}}{\rm{.6124}}\)

(d) \({\rm{160}}{\rm{.78}}\)

Step by step solution

01

Definition

Probability simply refers to the likelihood of something occurring. We may talk about the probabilities of particular outcomes鈥攈ow likely they are鈥攚hen we're unclear about the result of an event. Statistics is the study of occurrences guided by probability.

02

Determining the value of K

(a) pdf of \({\rm{X}}\) is given to us as:

As we know that every pdf \({\rm{f(x)}}\)must satisfy the following condition:

\(\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{f}} {\rm{(x) \times dx = 1}}\)

Hence for the given pdf, we can write:

\(\int_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{k}} {\left( {{\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}} \right)^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx = 1}}\)

Let us assume

\({\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}{\rm{ = t}}\)

, then

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{x = 2}}{\rm{.5(t - 1)}}\\{\rm{dx = (2}}{\rm{.5) \times dt}}\end{array}\)

03

The value of K

As \({\rm{x}}\) goes from \({\rm{0}}\) to \(\infty ,t\) goes from \({\rm{1}}\) to\(\infty \). Substituting these in the integration we get:

\(\begin{array}{l}\int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{k}} {\rm{ \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.5dt) = 1(2}}{\rm{.5)k}}\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}}\\{\rm{ = 1(2}}{\rm{.5)k}}\left( {{\rm{0 - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)\\{\rm{ = 1k}}\\{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{6}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}{\rm{k}}\\{\rm{ = 2}}{\rm{.4}}\end{array}\)

Conditions satisfied by a pdf: For a pdf to be a legitimate pdf, it must satisfy the following two conditions:

(i) for all \({\rm{x}}\)

(ii) \(\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{f}} {\rm{(x) \times dx = 1}}\)

04

Graph the pdf of X

(b)

Using the value of \({\rm{k}}\) calculated in part(a), the pdf of \({\rm{X}}\) can be finally written as:

It's graph of \({\rm{f(x)}}\) is given as below:

05

Determining the expected value

(c) The expected value of \({\rm{f(x)}}\) is written as:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{E(X) = }}\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{x}} {\rm{ \times f(x) \times dx}}\\{\rm{ = }}\int_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{x}} {\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.4)}}{\left( {{\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}} \right)^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx}}\end{array}\)

Let us assume

\({\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}{\rm{ = t}}\)

, then

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{x = 2}}{\rm{.5(t - 1)}}\\{\rm{dx = (2}}{\rm{.5) \times dt}}\end{array}\)

As \({\rm{x}}\) goes from \({\rm{0}}\) to \(\infty ,t\) goes from \({\rm{1}}\) to\(\infty \). Substituting these in eq(\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.1}}\)) we get :

\(\begin{aligned}&= \int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{2}} {\rm{.5(t - 1) \times (2}}{\rm{.4) \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.5dt)}}\\&= 15\int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{\rm{(t - 1)}}} {\rm{ \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx}}\\ &= 15\int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\left( {{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}} \right)} {\rm{ \times dx}}\\&= 15\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 5}}}}{\rm{ - }}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}}\\&= 15\left( {{\rm{(0) - }}\left( {\frac{{{\rm{ - 1}}}}{{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ - }}\frac{{{\rm{ - 1}}}}{{\rm{6}}}} \right)} \right)\\&= 15\left( {\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{6}}}} \right)\\&= 15 \times \frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{30}}}}\\{\rm{E(X) = 0}}{\rm{.5}}\end{aligned}\)

06

Determining the standard value

Definition: The expected or mean value of a continuous rv \({\rm{X}}\) with pdf \({\rm{f(x)}}\) is

\({\rm{\mu = E(X) = }}\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{x}} {\rm{ \times f(x) \times dx}}\)

Now we recall the following proposition:

Proposition: Variance \({\rm{V(X)}}\) and standard deviation \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{x}}}\) of a rv \({\rm{X}}\) with a given pdf can be written as:

\({\rm{V(X) = E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right){\rm{ - (E(X)}}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ }}{{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{x}}}{\rm{ = }}\sqrt {{\rm{V(X)}}} \)

First, we calculate \({\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right)\)

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right){\rm{ = }}\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}} {\rm{ \times f(x) \times dx}}\\{\rm{ = }}\int_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}} {\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.4)}}{\left( {{\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}} \right)^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx}}\end{array}\)

Let us assume

\({\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}{\rm{ = t}}\)

then

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{x = 2}}{\rm{.5(t - 1)}}\\{\rm{dx = (2}}{\rm{.5) \times dt}}\end{array}\)

07

Determining the standard deviation of medical expenses

As\({\rm{x}}\) goes from \({\rm{0 to }}\infty ,{\rm{t}}\) goes from \({\rm{1}}\) to\(\infty \). Substituting these in eq(\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.2}}\)) we get :

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{ = }}\int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{2}} {\rm{.}}{{\rm{5}}^{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{(t - 1)}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.4) \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.5dt)}}\\{\rm{ = 37}}{\rm{.5}}\int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\left( {{{\rm{t}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - 2t + 1}}} \right)} {\rm{ \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx}}\\{\rm{ = 37}}{\rm{.5}}\int_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\left( {{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}{\rm{ - 2}}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}{\rm{ + }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}} \right)} {\rm{ \times dx}}\\{\rm{ = 37}}{\rm{.5}}\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 4}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 4}}}}{\rm{ - 2}}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 5}}}}{\rm{ + }}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{\yen}}\\{\rm{ = 37}}{\rm{.5}}\left( {{\rm{(0) - }}\left( {{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{4}}}{\rm{ + }}\frac{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{6}}}} \right)} \right)\\{\rm{ = 37}}{\rm{.5}}\left( {\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{{\rm{24}}}}{\rm{ - }}\frac{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{5}}}} \right)\\{\rm{ = 37}}{\rm{.5 \times }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{60}}}}{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right)\\{\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.625}}\end{array}\)

Since we have already calculated\({\rm{E(X) = 0}}{\rm{.5}}\), hence \({\rm{V(X)}}\) is written as:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{V(X) = E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right){\rm{ - (E(X)}}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{2}}}\\{\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.625 - (0}}{\rm{.5}}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{2}}}\\{\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.625 - 0}}{\rm{.25}}\\{\rm{V(X) = 0}}{\rm{.375}}\end{array}\)

Then standard deviation can be calculated as:

Proposition: If \({\rm{X}}\) is a continuous rv with pdf \({\rm{f(x)}}\) and \({\rm{h(X)}}\) is any function of \({\rm{X}}\), then

\({\rm{E(h(X)) = }}\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{h}} {\rm{(x) \times f(x) \times dx}}\)

08

Determining the expected value of Y

(d)

Let \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}\) be total medical expanses when individual pays \({\rm{2500}}\) (including deductibles of \({\rm{500}}\) and \({\rm{20\% }}\) of the expanses exceeding\({\rm{500}}\)), Which means that at this point this \({\rm{20\% }}\) paid by the individual will be equal to\({\rm{2000}}\). Also keep in mind that the pdf \({\rm{f(x)}}\) is given for \({\rm{X}}\) which is in \({\rm{1000}}\)s of dollars.

\({\rm{0}}{\rm{.2}}\left( {{\rm{1000 \times }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - 500}}} \right){\rm{ = 2000}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = 10}}{\rm{.5}}\)

Finally, we can conclude that0:

\({\rm{y = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{X < 0}}{\rm{.5}}}\\{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.8(1000 \times X - 500)}}}&{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.5拢 X拢 10}}{\rm{.5}}}\\{{\rm{1000 \times X - 2500}}}&{{\rm{X > 10}}{\rm{.5}}}\end{array}} \right.\)

Now we can calculate expected value of y (let us denote it by\({{\rm{E}}_{\rm{y}}}\):

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{E}}_{\rm{y}}}{\rm{ = }}\int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{y}} {\rm{ \times f(x) \times dx}}\\{\rm{ = }}\int_{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.5}}}^{{\rm{10}}{\rm{.5}}} {\rm{0}} {\rm{.8(1000 \times x - 500) \times (2}}{\rm{.4)}}{\left( {{\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}} \right)^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx + }}\int_{{\rm{10}}{\rm{.5}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{\rm{(1000x - 2500)}}} {\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.4)}}{\left( {{\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}} \right)^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dx}}\end{array}\)

Let us assume

\({\rm{1 + }}\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{\rm{2}}{\rm{.5}}}}{\rm{ = t}}\)

then

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{x = 2}}{\rm{.5(t - 1)}}\\{\rm{dx = (2}}{\rm{.5) \times dt}}\end{array}\)

As \({\rm{x}}\) goes from \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.5}}\) to \({\rm{10}}{\rm{.5,t}}\) goes from \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.2}}\) to\({\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}\). And as \({\rm{x}}\) goes from \({\rm{10}}{\rm{.5}}\) to\(\infty \), \({\rm{t}}\) goes from \({\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}\) to\(\infty \). Substituting these in che integral we get:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{ = }}\int_{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.2}}}^{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}} {\rm{0}} {\rm{.8(2500 \times (t - 1) - 500) \times (2}}{\rm{.4)}}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.5dt) + }}\int_{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{\rm{(2500(}}} {\rm{t - 1) - 2500) \times (2}}{\rm{.4)}}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times (2}}{\rm{.5dt)}}\\{\rm{ = 4}}{\rm{.8}}\int_{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.2}}}^{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}} {{\rm{(2500t - 3000)}}} {\rm{ \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dt + 6}}\int_{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{\rm{(2500t - 5000)}}} {\rm{ \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}{\rm{ \times dt}}\\{\rm{ = 4}}{\rm{.8}}\int_{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.2}}}^{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}} {\left( {{\rm{2500 \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}{\rm{ - 3000 \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}} \right)} {\rm{ \times dt + 6}}\int_{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\left( {{\rm{2500 \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}{\rm{ - 5000 \times }}{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 7}}}}} \right)} {\rm{ \times dt}}\\{\rm{ = 4}}{\rm{.8}}\left( {{\rm{2500 \times }}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 5}}}}{\rm{ - 3000 \times }}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)_{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.2}}}^{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}}{\rm{ + 6}}\left( {{\rm{2500 \times }}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 5}}}}{\rm{ - 5000 \times }}\frac{{{{\rm{t}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}}}{{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)_{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.2}}}^{\rm{\yen}}\\{\rm{ = 4}}{\rm{.8}}\left( {{\rm{ - 500 \times }}\left( {{\rm{5}}{\rm{.}}{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}{\rm{ - 1}}{\rm{.}}{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}} \right){\rm{ + 500 \times }}\left( {{\rm{5}}{\rm{.}}{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}{\rm{ - 1}}{\rm{.}}{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)} \right){\rm{ + 6}}\left( {{\rm{ - 500 \times }}\left( {{\rm{0 - 5}}{\rm{.}}{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - 5}}}}} \right){\rm{ + (833}}{\rm{.33) \times }}\left( {{\rm{0 - 5}}{\rm{.}}{{\rm{2}}^{{\rm{ - 6}}}}} \right)} \right)\\{\rm{ = 160}}{\rm{.24 + 0}}{\rm{.54}}\\{{\rm{E}}_{\rm{y}}}{\rm{ = 160}}{\rm{.78}}\end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A deficiency of the trace element selenium in the diet can negatively impact growth, immunity, muscle and neuromuscular function, and fertility. The introduction of selenium supplements to dairy cows is justified when pastures have low selenium levels. Authors of the article 鈥淓ffects of Short Term Supplementation with Selenised Yeast on Milk Production and Composition of Lactating Cows鈥 (Australian J. of Dairy Tech., 2004: 199鈥203) supplied the following data on milk selenium concentration (mg/L) for a sample of cows given a selenium supplement and a control sample given no supplement, both initially and after a 9-day period.

Obs

InitSe

InitCont

FinalSe

FinalCont

1

11.4

9.1

138.3

9.3

2

9.6

8.7

104.0

8.8

3

10.1

9.7

96.4

8.8

4

8.5

10.8

89.0

10.1

5

10.3

10.9

88.0

9.6

6

10.6

10.6

103.8

8.6

7

11.8

10.1

147.3

10.4

8

9.8

12.3

97.1

12.4

9

10.9

8.8

172.6

9.3

10

10.3

10.4

146.3

9.5

11

10.2

10.9

99.0

8.4

12

11.4

10.4

122.3

8.7

13

9.2

11.6

103.0

12.5

14

10.6

10.9

117.8

9.1

15

10.8

121.5

16

8.2

93.0

a. Do the initial Se concentrations for the supplementand control samples appear to be similar? Use various techniques from this chapter to summarize thedata and answer the question posed.
b. Again use methods from this chapter to summarizethe data and then describe how the final Se concentration values in the treatment group differ fromthose in the control group.

Let \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{n}}}\) be independent \({\rm{rv's}}\) with mean values \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{n}}}\) and variances \({\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, \ldots ,\sigma }}_{{{\rm{\sigma }}^{\rm{*}}}}^{\rm{2}}\)Consider a function\({\rm{h}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{n}}}} \right)\), and use it to define a \({\rm{rv}}\)\({\rm{Y = h}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{n}}}} \right)\). Under rather general conditions on the \({\rm{h}}\)function, if the \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{i}}}\)'s are all small relative to the corresponding \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{i}}}\)'s, it can be shown that (\({\rm{E(Y)\gg h}}\left( {{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{n}}}} \right)\) and\({\rm{V(Y)\hat U }}{\left( {\frac{{{\rm{露h }}}}{{{\rm{露 }}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}}}} \right)^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ \times \sigma }}_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{ + L + }}{\left( {\frac{{{\rm{露h }}}}{{{\rm{露 }}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{n}}}}}} \right)^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ \times \sigma}}_{\rm{n}}^{\rm{2}}\))where each partial derivative is evaluated at \(\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{n}}}} \right){\rm{ = }}\)\(\left( {{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{n}}}} \right)\). Suppose three resistors with resistances \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{3}}}\)are connected in parallel across a battery with voltage\({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{4}}}\). Then by Ohm's law, the current is

\({\rm{Y = }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{4}}}\left( {\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}}}{\rm{ + }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}}}{\rm{ + }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{3}}}}}} \right)\)

Let \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = 10}}\)ohms, \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = 1}}{\rm{.0ohm,}}\quad {{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = 15}}\)ohms, \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = 1}}{\rm{.0ohm,}}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ = 20}}\)ohms, \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ = 1}}{\rm{.5ohms,}}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{4}}}{\rm{ = 120\;V}}\),

\({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{4}}}{\rm{ = 4}}{\rm{.0 \backslash mathrm\{ \;V}}\)}. Calculate the approximate expected value and standard deviation of the current (suggested by "6andom Samplings," CHEMTECH, \({\rm{1984: 696 - 697}}\)).

How does the speed of a runner vary over the course of a marathon (a distance of 42.195 km)? Consider determining both the time to run the first 5 km and the time to run between the 35-km and 40-km points, and then subtracting the former time from the latter time. A positive value of this difference corresponds to a runner slowing down toward the end of the race. The accompanying histogram is based on times of runners who participated in several different Japanese marathons (鈥淔actors Affecting Runners鈥 Marathon Performance,鈥 Chance, Fall, 1993: 24鈥30).What are some interesting features of this histogram? What is a typical difference value? Roughly what proportion of the runners ran the late distance more quickly than the early distance?

The article 鈥淓ffects of Short-Term Warming on Low and High Latitude Forest Ant Communities鈥 (Ecoshpere, May 2011, Article 62) described an experiment in which observations on various characteristics were made using mini chambers of three different types: (1) cooler (PVC

frames covered with shade cloth), (2) control (PVC frames only), and (3) warmer (PVC frames covered with plastic).One of the article鈥檚 authors kindly supplied the accompanying data on the difference between air and soil temperatures(掳C).

Cooler Control Warmer

1.59 1.92 2.57

1.43 2.00 2.60

1.88 2.19 1.93

1.26 1.12 1.58

1.91 1.78 2.30

1.86 1.84 0.84

1.90 2.45 2.65

1.57 2.03 0.12

1.79 1.52 2.74

1.72 0.53 2.53

2.41 1.90 2.13

2.34 2.86

0.83 2.31

1.34 1.91

1.76

a. Compare measures of center for the three different samples.

b. Calculate, interpret, and compare the standard deviations for the three different samples.

c. Do the fourth spreads for the three samples convey the same message as do the standard deviations about relative variability?

d. Construct a comparative boxplot (which was included in the cited article) and comment on any interesting features.

The accompanying data set consists of observations on shear strength (lb) of ultrasonic spot welds made on a certain type of alclad sheet. Construct a relative frequency histogram based on ten equal-width classes with boundaries 4000, 4200, 鈥. [The histogram will agree with the one in 鈥淐omparison of Properties of Joints Prepared by Ultrasonic Welding and Other Means鈥 (J. of Aircraft, 1983: 552鈥556).] Comment on its features.

5434

4948

4521

4570

4990

5702

5241

5112

5015

4659

4806

4637

5670

4381

4820

5043

4886

4599

5288

5299

4848

5378

5260

5055

5828

5218

4859

4780

5027

5008

4609

4772

5133

5095

4618

4848

5089

5518

5333

5164

5342

5069

4755

4925

5001

4803

4951

5679

5256

5207

5621

4918

5138

4786

4500

5461

5049

4974

4592

4173

5296

4965

5170

4740

5173

4568

5653

5078

4900

4968

5248

5245

4723

5275

5419

5205

4452

5227

5555

5388

5498

4681

5076

4774

4931

4493

5309

5582

4308

4823

4417

5364

5640

5069

5188

5764

5273

5042

5189

4986

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.