/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q19E The number of contaminating part... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The number of contaminating particles on a silicon waferprior to a certain rinsing process was determined for eachwafer in a sample of size 100, resulting in the followingfrequencies:

Number of particles 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Frequency1 2 3 12 11 15 18 10

Number of particles8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Frequency12 4 5 3 1 2 1

a. What proportion of the sampled wafers had at leastone particle? At least five particles?

b. What proportion of the sampled wafers had betweenfive and ten particles, inclusive? Strictly between fiveand ten particles?

c. Draw a histogram using relative frequency on thevertical axis. How would you describe the shape of thehistogram?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.The proportion of the sampled wafers that had at least one particle is 0.99.

The proportion of the sampled wafers that had at least five particlesis 0.71.

b.The proportion of the sampled wafers that had between five and ten particles, inclusive is 0.64.

The proportion of the sampled wafers that had between five and ten particles, strictlyis 0.44.

c.

The shape of the histogram is right-skewed.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Thefrequencies of the number of contaminating particles on a silicon wafer prior to a certain rinsing processare provided.

The size of the sample is 100.

02

Calculate the proportion

Let X represents the number of particles.

The relative frequency is computed as,

\({\rm{relative frequency }} = \frac{{frequency}}{{Total\;number\;of\;observations}}\)

The table representing the relative frequency is computed as,

Number of particles

Frequency

Relative Frequency

0

1

0.01

1

2

0.02

2

3

0.03

3

12

0.12

4

11

0.11

5

15

0.15

6

18

0.18

7

10

0.1

8

12

0.12

9

4

0.04

10

5

0.05

11

3

0.03

12

1

0.01

13

2

0.02

14

1

0.01

a.

Theproportion of the sampled wafers that had at least one particle is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}P\left( {X \ge 1} \right) &= 1 - P\left( {X < 1} \right)\\ &= 1 - P\left( {X = 0} \right)\\ &= 1 - 0.01\\ &= 0.99\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the proportion of the sampled wafers that had at least one particle is0.99.

The proportion of the sampled wafers that had at least five particlesis computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}P\left( {X \ge 5} \right) &= 1 - P\left( {X < 5} \right)\\ &= 1 - \left( {P\left( {X = 0} \right) + P\left( {X = 1} \right) + ... + P\left( {X = 4} \right)} \right)\\ &= 1 - \left( {0.01 + 0.02 + ... + 0.11} \right)\\ &= 1 - 0.29\\ &= 0.71\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the proportion of the sampled wafers that had at least five particlesis 0.71.

03

Given information

Thefrequencies of the number of contaminating particles on a silicon wafer prior to a certain rinsing process are provided.

The size of the sample is 100.

04

Calculate the proportion

Let X represents the number of particles.

Referring to the relative frequencies of part a,

b.

Theproportion of the sampled wafers that had between five and ten particles, inclusive is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}P\left( {5 \le X \le 10} \right) &= P\left( {X = 5} \right) + P\left( {X = 6} \right) + P\left( {X = 7} \right) + ... + P\left( {X = 10} \right)\\ &= 0.15 + 0.18 + 0.1 + ... + 0.05\\ &= 0.64\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the proportion of the sampled wafers that had between five and ten particles, inclusive is 0.64.

Theproportion of the sampled wafers that had between five and ten particles, inclusive is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}P\left( {5 < X < 10} \right) &= P\left( {X = 6} \right) + P\left( {X = 7} \right) + ... + P\left( {X = 9} \right)\\ &= 0.18 + 0.1 + ... + 0.01\\ &= 0.44\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the proportion of the sampled wafers that had between five and ten particles, strictlyis 0.44.

05

Given information

Thefrequencies of the number of contaminating particles on a silicon wafer prior to a certain rinsing process are provided.

The size of the sample is 100.

06

Construct a histogram and comment on the shape

Referring to the relative frequencies computed in part a,

Steps to construct a histogram are,

1) Determine the frequency or the relative frequency.

2) Mark the class boundaries on the horizontal axis.

3) Draw a rectangle on the horizontal axis corresponding to the frequency or relative frequency.

The histogram is represented as,

From the above-represented Histogram, it can be observed that it is close to moderate positive skewed.

Therefore, the shape is close to positive skewed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \({\rm{X}}\) denote the amount of space occupied by an article placed in a \({\rm{1 - f}}{{\rm{t}}^{\rm{3}}}\) packing container. The pdf of \({\rm{X}}\) is

\({\rm{f(x) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{90}}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{8}}}{\rm{(1 - x)}}}&{{\rm{0 < x < 1}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{ otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

a. Graph the pdf. Then obtain the cdf of \({\rm{X}}\) and graph it. b. What is \({\rm{P(X}} \le {\rm{.5)}}\) (i.e., \({\rm{F(}}{\rm{.5)}}\))? c. Using the cdf from (a), what is \({\rm{P(}}{\rm{.25 < X}} \le {\rm{.5)}}\)? What is \({\rm{P(}}{\rm{.25}} \le {\rm{X}} \le {\rm{.5)}}\)? d. What is the \({\rm{75th}}\) percentile of the distribution? e. Compute \({\rm{E(X)}}\) and \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{X}}}\). f. What is the probability that \({\rm{X}}\) is more than \({\rm{1}}\) standard deviation from its mean value?

a. If a constant cis added to each \({x_i}\)in a sample, yielding \({y_i} = {x_i} + c\), how do the sample mean and median of the \({y_i}'s\)relate to the mean and median of the\({x_i}'s\)? Verify your conjectures.

b. If each \({x_i}\)is multiplied by a constant c,yielding \({y_i} = c{x_i}\), answer the question of part (a). Again, verify your conjectures.

A sample of 77 individuals working at a particular office wasselected and the noise level (dBA) experienced by each individual was determined, yielding the followingdata (鈥淎cceptable Noise Levels for Construction Site Offices,鈥 Building Serv. Engr. Research and Technology, 2009: 87鈥94).

55.3

55.3

55.3

55.9

55.9

55.9

55.9

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.1

56.8

56.8

57.0

57.0

57.0

57.8

57.8

57.8

57.9

57.9

57.9

58.8

58.8

58.8

59.8

59.8

59.8

62.2

62.2

63.8

63.8

63.8

63.9

63.9

63.9

64.7

64.7

64.7

65.1

65.1

65.1

65.3

65.3

65.3

65.3

67.4

67.4

67.4

67.4

68.7

68.7

68.7

68.7

69.0

70.4

70.4

71.2

71.2

71.2

73.0

73.0

73.1

73.1

74.6

74.6

74.6

74.6

79.3

79.3

79.3

79.3

83.0

83.0

83.0

Use various techniques discussed in this chapter to organize, summarize, and describe the data.

In a famous experiment carried out in 1882, Michelson,and Newcomb obtained 66 observations on the time it took for light to travel between two locations in Washington, D.C. A few of the measurements(coded in a certain manner) were 31, 23, 32, 36, 22, 26, 27, and 31.

a. Why are these measurements not identical?

b. Is this an enumerative study? Why or why not?

Many universities and colleges have instituted supplemental

instruction (SI) programs, in which a student facilitator meets regularly with a small group of students enrolled in the course to promote discussion of course material and enhance subject mastery. Suppose that students in a large statistics course (what else?) are randomly divided into a control group that will not participate in SI and a treatment group that will participate. At the end of the term, each student鈥檚 total score in the course is determined.

a. Are the scores from the SI group a sample from an existing population? If so, what is it? If not, what is the relevant conceptual population?

b. What do you think is the advantage of randomly dividing the students into the two groups rather than letting each student choose which group to join?

c. Why didn鈥檛 the investigators put all students in the treatment group? [Note:The article 鈥淪upplemental Instruction: An Effective Component of Student Affairs Programming鈥 (J. of College Student Devel., 1997: 577鈥586) discusses the analysis of data from several SI programs.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.