/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q52SE 聽Four plots were available for ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Four plots were available for an experiment to compare clover accumulation for four different sowing rates (鈥淧erformance of Overdrilled Red Clover with Different Sowing Rates and Initial Grazing Managements,鈥 N. Zeal. J. of Exp. Ag., 1984: 71鈥81). Since the four plots had been grazed differently prior to the experiment and it was thought that this might affect clover accumulation, a randomized block experiment was used with all four sowing rates tried on a section of each plot. Use the given data to test the null hypothesis of no difference in true mean clover accumulation (kg DM/ha) for the different sowing rates.

Short Answer

Expert verified

It appears that the accumulation does not depend on the sowing rate.

Step by step solution

01

Find the hypotheses of interest.

Let

Where the following holds

And where the are independent normally distributed random variable with mean 0 and variance \({\sigma ^2}\). The hypotheses interest are

\({H_{0A}}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = \ldots = {\alpha _I} = 0\)versus \({H_{aA}}:{\rm{\;at least one\;}}{\alpha _ - }i \ne 0\)

And, for the factor B

\({H_{0B}}:{\beta _1} = {\beta _2} = \ldots = {\beta _J} = 0\) versus \({H_{aB}}:{\rm{\;at least one\;}}{\beta _ - }j \ne 0\)

02

Compute test static value.

The following table summarizes values which will be required to compute the test statistic value.

03

Find average of measurements.

Values of I and J are

I=4-number of rows;

J=4 - number of columns.

Before continuing, denote with \({\bar X_i}\) the average of measurements obtained when factor A is held at level i

With \({\bar X_{ \cdot j}}\)the average of measurements obtained when factor B is held at level j

And with \({\bar X_{..}}\), the grand mean

Observed values are denoted with small x instead of big \(X\). The notation without line over\(X\)are just the sums.

04

Find sum of squares \({\rm{\;Compute them one by one}}{\rm{. Starting with sum of measurements for factor A at corresponding level\;}}\) \({x_{1.}} = 1155 + 2255 +  \ldots   + 4632 = 11547\)

\({x_{2.}} = 123 + 406 + \ldots + 416 = 1509\)

\({x_{3.}} = 68 + 416 + \ldots + 379 = 1525\)

\({x_4} = 62 + 75 + \ldots + 564 = 1063\).

The sum of measurements for factor B at corresponding level

\({x_{.1}} = 1155 + 123 + 68 + 62 = 1408\)

\({x_{.2}} = 2255 + 406 + 416 + + 75 = 3152\)

\({x_{.3}} = 3505 + 564 + 662 + 362 = 5093\)

\({x_{.4}} = 4632 + 416 + 379 + 564 = 5991\)

The grand sum is

The sum of squares are given by

With degrees of freedom respectively

\(d{f_T} = IJ - 1\)

\(d{f_A} = I - 1\)

\(d{f_B} = J - 1\)

\(d{f_E} = (I - 1)(J - 1)\)

05

Compute SST,SSA,SSB

SST can be computed as

\( = \left( {{{1155}^2} + {{2255}^2} + \ldots + {{362}^2} + {{564}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4 \cdot 4}} \cdot 15,{644^2}\)

\( = 42,048,790 - 15,295,921\)

\( = 26,752,869\)

SSA can be computed as

\( = \frac{1}{4} \cdot \left( {11,{{547}^2} + {{1509}^2} + + {{1525}^2} + {{1063}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4 \cdot 4}} \cdot 15,{644^2}\)

\( = 34,766,471 - 15,295,921\)

\( = 19,470,550\)

SSB can be computed as

\( = \frac{1}{4} \cdot \left( {{{1408}^2} + {{1509}^2} + + {{3152}^2} + {{5093}^2} + {{5991}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4 \cdot 4}} \cdot 15,{644^2}\)

\( = 18,437,074.5 - 15,295,921\)

\( = 3,141,153.5\)

Fundamental Idendity:

\(SST = SSA + SSB + SSE\)

By the fundamental identity, the SSE can be computed as

\(SSE = SST - SSA - SSB = 26,752,869 - 19,470,550 - 3,141,153.5\)

=4,141,165.5

06

Find value of test statics.

When testing hypotheses \({H_{0A}}\) versus \({H_{aB}}\),the test static value is

\({f_A} = \frac{{MSA}}{{MSE}}\)

And the P-value is the area under the \({F_{I - 1,(I - 1)(J - 1)}}\)curve to the right to the test static value\({f_A}\)

When testing hypotheses\({H_{0B}}\)versus \({H_{aB}}\)the tst sstatic value is

\({f_B} = \frac{{MSB}}{{MSE}}\),

And the P-value is the area under the \({F_{J - 1,(I - 1)(J - 1)}}\)curve to the right of the test static value\({f_B}\).

The degrees of freeom are

\(d{f_T} = IJ - 1 = 4 \cdot 4 - 1 = 15\)

\(d{f_A} = I - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3\)

\(d{f_B} = J - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3\)

\(d{f_E} = (I - 1)(J - 1) = (4 - 1) \cdot (4 - 1) = 9\)

The mean squares are

\(MSA = \frac{1}{{I - 1}} \cdot SSA = \frac{1}{3} \cdot 19,470,550 = 6,490,183.33\)

\(MSB = \frac{1}{{J - 1}} \cdot SSB = \frac{1}{3} \cdot 3,141,153.5 = 1,047,051.17\)

\(MSE = \frac{1}{{(I - 1)(J - 1)}} \cdot SSE = \frac{1}{9} \cdot 4,141,165.5 = 460,129.50\)

The value of test statics are

\({f_A} = \frac{{MSA}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{6,490,183.33}}{{460,129.50}} = 14.11\)

\({f_B} = \frac{{MSB}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{1,047,051.17}}{{460,129.50}} = 2.280\)

07

Use software to conclude.

\({\rm{\;There are two ways to make conclusion}}{\rm{. Using the table in the appendix or compute\;}}P{\rm{\;value using a software}}{\rm{.\;}}\)

The \({P_A}\)value when testing the hypotheses\({H_{0A}}\) versus\({H_{aA}}\)is \({P_A} = P\left( {F > {f_A}} \right) = P(F > 14.11) = 0.00\)

Which was computed using the software, and random variables \(F\) has Fisher鈥檚 distribution with degree of freedom,\(I - 1 = 3\)and \((I - 1)(J - 1) = 9\),because \({P_A} = 0.00 < 0.05 = \alpha \)

Reject hypotheses \({H_{0A}}\) at given significance level.

The \({P_B}\)value when testing hypothesis\({H_{0B}}\)versus \({H_{aB}}\)is \({P_B} = P\left( {F > {f_B}} \right) = P(F > 2.28) = 0.15\)

which was computed using software, and random variable \(F\)has Fisher鈥檚 distribution with degree of value \(J - 1 = 3\)and \((I - 1)(J - 1) = 9\)because,

\({P_B} = 0.15 > 0.05 = \alpha \)

Do not reject hypotheses \({H_{0B}}\)

At given significance level.

08

Use table in the appendix to compare.

Using the fact that \({F_{\alpha ,I - 1,(I - 1)(J - 1)}} = {F_{0.05,3,9}} = 3.86\)

which was obtained from the table in the appendix, and from the fact that

\({F_{0.05,3,9}} = 3.86 < 14.11 = {f_A}\)

Do not reject hypotheses \({H_{0A}}\)at given significance level.

And also using the fact that \({F_{\alpha ,J - 1,(I - 1)(J - 1)}} = {F_{0.05,3,9}} = 3.86\)

which was obtained from the table in the appendix, and the fact that

\({F_{0.05,3,9}} = 3.86 > 2.28 = {f_B}\)

Do not reject hypotheses \({H_{0B}}\)

At the significance level.

09

Step9:Find Sowing rate.

Finally, the result can be represented in a table

It appears that the accumulation does not depend on the sowing rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Four different coatings are being considered for corrosion protection of metal pipe. The pipe will be buried in three different types of soil. To investigate whether the amount of corrosion depends either on the coating or on the type of soil, 12 pieces of pipe are selected. Each piece is coated with one of the four coatings and buried in one of the three types of soil for a fixed time, after which the amount of corrosion (depth of maximum pits, in .0001 in.) is determined. The data appears in the table.

a. Assuming the validity of the additive model, carry out the ANOVA analysis using an ANOVA table to see whether the amount of corrosion depends on either the type of coating used or the type of soil. Use=.05.

b. Compute\(\hat \mu ,{\hat \alpha _1},{\hat \alpha _2},{\hat \alpha _3},{\hat \alpha _4},{\hat \beta _1},{\hat \beta _2},\;and\;{\hat \beta _3}\)

An investigation of the machinability of beryllium-copper alloy using two different dielectric mediums and four different working currents resulted in the following data on material removal rate (this is a subset of the data that appeared in the article 鈥淪tatistical Analysis and Optimization Study on the Machinability of Beryllium Copper Alloy in Electro Discharge Machining,鈥 J. of Engr. Manufacture, 2012: 1847鈥1861).

a. After constructing an ANOVA table, test at level .05 both the hypothesis of no medium effect against the appropriate alternative and the hypothesis of no working current effect against the appropriate alternative.

b. Use Tukey鈥檚 procedure to investigate differences in expected material removal rate due to different working currents (Q.05,4,3 = 6.825).

In an experiment in investigale the effect of "cement factor" (number of sacks of cement per cub艒c yard) on flex= ural strength of the resulting concrele ('Studies of Flecural Strength of Concrete. Part 3: Effects of Variation in Testing Procedure, Proceedings, ASTM, 1957: 1127-1139 ), I=3 different factor values were used, I=5 different batches of cement were selected, and K=2 beams were cast from cach cement factod batch combination. Sums of squares include SSA=22,941.80, SSB=22,765.53, SSE=15,253.50, and SST - 64,954.7D. Construct the ANOVA table. Then, assuming a mixed model with cement factor (A) fixed and batches (B) random, test the three pairs of hypotheses of interest at level .05.

The water absorption of two types of mortar used to repair damaged cement was discussed in the article 鈥淧olymer Mortar Composite Matrices for Maintenance-Free, Highly Durable Ferrocement鈥 (J. of Ferrocement, 1984: 337鈥345). Specimens of ordinary cement mortar (OCM) and polymer cement mortar (PCM) were submerged for varying lengths of time (5, 9, 24, or 48 hours) and water absorption (% by weight) was recorded. With mortar type as factor A (with two levels) and submersion period as factor B (with four levels), three observations were made for each factor level combination. Data included in the article was used to compute the sums of squares, which were SSA 5 322.667, SSB 535.623, SSAB 5 8.557, and SST 5 372.113. Use this information to construct an ANOVA table. Test the appropriate hypotheses at a .05 significance level.

Coal-fired power plants used in the electrical industry have gained increased public attention because of the environmental problems associated with solid wastes generated by large-scale combustion (鈥淔ly Ash Binders in Stabilization of FGD Wastes,鈥 J. of Environmental Engineering, 1998: 43鈥49). A study was conducted to analyze the influence of three factors鈥攂inder type (A), amount of water (B), and land disposal scenario (C)鈥 that affect certain leaching characteristics of solid wastes from combustion. Each factor was studied at two levels. An 23 experiment was run, and a response value EC50 (the effective concentration, in mg/L, that decreases 50% of the light in a luminescence bioassay) was measured for each combination of factor levels. The experimental data is given in the following table:

Carry out an appropriate ANOVA, and state your conclusions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.